The data we need is hidden behind public health firewalls, ONLY accessible to qualified researchers who are SPONSORED by their academic institution. I need your help to free the data.
Steve, what you need is someone in Australia with access to our AIR (Australian Immunisation Register). It used to be called the ACIR (Australian Childhood Immunisation Register). Since its establishment in 1998, it tracked all children up to the age of 7 and with the introduction of No Jab No Pay, it started tracking all Australians of any age. We have socialised medicine in Australia and every single person who is on our Medicare database (all Australians from birth - it is our version of the Social Security card only it encompasses our health system as well) has their Medicare number linked to the AIR. That will tell exactly what illnesses a person has been diagnosed or treated with. Every time they go to the doctor or hospital; every time they buy a drug if they use a prescription - this information is linked with their unique Medicare number. It also tracks what vaccines each person has been given.
In 2003, I went to Canberra representing the Australian Vaccination Network. We asked for a study to be done using the data on the ACIR (at that time) comparing the overall health of the vaccinated vs the unvaccinated. We were told that this would not be done.
12 years ago, I had a televised debate with Dr Peter McIntyre, then the head of the NCIRS. I asked about this study and he claimed that it was already being done. That was untrue. A freedom of information request showed that there was no such study and there never had been.
If you can find someone with access to this database, they can do something that has never been done anywhere in the world - cheaply, easily and quickly: They can analyse the data on tens of millions of infants, children and adults to see which group - the vaccinated or the unvaccinated are healthier and less likely to need drug-based treatments. Also, which illnesses each group is being diagnosed with. Cancer, Autism, Allergies, Asthma, Eczema, Diabetes - the list goes on. Each one of these conditions has a numerical code that can be queried in the database and linked with the vaccination status of the person.
If you can find a way to access this, it would be a world-changer!
It's possible but what you are asking for is going to target that scientist, because the data will be traceable. It's a similar problem to the marked NZ data that was designed to out anybody that touched it.
What you should do is get a legal request in place for that data. It's public data and there is very little that the institutions can do to deny it although they may be able to impose restrictions on its distribution.
We know thecsvuentist will be fired. Would you get fired to save potentially millions more people and help millions of suffering people? He or she will be financially ok because we will go fund them like no tomorrow! You cannot get the data without a whistle-blower! It's not considered public data. Many attempts were made.
Anyone has their price - how about a "1 million dollar offer" for this, might be a good offer for a frustrated poor sod eyeing an exit anyway. Enough to sail around the world and/or come up with a more fruitful career
INFANTICIDE WAR CRIMES: Pediatricians Push 5.5 Million Children To Get Injected With The Latest Version Of The Covid "Vaccine"
We know that the COVID infection fatality rate (IFR) for children is zero, and yet the criminal American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) is still recommending that all babies receive a Modified mRNA slow kill bioweapon “vaccine” at 6 months old, and then an annual dose going forward until the child or eventual adult succumbs to VAIDS.
This piece really made me think about the ethical data governance challenges inherant in open sourcing mortality rates; how can we ensure that raw, aggregated data is truly understood and not misused without proper epidemiological context?
Well, better late than never. It's a fantastic idea. Maybe offer to pay for a consultation with a lawyer as well, to assure them it's legal. I mean, if you think such a concern might be giving people pause. Maybe Aaron Siri or someone like him would do that pro bono.
I do find these data access issues perplexing, though. Does RFK not have authority to access it? I mean, I've even heard of him being denied access to HHS data. I don't get it. Perhaps you are thinking of state government data. In that case, do we have so few friends in high places, that you need to offer such incentives? Wouldn't Joe Ladapo give you all the data you want from Florida? Or, why hasn't Joe done the KCOR analysis himself...?
You probably didn't think of this before, because you may be putting yourself at risk.
The nature of this cv19 operation was that it may have had some involvement as a military operation, with some secrecy aspects for the people working on it.
I hope you have had this request you're making thoroughly legally analyzed.
"Public" data probably means that, ultimately, it was funded by the taxpayers, but it's treated as proprietary data, not available to those whose money funded it.
Good idea Steve Kirsch - let's hope those with access to the data do the right thing to help youto objectively prove that "millions of human lives" are not being saved by vaccines, but are being injured or lost.
I see your frustration Steve but this isn't the way to go about obtaining data. Here's why: If you obtain data this way, no one serious will believe the results. Research that relies on nontransparent access, selective aggregation, or unverifiable ways of getting the data is dead on arrival.
Science relies on reproducibility. If independent researchers cannot obtain the same data through transparent public channels and replicate the analysis the conclusions won't matter.
If the goal is persuasion rather than confirmation bias, the data must be publicly accessible, the inclusion criteria explicit, and the analysis reproducible. Anything else will be dismissed immediately, and rightly so.
Many independent researchers Can access the data. Maybe a study from Steve will induce them to actually do the same analysis - to see for themselves.
But to your larger point, Steve has already done a lot of good analysis, and the level of persuasion from it strikes me as low. I think it's good to add to it with another dataset, but big picture - we need an entirely different strategy for persuasion that complements Steve's work. I don't know what that is. Humans baffle me, lol.
Steve, what you need is someone in Australia with access to our AIR (Australian Immunisation Register). It used to be called the ACIR (Australian Childhood Immunisation Register). Since its establishment in 1998, it tracked all children up to the age of 7 and with the introduction of No Jab No Pay, it started tracking all Australians of any age. We have socialised medicine in Australia and every single person who is on our Medicare database (all Australians from birth - it is our version of the Social Security card only it encompasses our health system as well) has their Medicare number linked to the AIR. That will tell exactly what illnesses a person has been diagnosed or treated with. Every time they go to the doctor or hospital; every time they buy a drug if they use a prescription - this information is linked with their unique Medicare number. It also tracks what vaccines each person has been given.
In 2003, I went to Canberra representing the Australian Vaccination Network. We asked for a study to be done using the data on the ACIR (at that time) comparing the overall health of the vaccinated vs the unvaccinated. We were told that this would not be done.
12 years ago, I had a televised debate with Dr Peter McIntyre, then the head of the NCIRS. I asked about this study and he claimed that it was already being done. That was untrue. A freedom of information request showed that there was no such study and there never had been.
If you can find someone with access to this database, they can do something that has never been done anywhere in the world - cheaply, easily and quickly: They can analyse the data on tens of millions of infants, children and adults to see which group - the vaccinated or the unvaccinated are healthier and less likely to need drug-based treatments. Also, which illnesses each group is being diagnosed with. Cancer, Autism, Allergies, Asthma, Eczema, Diabetes - the list goes on. Each one of these conditions has a numerical code that can be queried in the database and linked with the vaccination status of the person.
If you can find a way to access this, it would be a world-changer!
can anyone help here?
It's possible but what you are asking for is going to target that scientist, because the data will be traceable. It's a similar problem to the marked NZ data that was designed to out anybody that touched it.
What you should do is get a legal request in place for that data. It's public data and there is very little that the institutions can do to deny it although they may be able to impose restrictions on its distribution.
We know thecsvuentist will be fired. Would you get fired to save potentially millions more people and help millions of suffering people? He or she will be financially ok because we will go fund them like no tomorrow! You cannot get the data without a whistle-blower! It's not considered public data. Many attempts were made.
Anyone has their price - how about a "1 million dollar offer" for this, might be a good offer for a frustrated poor sod eyeing an exit anyway. Enough to sail around the world and/or come up with a more fruitful career
Absolutely. I wouldn't ask Steve to pay the price alone though. There should be something akin to GoFundMe.
This conflict will not occur without casualties. If we are not willing to pay very high personal prices we might as well stop right now.
I meant to link to the Peter McIntyre debate - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ck1-XCz_cxY
We have tried to get the vital statistics from our county. They have stopped posting the death rate since 2020. I wonder why?
INFANTICIDE WAR CRIMES: Pediatricians Push 5.5 Million Children To Get Injected With The Latest Version Of The Covid "Vaccine"
We know that the COVID infection fatality rate (IFR) for children is zero, and yet the criminal American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) is still recommending that all babies receive a Modified mRNA slow kill bioweapon “vaccine” at 6 months old, and then an annual dose going forward until the child or eventual adult succumbs to VAIDS.
https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/infanticide-war-crimes-pediatricians
Join ➣ 👉@COVID19VACCINEVICTIMSANDFAMILIES
I sure hope you have plenty of people willing to help. This would be excellent to get to the masses.
This piece really made me think about the ethical data governance challenges inherant in open sourcing mortality rates; how can we ensure that raw, aggregated data is truly understood and not misused without proper epidemiological context?
Well, better late than never. It's a fantastic idea. Maybe offer to pay for a consultation with a lawyer as well, to assure them it's legal. I mean, if you think such a concern might be giving people pause. Maybe Aaron Siri or someone like him would do that pro bono.
I do find these data access issues perplexing, though. Does RFK not have authority to access it? I mean, I've even heard of him being denied access to HHS data. I don't get it. Perhaps you are thinking of state government data. In that case, do we have so few friends in high places, that you need to offer such incentives? Wouldn't Joe Ladapo give you all the data you want from Florida? Or, why hasn't Joe done the KCOR analysis himself...?
Have you ever heard of Wolfram Alfa
https://www.wolframalpha.com/
It might speed things up for you.
>I regret I didn’t think of this before.<
You probably didn't think of this before, because you may be putting yourself at risk.
The nature of this cv19 operation was that it may have had some involvement as a military operation, with some secrecy aspects for the people working on it.
I hope you have had this request you're making thoroughly legally analyzed.
We need people who are willing to get fired to see millions of lives! I will give as much as I can to a "go fund me" for any individual who does this!
I wud gladly help EXPOSE Any TRUTH, if I was able.
I will be Enrolling in the Spring
to Medical Coding Course.
Im not sure which school I will enroll to yet. Im still researching many online schools.
If U have any Suggestions to which has best credibility,
Please let Me know.
Ms Honey J.
"Public" data probably means that, ultimately, it was funded by the taxpayers, but it's treated as proprietary data, not available to those whose money funded it.
Data does not lie, rhetoric does.
I didn't realize all this data was available - and so incredibly gatekeeper-ed.
I like your approach.
Good idea Steve Kirsch - let's hope those with access to the data do the right thing to help youto objectively prove that "millions of human lives" are not being saved by vaccines, but are being injured or lost.
Merry Christmas Steve. God Bless you richly and every one answering your call
I see your frustration Steve but this isn't the way to go about obtaining data. Here's why: If you obtain data this way, no one serious will believe the results. Research that relies on nontransparent access, selective aggregation, or unverifiable ways of getting the data is dead on arrival.
Science relies on reproducibility. If independent researchers cannot obtain the same data through transparent public channels and replicate the analysis the conclusions won't matter.
If the goal is persuasion rather than confirmation bias, the data must be publicly accessible, the inclusion criteria explicit, and the analysis reproducible. Anything else will be dismissed immediately, and rightly so.
Many independent researchers Can access the data. Maybe a study from Steve will induce them to actually do the same analysis - to see for themselves.
But to your larger point, Steve has already done a lot of good analysis, and the level of persuasion from it strikes me as low. I think it's good to add to it with another dataset, but big picture - we need an entirely different strategy for persuasion that complements Steve's work. I don't know what that is. Humans baffle me, lol.