Well, the fact checkers went over the analysis of BKK and found a lot of reasons to discredit the analysis, and therefore found the firing of the CEO justified: https://www.tagesschau.de/investigativ/swr/bkk-provita-studie-querdenken-101.html

Expand full comment

Did you know that biden paid MSM a billion dollars to push vaccine agenda(it's got to be our money that he paid with) Did you know that PFIZER KNEW of 1291 severe reactions to vaccine and did not alert anyone about them, they knew and knowingly let the vaccine out! THAT IS CALLED FRAUD!!! Since the drug(vax ) is EUA and thus Pfizer had NO LIABILITY, BUT and this is big, if there is known FRAUD on Big Pharma's part YOU CAN SUE THEM even with EUA!!! BIG Pharma and FDA all knew about the severe reactions and INSTEAD of pulling vax off the market, they chose to let it out and make billions, they hoped that the truth wouldn't come out for 75 years. But FREEDOM of INFORMATION ACT GOT THE TRUTH ROLLING!!!! SUE THOSE BASTARDS for everything, sue anyone who forced or mandated you, hospital, nurses, doctors, big Pharma, fda, cdc, nih, who sue everyone!!! Then sue biden personally and the MSM for going along with LIES!!!

Expand full comment

Amazing condensed explanation of covid by Dr. Vladimir Zelenko in this video starting at about 8:30 minutes on the timer. Really worth the time. https://cvdsecrets.com/sneek-peak/?mpweb=1603-842-470789

Expand full comment
Mar 5, 2022·edited Mar 5, 2022

Science deniers succeed in de-ad-ing (de-monetizing) a climatologist's posts because they didn't like that the data he was collecting could not be used to support the dominant narrative.


Expand full comment

I’m a pessimist, but am starting to feel like the tide might be turning and certain authorities are looking for cover.

Watch this video of Australian Health Official.


Expand full comment

Funny how nowhere have I seen people talk about that. Doctors losing their jobs for having a difference of opinion? Really?

Expand full comment
Mar 4, 2022·edited Mar 4, 2022

As usual, not sure where to post this, which Steve K. article's comment section. But, merely quoting from the RFK Jr. site which quotes from a Kansas newspaper:

"The Kansas health agency stopped airing television advertisements promoting the COVID-19 vaccine after some Republican lawmakers took issue with calling the shots safe and effective.

The revelation came during Janet Stanek’s confirmation hearing Wednesday before the Senate Public Health and Welfare Committee. Stanek is the acting secretary of the Kansas Department of Health and Environment.

Sen. Mark Steffen, R-Hutchinson, again raised the issue Wednesday. “When it comes to the COVID shot … we talked about the problem that KDHE was basically saying ‘safe and effective, safe and effective, safe and effective’ when we have a CDC VAERS reporting system that ties 20,000-plus deaths, and more complications, to these shots than all the other vaccines combined,” he said.

“One thing we’ve done is revisited the ads, which were brought up by many of you, and we have removed the TV ads,” Stanek said.

Steve, gracias. I do see echoes of the Steve K. meme (a true one) that the Covid19 "vaccines" have racked up more reported adverse events than all previous vaccines combined: I see that meme made it to the Kansas state legislature.

P.S. if this got posted twice, I think Substack did that. I only hit Save or Post once.

Expand full comment

Interesting article if you follow the money, as financial news, on MarketWatch yesterday:


In brief: "Twitter is expanding Birdwatch, its crowd-sourced fact-checking project it started as a small and -->little-publicized<-- pilot program more than a year ago. The program lets regular people flag and notate misleading tweets... This is separate from Twitter’s news verification partnerships with The Associated Press and Reuters."

Expand full comment
Mar 4, 2022·edited Mar 4, 2022

Steve! Have you seen this yet?

Wasn't sure where to post this.......!!!!


This is a DHS Bulletin issued Feb 7th, 2022!

I never in my life thought I would ever hear/see this in my lifetime!

If you value your Freedom, you had better watch this:

< 3 minutes.

D.H.S. Now Labels Free Speech as Domestic Terrorism in America!


Expand full comment

Privacy of personal information is VITAL in a free society. And privacy of medical records is part of that!

The privacy of one's medical records is a protection against being singled out for discrimination based on health! Why would anyone want even one of their health records open to public scrutiny? Indeed, when those who are vaccinated turn out to be the ones who can be classified as sicker (due to having injured immune systems, greater risk of cancer, greater risk of heart disease or stroke, and so on), they may find employers or insurers, or credit and loan sources will use such information against them considering them too great a risk. Can the vaccinated not see that their vaccine status can quickly morph from a beautiful Compliance Trophy into something that marks them for exclusion? It will be an invasive remover of protective privacy.

Many of the articles on Vaccine I.D. claim that medical records will not be on the passports. In response I say: Vaccine status IS A MEDICAL RECORD, probably one of the most blatant! You might not care if someone knows you gave birth with Caesarean section or that you had tennis elbow ten years ago! But if you are now unlucky enough to be a vaccine injury statistic, that Vaccine Passport could mean your vaccine health status being an open book is going to be a problem.

Check out what they're up to now:


Expand full comment

This is censorship

Expand full comment

But now we need to empower them; 18 year old MIT students are just as naive as any other 18 year old. They have good potential but aren't capable wielding own powers, yet. They cannot speak in their defense of themselves as adults could.

Expand full comment
Mar 4, 2022·edited Mar 4, 2022

United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights are moving and profound, until one reaches near the end where they tell you -- What the U.N. gives, the U.N. can take away.

Article 29, N0. 3

These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.

Expand full comment
Mar 4, 2022·edited Mar 4, 2022

GLOBAL Pandemic Policy Brewing

If you think the Global Elite are backing away on mandates, think again.

The World Health Organization (WHO or more appropriately Bill Gates' Vaccine-pushing WHO Toy) is not admitting that covid vaccines don't stop infection and transmission, or that covid vaccines are not worth the literal COST$, not worth the coercion and fear, and not worth rolling out PROOF-OF-VACCINATION-PASSPORTS. Instead, VACCINE PASSPORTS are still on the table. And they want us to "buy-in" on such schemes. (Plan seems to be a step one totalitarian creeping compliance requirement for PROOF-OF-VACCINATION-PASSPORT beginning with a VAX-THAT-DOESN'T-WORK-PASSPORT for all international travel.)

Here's a quote from one WHO release:

"...to maintain continued community buy-in for public health and social measures after two years of the pandemic and the risk of overly optimistic statements regarding the state of the pandemic...." https://www.who.int/news/item/19-01-2022-statement-on-the-tenth-meeting-of-the-international-health-regulations-(2005)-emergency-committee-regarding-the-coronavirus-disease-(covid-19)-pandemic

WHO has power to instruct member states. Note the existence of Public Hearings; are they really public? Can anyone attend? Can the public comment?



Article 19 of the WHO Constitution provides the World Health Assembly with the authority to adopt conventions or agreements on any matter within WHO’s competence. The sole instrument established under Article 19 to date is the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, which has made a significant and rapid contribution to protecting people from tobacco since its entry into force in 2005.

Under the decision adopted today, the INB will hold its first meeting by 1 March 2022 (to agree on ways of working and timelines) and its second by 1 August 2022 (to discuss progress on a working draft). It will also hold public hearings to inform its deliberations; deliver a progress report to the 76th World Health Assembly in 2023; and submit its outcome for consideration by the 77th World Health Assembly in 2024.

Through the decision, the World Health Assembly also requested the WHO Director-General to convene the INB meetings and support its work, including by facilitating the participation of other United Nations system bodies, non-state actors, and other relevant stakeholders in the process to the extent decided by the INB. [Unquote]

Looks like a swift move that could bring a tighter, stricter program before Bill Gates' and Vaccine Czar Tony Fauci's next pandemic?

NOTE: It took decades to stop the Corporate predators from capitalizing on deadly and addicting cigarettes. Is this retribution for all those lost tobacco profits? I guess this is payback time for pushing for honest truth on tobacco products. Now they'll use those same control and safety methods for tobacco, refashioned for "viruses" against us to try to force us to be vaccinated and prove it over and over wherever we want to go, whatever we want to do.

Expand full comment

This is really like in a dystopian totalitarianism, vax totalitarianism, although the vaccines dont work preventing infection or transmission of COVID, most of the Western governments want to force their citizens to take it, and although the evidence is mounting, how dangerous the vaccine is, everyone trying to warn about the risks is being censored and destroyed. What is going on here? Is it only about profits, or is there something more sinister behind this?

Expand full comment