Many of the top people at NEJM who made outrageous statements in the NEJM are apparently trying to bury their mistakes- The traditional and the AI search engines are both making it hard to find their ivermectin misformation statements, etc. Must be filters on the AI and the NLM. Scary
When a medical journal recommends that sex be removed from birth certificates because we won't know until the kid grows up and tells us, it is no longer a scientific publication; it is a tabloid. The once-prestigious NEJM has done exactly that. Its credibility is shot. The brilliant men who founded it and built its reputation are dead. The current bunch have destroyed it.
Medical journals are far from "scientific," when they refuse to acknowledge all results. The field of Medical research journals can't be trusted; and many in the field of medicine are showing their true colors.; soon people will trust nothing they promote. The best thing coming out of this...people are learning the truth about this so called "vaccine" industry. Fauci helped create a problem, so he could make a bundle solving it.
The scientific journals are like a Seattle Times headline, a joke. BUT help is on the way. Bill Gates is working on a ivermectin vaccine. Thank God we have someone looking out for us!
. .As if this wasn’t bad enough, the Lancet produced a One Health Commission and a Food (EAT) Commission to assist in ushering in the New World Order. After publishing many articles on ‘One Health’ produced by its One Health Commission (basically a waste of paper, as the Commissioners had great difficulty finding any evidence that the “One Health Approach” was good for anything) the Lancet editors came out with this doozy, which I reproduce in full because you wouldn’t believe me if I just wrote about it. My comments follow this Lancet editorial, published in January 2023.
"The One Health high-level expert panel defines one health as "an integrated unifying approach that aims to sustainably balance and optimize the health of people, animals, and ecosystems."
[Hmmm, what exactly are we balancing?}
Although the series focuses on pandemic preparedness, One Health goes way beyond emerging infections and novel pathogens; it is the foundation for understanding and addressing the most existential threats to societies including antimicrobial resistance, food and nutrition insecurity, and climate change."
While in Boston last week for RFK Jr’s launch I got into a heated discussion with my brother in law a Harvard educated, Columbia trained retired dermatologist who loves “THE Science” - that is the flawless incomparable NEJM which has the final say on anything and everything medically related. For him it’s the Bible and all else is heresy.
So when I mentioned IVM and HCQ he chuckled and said those drugs don’t work for Covid - AND IT’S A PROVEN FACT. When I told him about Dr Zelenko, he just shrugged him off as another greedy quack who should have been ignored for practicing bad medicine. When I told him that Zelenko treated a large number of high risk Covid patients with HCQ and they all survived, he said it doesn’t matter. It’s not science. All I could say was that to them it definitely did matter.
Modern Medicine is literally making the world a sicker place.
I think it would be great for Vaccine Safety Research Foundation to publish both a peer-reviewed journal and a regular magazine but more funding is needed.
Big Pharma has billions of dollars but an ounce of truth dispels a pound of lies.
Evidence that threatens the profits of Medical-Industrial, we dare not publish, else we will be spanked by our donors. And we don't like getting spanked. So its so much easier for us to reject such threatening papers out of hand. Thats "Science" in the modern age.
So, if the criteria for publication is now purely biased speculation not evidence, how is anyone supposed to draw any conclusion that will benefit medicine or people who need care?
Cmon Steve. How can big Pharma make any money off of a medicine (ivermectin) that won a Nobel prize in science? And it's cheap! How can big Pharma make any money off of a medicine ( chlorine dioxide) that has been used for decades around this planet and it is VERY cheap? It is and always will be about the money. End of story
One idea is to do away with the traditional medical journals (like NEJM and Lancet) altogether. Anybody (or any company) with some research or trial data to report can post the raw data (without interpretation and without peer review) on their own website and/or on a publicly funded website.
There needs to be some minimal funding to support/manage such a public website so that people can easily track and search the papers, including revisions, if any. But, unlike NEJM etc., this website will not reject a paper based on the implications of its content.
After the raw data is posted, anybody who has the skills to interpret the data can do so for the benfit of others and post their summary and intepretation on the same website. There can be multiple interpretations of the same data. Readers can decide (with their votes and comments) which papers, and which interpretataions, are most meaningful and most useful.
How far the gatekeepers have fallen.
Many of the top people at NEJM who made outrageous statements in the NEJM are apparently trying to bury their mistakes- The traditional and the AI search engines are both making it hard to find their ivermectin misformation statements, etc. Must be filters on the AI and the NLM. Scary
When a medical journal recommends that sex be removed from birth certificates because we won't know until the kid grows up and tells us, it is no longer a scientific publication; it is a tabloid. The once-prestigious NEJM has done exactly that. Its credibility is shot. The brilliant men who founded it and built its reputation are dead. The current bunch have destroyed it.
Medical journals are far from "scientific," when they refuse to acknowledge all results. The field of Medical research journals can't be trusted; and many in the field of medicine are showing their true colors.; soon people will trust nothing they promote. The best thing coming out of this...people are learning the truth about this so called "vaccine" industry. Fauci helped create a problem, so he could make a bundle solving it.
The scientific journals are like a Seattle Times headline, a joke. BUT help is on the way. Bill Gates is working on a ivermectin vaccine. Thank God we have someone looking out for us!
Take a look at the latest Lancet paper that reduces people to livestock status:
https://merylnass.substack.com/p/must-read-the-trojan-horse-of-one
. .As if this wasn’t bad enough, the Lancet produced a One Health Commission and a Food (EAT) Commission to assist in ushering in the New World Order. After publishing many articles on ‘One Health’ produced by its One Health Commission (basically a waste of paper, as the Commissioners had great difficulty finding any evidence that the “One Health Approach” was good for anything) the Lancet editors came out with this doozy, which I reproduce in full because you wouldn’t believe me if I just wrote about it. My comments follow this Lancet editorial, published in January 2023.
"The One Health high-level expert panel defines one health as "an integrated unifying approach that aims to sustainably balance and optimize the health of people, animals, and ecosystems."
[Hmmm, what exactly are we balancing?}
Although the series focuses on pandemic preparedness, One Health goes way beyond emerging infections and novel pathogens; it is the foundation for understanding and addressing the most existential threats to societies including antimicrobial resistance, food and nutrition insecurity, and climate change."
While in Boston last week for RFK Jr’s launch I got into a heated discussion with my brother in law a Harvard educated, Columbia trained retired dermatologist who loves “THE Science” - that is the flawless incomparable NEJM which has the final say on anything and everything medically related. For him it’s the Bible and all else is heresy.
So when I mentioned IVM and HCQ he chuckled and said those drugs don’t work for Covid - AND IT’S A PROVEN FACT. When I told him about Dr Zelenko, he just shrugged him off as another greedy quack who should have been ignored for practicing bad medicine. When I told him that Zelenko treated a large number of high risk Covid patients with HCQ and they all survived, he said it doesn’t matter. It’s not science. All I could say was that to them it definitely did matter.
Modern Medicine is literally making the world a sicker place.
Two slagazines currently owned by Marvel comics, owned by Disney...
I think it would be great for Vaccine Safety Research Foundation to publish both a peer-reviewed journal and a regular magazine but more funding is needed.
Big Pharma has billions of dollars but an ounce of truth dispels a pound of lies.
Evidence that threatens the profits of Medical-Industrial, we dare not publish, else we will be spanked by our donors. And we don't like getting spanked. So its so much easier for us to reject such threatening papers out of hand. Thats "Science" in the modern age.
So, if the criteria for publication is now purely biased speculation not evidence, how is anyone supposed to draw any conclusion that will benefit medicine or people who need care?
Maybe it shouldn't say "even if Pierre Kory is a co-author", but rather "ESPECIALLY IF Pierre Kory is a co-author."
Cmon Steve. How can big Pharma make any money off of a medicine (ivermectin) that won a Nobel prize in science? And it's cheap! How can big Pharma make any money off of a medicine ( chlorine dioxide) that has been used for decades around this planet and it is VERY cheap? It is and always will be about the money. End of story
One idea is to do away with the traditional medical journals (like NEJM and Lancet) altogether. Anybody (or any company) with some research or trial data to report can post the raw data (without interpretation and without peer review) on their own website and/or on a publicly funded website.
There needs to be some minimal funding to support/manage such a public website so that people can easily track and search the papers, including revisions, if any. But, unlike NEJM etc., this website will not reject a paper based on the implications of its content.
After the raw data is posted, anybody who has the skills to interpret the data can do so for the benfit of others and post their summary and intepretation on the same website. There can be multiple interpretations of the same data. Readers can decide (with their votes and comments) which papers, and which interpretataions, are most meaningful and most useful.
CALL TO ALL CANADIANS - A prominent Conservative MP Dr. Leslyn Lewis is sponsoring Petition e-4401 to the Government of Canada which must be signed before May 20, 2023, at 3:33 p.m. (EDT) https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/canadian-petition?utm_source=substack&utm_
Dr. Lewis has a Facebook Page on which the talks about the lack of Parliamentary debate on the WHO Pandemic Treaty - https://www.facebook.com/LeslynLewisCPC/
CALL TO ALL AMERICANS - Contact Your Congressman to "Exit The WHO" - All info. and contact numbers are on the James Roguski Substack site - https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/exit-the-who?utm_source=substack&utm