The data we need is hidden behind public health firewalls, ONLY accessible to qualified researchers who are SPONSORED by their academic institution. I need your help to free the data.
Steve, what you need is someone in Australia with access to our AIR (Australian Immunisation Register). It used to be called the ACIR (Australian Childhood Immunisation Register). Since its establishment in 1998, it tracked all children up to the age of 7 and with the introduction of No Jab No Pay, it started tracking all Australians of any age. We have socialised medicine in Australia and every single person who is on our Medicare database (all Australians from birth - it is our version of the Social Security card only it encompasses our health system as well) has their Medicare number linked to the AIR. That will tell exactly what illnesses a person has been diagnosed or treated with. Every time they go to the doctor or hospital; every time they buy a drug if they use a prescription - this information is linked with their unique Medicare number. It also tracks what vaccines each person has been given.
In 2003, I went to Canberra representing the Australian Vaccination Network. We asked for a study to be done using the data on the ACIR (at that time) comparing the overall health of the vaccinated vs the unvaccinated. We were told that this would not be done.
12 years ago, I had a televised debate with Dr Peter McIntyre, then the head of the NCIRS. I asked about this study and he claimed that it was already being done. That was untrue. A freedom of information request showed that there was no such study and there never had been.
If you can find someone with access to this database, they can do something that has never been done anywhere in the world - cheaply, easily and quickly: They can analyse the data on tens of millions of infants, children and adults to see which group - the vaccinated or the unvaccinated are healthier and less likely to need drug-based treatments. Also, which illnesses each group is being diagnosed with. Cancer, Autism, Allergies, Asthma, Eczema, Diabetes - the list goes on. Each one of these conditions has a numerical code that can be queried in the database and linked with the vaccination status of the person.
If you can find a way to access this, it would be a world-changer!
I see your frustration Steve but this isn't the way to go about obtaining data. Here's why: If you obtain data this way, no one serious will believe the results. Research that relies on nontransparent access, selective aggregation, or unverifiable ways of getting the data is dead on arrival.
Science relies on reproducibility. If independent researchers cannot obtain the same data through transparent public channels and replicate the analysis the conclusions won't matter.
If the goal is persuasion rather than confirmation bias, the data must be publicly accessible, the inclusion criteria explicit, and the analysis reproducible. Anything else will be dismissed immediately, and rightly so.
At first glance I read it as "AFFLICTED," which I think speaks to the disposition of the entire country with respect to what "higher education" has collapsed into.
Please. Will all you academicians who can help with this project please do so? Many of you know what is at stake. In fact, I think most of you probably know. It is time to end the coverup.
Fantastic idea Steve! And we can all spread the word, never know who has a brother in law that would fit the bill. The people of NZ seem to be motivated for honesty.
Regarding Steve's post recently on whether or not the shots developed specifically to harm people, and GROK said no, I'm respectfully asking Steve to have Dr Michael Yeadon on, former Pfizer scientist. Dr Yeadon had quite the evolution of thinking since 2021. Here he is 10 days ago:
Dr Francis Boyle, the author of the American Bioweapons Act, states in a deposition that the covid shots are bioweapons and explains why. Unfortunately, Steve cannot interview Dr Boyle because he died unexpectedly in 2025. Since Dr Boyle is unavailable, Dr Michael Yeadon would be a great person for an interview on this topic. Most guilty verdicts in courtrooms are not issued due to Smoking Gun evidence but rather due to the preponderance of evidence that leaves no reasonable doubt about innocence.
Dr. Yeadon is more convincing. He uses straightforward logic, leading to a simple conclusion: There is no possible way the shots were not specifically designed to depopulate. I doubt there was a memo.
It's an Aristotelian notion described as first causes, popular among theologians and seminarians, but you probably heard it, like most things of an ontological nature, in grammar school, the great existential question resolving primacy of the chicken or the egg. Salesmen, especially in life insurance, know that you sell to the pain point and the feeling of necessity. We are adopting this mafioso-style "protection racket" in the courts, where the Constitution says all controversies are decided. IBV, a recombinant coronavirus, derived from the first coronavirus ever discovered back in 1932 had been the leading cause of pneumonia deaths worldwide. Despite there being over 3,000 coronaviruses that infect mammals and over 3,000 that infect birds, this causative agent of avian bronchitis had been aberrant from nature, presenting a lethal pathogenesis like IBV, SARS, MERS and COVID-19, all recombinant or chimeric viruses that can only come from a lab. Created crisis yields profits in elixirs and remedies. The smallest viable sample recovered for measles after an outbreak, according to CDC was 5 microns, almost as large as the smallest deployment configuration unit of tear gas that cannot naturally exhibit aerosol characteristics and requires an aerosol generating procedure. I can more readily stop the terrorists from attacking my children than vaccinate my children in the event of attack.
Yet, according to the Section 564 public health emergency, and the corresponding EUA, repeated practically verbatim by Pfizer, Moderna and Janssen in their submissions for approval and award of billions of dollars in government contracts, we had not a highly contagious disease, which a virus you had less than a five percent chance of catching, 12 times too low to be so described as a highly contagious disease, a sine qua non prerequisite for a superspreader, this was the modus operandi for the pandemic and response, at only the cost of beating Hitler to sell products developed without the prerequisite knowledge of infectious dose and correlates of protection, presenting a clear and present danger of severe autoimmune response including sudden death by lethal anaphylactic shock. It was all in accessible law and science reports nobody cared or wanted to read. 🤪
Steve, what you need is someone in Australia with access to our AIR (Australian Immunisation Register). It used to be called the ACIR (Australian Childhood Immunisation Register). Since its establishment in 1998, it tracked all children up to the age of 7 and with the introduction of No Jab No Pay, it started tracking all Australians of any age. We have socialised medicine in Australia and every single person who is on our Medicare database (all Australians from birth - it is our version of the Social Security card only it encompasses our health system as well) has their Medicare number linked to the AIR. That will tell exactly what illnesses a person has been diagnosed or treated with. Every time they go to the doctor or hospital; every time they buy a drug if they use a prescription - this information is linked with their unique Medicare number. It also tracks what vaccines each person has been given.
In 2003, I went to Canberra representing the Australian Vaccination Network. We asked for a study to be done using the data on the ACIR (at that time) comparing the overall health of the vaccinated vs the unvaccinated. We were told that this would not be done.
12 years ago, I had a televised debate with Dr Peter McIntyre, then the head of the NCIRS. I asked about this study and he claimed that it was already being done. That was untrue. A freedom of information request showed that there was no such study and there never had been.
If you can find someone with access to this database, they can do something that has never been done anywhere in the world - cheaply, easily and quickly: They can analyse the data on tens of millions of infants, children and adults to see which group - the vaccinated or the unvaccinated are healthier and less likely to need drug-based treatments. Also, which illnesses each group is being diagnosed with. Cancer, Autism, Allergies, Asthma, Eczema, Diabetes - the list goes on. Each one of these conditions has a numerical code that can be queried in the database and linked with the vaccination status of the person.
If you can find a way to access this, it would be a world-changer!
can anyone help here?
I meant to link to the Peter McIntyre debate - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ck1-XCz_cxY
I see your frustration Steve but this isn't the way to go about obtaining data. Here's why: If you obtain data this way, no one serious will believe the results. Research that relies on nontransparent access, selective aggregation, or unverifiable ways of getting the data is dead on arrival.
Science relies on reproducibility. If independent researchers cannot obtain the same data through transparent public channels and replicate the analysis the conclusions won't matter.
If the goal is persuasion rather than confirmation bias, the data must be publicly accessible, the inclusion criteria explicit, and the analysis reproducible. Anything else will be dismissed immediately, and rightly so.
At first glance I read it as "AFFLICTED," which I think speaks to the disposition of the entire country with respect to what "higher education" has collapsed into.
Please. Will all you academicians who can help with this project please do so? Many of you know what is at stake. In fact, I think most of you probably know. It is time to end the coverup.
You are a brave and noble person to care this much
Good luck, Steve! I hope you are flooded with offers and, then, with data!
Why won't RFK Jr. and his crew assist you in this endeavor?
Fantastic idea Steve! And we can all spread the word, never know who has a brother in law that would fit the bill. The people of NZ seem to be motivated for honesty.
Christmas greetings to you! Thinking of your steadfast dedication to the truth and to our lives, and profoundly thankful for you on this special day.
Regarding Steve's post recently on whether or not the shots developed specifically to harm people, and GROK said no, I'm respectfully asking Steve to have Dr Michael Yeadon on, former Pfizer scientist. Dr Yeadon had quite the evolution of thinking since 2021. Here he is 10 days ago:
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2025/12/no_author/former-pfizer-vice-president-covid-shots-were-designed-to-cause-injury-reduce-fertility/
Dr Francis Boyle, the author of the American Bioweapons Act, states in a deposition that the covid shots are bioweapons and explains why. Unfortunately, Steve cannot interview Dr Boyle because he died unexpectedly in 2025. Since Dr Boyle is unavailable, Dr Michael Yeadon would be a great person for an interview on this topic. Most guilty verdicts in courtrooms are not issued due to Smoking Gun evidence but rather due to the preponderance of evidence that leaves no reasonable doubt about innocence.
no need. just show me the memo from the head of US DoD detailing the plan to kill people in the US and the rest of the world.
That would be convincing.
Dr. Yeadon is more convincing. He uses straightforward logic, leading to a simple conclusion: There is no possible way the shots were not specifically designed to depopulate. I doubt there was a memo.
It's an Aristotelian notion described as first causes, popular among theologians and seminarians, but you probably heard it, like most things of an ontological nature, in grammar school, the great existential question resolving primacy of the chicken or the egg. Salesmen, especially in life insurance, know that you sell to the pain point and the feeling of necessity. We are adopting this mafioso-style "protection racket" in the courts, where the Constitution says all controversies are decided. IBV, a recombinant coronavirus, derived from the first coronavirus ever discovered back in 1932 had been the leading cause of pneumonia deaths worldwide. Despite there being over 3,000 coronaviruses that infect mammals and over 3,000 that infect birds, this causative agent of avian bronchitis had been aberrant from nature, presenting a lethal pathogenesis like IBV, SARS, MERS and COVID-19, all recombinant or chimeric viruses that can only come from a lab. Created crisis yields profits in elixirs and remedies. The smallest viable sample recovered for measles after an outbreak, according to CDC was 5 microns, almost as large as the smallest deployment configuration unit of tear gas that cannot naturally exhibit aerosol characteristics and requires an aerosol generating procedure. I can more readily stop the terrorists from attacking my children than vaccinate my children in the event of attack.
Yet, according to the Section 564 public health emergency, and the corresponding EUA, repeated practically verbatim by Pfizer, Moderna and Janssen in their submissions for approval and award of billions of dollars in government contracts, we had not a highly contagious disease, which a virus you had less than a five percent chance of catching, 12 times too low to be so described as a highly contagious disease, a sine qua non prerequisite for a superspreader, this was the modus operandi for the pandemic and response, at only the cost of beating Hitler to sell products developed without the prerequisite knowledge of infectious dose and correlates of protection, presenting a clear and present danger of severe autoimmune response including sudden death by lethal anaphylactic shock. It was all in accessible law and science reports nobody cared or wanted to read. 🤪
Great idea Steve. We appreciate your ongoing persistence to bring pressure to bear on the corrupted ones.
Go Steve 👍. I hope this will surface some big whale whistleblowers spraying a fountain of real data 🐳.
You don't have to be a whistleblower. Everything I'm asking for is simply standard practice.