Matthew Crawford is not a statistician. Jeff Morris is. I guess who is right between the two 😀
Which makes Jeff Morris' unprofessional arguments all the more embarrassing. A bio-statistician who:
1) Tries to discredit VAERS which is used by the CDC to do bio-statistical analysis on safety [strike one]
2) Tries to compare different dose counts as a way to justify defective shots - even though single dose data for SC2 is also available [strike two]
3) Refuses a debate on the topic [strike three]
4) Refuses to answer any of the supplied questions on the statistics [strike four]
5) Attacks URF methodology also used by the CDC, but doesn't offer his own [strike five]
If he is a bio-statistician, he's the least informed one I've ever seen and I'd opt never to hire the man.
You still believe in Iraqi WMD's, don't you? Bless your heart.....
undefined subscriptions will be displayed on your profile (edit)
Skip for now
For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.
Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.
Matthew Crawford is not a statistician. Jeff Morris is. I guess who is right between the two 😀
Which makes Jeff Morris' unprofessional arguments all the more embarrassing. A bio-statistician who:
1) Tries to discredit VAERS which is used by the CDC to do bio-statistical analysis on safety [strike one]
2) Tries to compare different dose counts as a way to justify defective shots - even though single dose data for SC2 is also available [strike two]
3) Refuses a debate on the topic [strike three]
4) Refuses to answer any of the supplied questions on the statistics [strike four]
5) Attacks URF methodology also used by the CDC, but doesn't offer his own [strike five]
If he is a bio-statistician, he's the least informed one I've ever seen and I'd opt never to hire the man.
You still believe in Iraqi WMD's, don't you? Bless your heart.....