The study once again shows that we'd be so much better off if we just let people get infected and encourage the use of proven early treatment protocols.
So for immunocompromised people, just screw us? We can't get infected, we have no immune system to fight for us.
I will take Omicron over the jab right now. Lets get it on.
Steve, I heard you say that you had the vacvine earlier. I’m just curious; you’re a highly intelligent man. What was your rationale for doing so? Did you just accept the experts’ advice at that time?
Why I ask is because a man who I regularly meet, while walking our dog, told me he got the jab. Yet, he was so proud that at his age (75), he never had a vaccine or a drug in his life. He got quite agitated when I told him the vaccines don’t actually work and walked off.
Has our new writer in residence Dr. Topol chimed in yet?
Have any of you come across any papers or studies on whether or not this vaccine can shed?
You missed the most important detail of that study: You get SIGNIFICANTLY different outcomes if you had the vaccine first, the caught COVID, vs catching COVID, then getting the vax. This SCREAMS "original antigenic sin."
Steve, have you looked into terrain theory? This Beauchamp book..linked below...is very in line with your thinking. Basically, it goes into the history of vaccinations and shows in numerous instances, that the vaccines may have reduced the risk of acquiring one pathogen, but led to other problems and, specifically, an INCREASE IN ALL-CAUSE MORTALITY. This is a historical thing with numerous vaccines. A bit about this in RFK's book as well.
Hence, I don't think this is something unique only to SARS-COV-2. It's a historical problem with mass vaccination and honestly Pasteur may be wrong that vaccination is the way to control the spread of viruses in many cases.
The better way may simply be to strengthen the immune system, or terrain, and treat early, since there will always be viruses and they are essentially unavoidable. This philosophy I think is superior, meaning the foundation of Western Medicine is fundamentally corrupt and largely based on erroneous principles.
I feel like “try to get infected” isn’t exactly the advice Steve…
Grabbed this condensed version of the Israeli study cut down in easy to consume factoids. Would make for a handy brochure or insert for holiday cards.... https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=244442
But if the vaccine wasn't used, Big Pharma couldn't make billions and Trump, the acknowledged "father of the vaccine", couldn't feed his ego and play superhero who defeated the pandemic.
If one looks at the supplemental materials of this study (https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.04.21267114v1.supplementary-material), interesting details come up. By "vaccinated then recovered" they mean vaccinated 1st time then infected before the 2nd jab. And most recoveries happen right after the 1st jab, thanks to the jab causing the infection by flooring their immunity. All this analysis is also good for nothing as the study period coincides with the sharp peak of infections in Jan. 2021 while in the midst of the primary vaccination campaign. And the boosters happened in the absence of the disease in Israel, other than that induced by boosting itself, starting Jul. 31, 2021. So, tons of artifacts in this study, and no way to correctly account for it. And as they vaxxed their recovered and there was no Covid wave in June-Oct. (other than booster-induced), the recovered-then-vaxxed look PRETTY GOOD just because of this coincidence. So, consume with a pound of salt the different comparisons.
It's lookin' like Israel really went full-retard on this, just like Poop Francis - who'd of thunk it?!
Add this to the growing list of possible vaccine "benefits". This paper is one observational case study so there is much more work to be done before we can declare that the so-called "vaccine" causes cancer, but angioimmunoblastic t-cell lymphoma makes covid-19 look like a Sunday picnic.
You missed possibly the most important point. The last rows in the chart. Vaccinated then recovered somehow wanes faster than recovered or recovered then vaccinated. Seems the vaccine could mess with the immune response leaving you worse off than if you just recovered. Highlighting these should only be used on the most vulnerable populations.
What you will never hear/read on the controlled MSM - Get plenty of rest, plenty of love, vitamin D, eat some broccoli, get some sunshine, exercise and drink fluids.
It occurs to me that a good way to assess vaccine performance is to run stats on people with medical exemptions. If the mainstream narrative is correct, these people can’t have better outcomes than the vaccinated. However, I predict that people with exemptions (when adjusted for age and comorbidities) actually have lower overall rates of infection and death from Covid than either the vaccinated or the general unvaccinated. This is because people with exemptions are simply more conscious of their overall health and behave accordingly.
If people with exemptions have lower death rates from Covid than the vaccinated, then all bets are off, and the fraud is naked for everyone to see.