Its really amazing how the only country to release actual data is the Czech Republic. It says a lot about just how corrupt the whole global system is.
The non-release of Covid data reminds me of how the CDC has delayed the release of cancer death data. Utter incompetence - or - "something" is causing a cancer pandemic and the CDC doesn't want us to know. Tuskeegee is now happening to everyone, because nobody was punished the last time it happened.
This text refers to SEER, and it's outdated: "2022 is the latest year for which cancer incidence data are available; 2023 is the latest year for which cancer death data are available."
Last month SEER released incidence data for 2023 and mortality data for 2024. SEER similarly released cancer incidence data up to 2017 in April 2020, data up to 2018 in April 2021, and so on: https://seer.cancer.gov/data/data-changes.html. So the incidence data has routinely been released with a delay of 3 years.
Recently Nicolas Hulscher and Charlotte Kupperwasser posted plots of cancer incidence data from SEER, where they cherrypicked combinations of age group and cancer type that had gone up since 2021.
In a plot Hulscher made for the incidence of 5 cancer types in ages 0-49, 3 out of 5 cancer types he picked were colorectal cancers, which went up since 2021 because the screening age for CRC was lowered from 50 to 45, so the screening rate in ages 45-49 increased by about 4-fold between 2019 and the last quarter of 2022: https://x.com/henjin256/status/2052571215659708436. But there is no clear increase in the incidence of CRC in ages 15-39: https://x.com/henjin256/status/2047701140951667105.
2) The only countries with wide use of Soberana were Cuba and Iran, everyone else used either mrna or vector based vaccines (exceptions for some Indian vaccines, novavax, etc). Some doses of Soberana were given in Venezuela and other countries.
3) Cuba has a national system for collecting organ and tissue donations post mortem, all donations are processed via the same teams in the same facilities, there was no unusual staff turnover between 2019 and 2022.
4) Organ and tissue collection technicians notice the same things embalmers notice (the fibrous clots in blood vessels), this isn't news in the USA in large part because those people are minimum wage employees with few rights and high turnover, so many of the collection techs working in 2022 were not working in 2019. My anecdotal information is that the tissue techs in the USA are finding 'shrimp' and 'calamari' in their post-2021 blood samples.
5) If the fibrous clots are caused by the vector vaccines, Cuban collection technicians should be unfamiliar with them. Those vaccines were not used in Cuba.
6) Cuba has published nothing on newly observed fibrous clots starting in 2020/2021, therefore, Cuban techs have likely not seen them; there is no reason they would choose to be silent about them if they had in fact observed them.
I don't believe that anyone has asked the Cubans about this. The relevant officials' identities are not secret, and the Cuban government may permit them to answer questions, if asked by someone without hostile politics.
If the Cuban medical community has seen fibrous clots post mortem, they are probably not caused by the vector vaccines. If they have not seen them, either the fibrous clots do not exist, or they are in fact only appearing in places that used the vector vaccines.
I'm not going to call Cuba, but maybe someone else with more stature could.
So the only tangible stats that can be drawn from the use of DANGEROUS if not DEADLY) mRNA injections, is that those who believed the vax hype are now more susceptible to all diseases and illnesses that they were before the jab was administered.
The only other long term conclusion will prove that those who accepted the lies about mRNA injections being SAFE and EFFECTIVE, will prove to have reduced their previous Life Expectancy. Only time will tell how much their Life Expectancy will have been reduced by studying long term evidence.
Reading Sasha's post about LNPs being the common denominator between the jabs and some new mixture being tested, I wonder how much current research is being biased by the test subjects having been vaxxed. How can we trust any results with such a polluted population?
The only tangible stats that can be drawn from the use of DANGEROUS, if not DEADLY, mRNA injections, is that those who believed Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZenica, etc, vax hype (lies) are now more susceptible to all diseases and illnesses that they were before the jab was administered. Their natural immunity from such illnesses has been destroyed by Big Parma.
The only other long term conclusion will prove that those who accepted the lies about mRNA injections being SAFE and EFFECTIVE, will prove to have reduced their previous Life Expectancy. Only time will tell how much their Life Expectancy will have been reduced by studying long term evidence.
Steve, this link is a short clip you may find of specific interest. It pertains to allergies from shot ingredients, was taken from a recent, much longer Shannon Joy interview w Sasha:
Not so surprising at all that public health officials, media and government refuses to engage with the data. Assuming your agenda is depopulation, poisoning, and control of the population, data is an annoying distraction from your agenda. Better to sweep it under the rug and keep it out of public awareness. Even better, call all good data "conspiracy theories". Vaccines, Amen!
Thanks for being one of the few media sites willing to keep a connection with reality. And thanks to substack for not censoring you, as they and so many other media outlets have oft times done in the past.
Much of the third world invasion can be explained as a subtle act of war by foreign states. Peter Schweizer breaks much of it down in his book 'The Invisible Coup.' I suggest getting it as an audio book on Amazon to get the most information in a timely manner.
The subject deeply concerns me. I have relatives in Germany and Canada that fall into this trap. One embraces the COVID shot with militancy. The other, IMO embraces it, knowing its poison, for the purpose of ill-gotten gains.
Looking specifically for the defense of the aspect presented by Mark Brody on this, but thanks for the response.
Meanwhile I would recommend you look into the book titled "Suicidal Empathy" by professor Gad Saad. The problem we have here is much deeper, reaching down into the spiritual, and if want my 'root causal' factor Don Bosco covered it back when: the Truth the World Forgot https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tLJJBg-SEBY
Watched a Joe Rogan clip interviewing Gad Saad. My thoughts run deeper than Gad Saad. For example, empathy exhibited between males and females is different. Check out the video in this link explaining 'female energy' to the COVID response.
Your articles always do a great job showing statistically how these vaccines never worked.
The most significant concern is manufacturing. Pharma can’t manufacture a biologic in a year because it takes 12 years at a minimum. Scale up has to be done in 4 phases to confirm a biologic is safe and works. The phases are as follows:
- preclinical 1-2 year
- phase I 1-2 years
- phase II 2-3 years
- phase III 3-5 years
The vaccines were basically poorly manufactured substances for lack of a better word. Running stats on products that are garbage at some point is counter productive. It might be best to delve into the manufacturing reports showing all the flaws in scale up. There are many FDA inspection reports confirming issues with manufacturing. When a biologic is poorly manufactured it can injure and kill. They must be manufactured properly and 100 % sterile.
Excellent and very clear, as ever. Thanks Steve Kirsch. Your fist class stuff will be part of the historical record when, at some point in the future, sanity returns and the truth is finally exposed and accepted. If we survive the drug pushers until then. If there really was a killer virus stalking the planet and killing in 20 and 21 then we should see a rise in all cause mortality at that time. Obviously. If there was no such rise then there obviously was no such virus. If the vaccine was effective in preventing the virus from killing people then after it was deployed and widely used all cause mortality should have fallen. Obviously. If it did not fall then the vaccine was either ineffective or the cause of the increase. Obviously. These simple things can only be hidden if the data is hidden and that is clearly why it is hidden. All our greedy spineless governments jumped on the for profit vaccine bandwagon big time and profited mightily by while we suffered injury and or died. They even spent our money propagandizing us to take useless dangerous drugs. Shocking stuff even by historical standards. Now they run and hide in mute silence as their friends and relatives die. They silently pray to whatever Gods they believe in that they will not be found out, if they did not take the junk whilst pushing it on others, or not get sick by some medical miracle if they did. What a mess.
You already know that the HVE was stronger in your low-COVID baseline period than in your high-COVID period, because in your baseline period there were still many people who had recently received the first dose, and it takes about half a year after the first dose for the HVE curve to flatten out. So it was highly deceptive that you didn't mention how your finding is explained by the healthy vaccinee effect getting weaker over time.
The ratio between unvaccinated and vaccinated mortality was elevated because of HVE during your baseline period, and because of COVID during the high-COVID period: https://x.com/henjin256/status/2053712498616914096.
BTW your AI graphic is wrong because it says the baseline was on 2021-24 and the high-COVID period was between 2021-24 and 2021-40.
Kirsch now edited the post to point out that if he uses the period after the winter COVID waves as the baseline instead of the period before the winter COVID waves, then unvaccinated people have about 30% bigger increase in deaths during the winter COVID waves than vaccinated people.
He claimed the extra deaths in unvaccinated people are explained by an effect that he incorrectly calls "non-proportional hazards", by which he means that the healthy vaccinee effect causes unvaccinated people to have a disproportionately high risk of death from COVID compared to vaccinated people, so that if for example the HVE would cause unvaccinated people to have 2 times higher risk of death from all causes than vaccinated people, then if he applied an NPH factor of 1.4, HVE might cause unvaccinated people to have a 2.8 times higher risk of COVID death than vaccinated people.
He justifies the NPH adjustment by referring to a paper by Levin et al., where Kirsch said that COVID mortality hazard grows at 12.7% per year of age, even though all-cause mortality risk only grows at 8.5% per year of age, so he reasoned that HVE might similarly affect the risk of dying from COVID more than the risk of dying from all causes, because he has earlier modeled HVE in terms of unvaccinated people having elevated biological age relative to their chronological age.
But the reason why COVID deaths account for a small percentage of deaths in younger ages is because deaths from natural causes in general account for a small percentage of deaths in younger ages. In the US in 2020-2023, deaths with the underlying cause COVID accounted for about 2% of all deaths in ages 20-29 but about 8% of all deaths in ages 80-89. But deaths from natural causes accounted for only about 24% of deaths in ages 20-29 and about 96% of deaths in ages 80-89, so if you only look at deaths from natural causes, then COVID deaths accounted for about 10% of deaths in ages 20-29 but about 8% of deaths in ages 80-89, so now the percentage is similar in ages 20-29 and 80-89: https://x.com/henjin256/status/2038797975590183378.
The risk of dying from external causes does not follow a simple exponential increase, but the risk is elevated among teenagers and young adults.
For example in the US in 2024, there were about 72 times more cancer deaths among people in their 80s than people in their 20s, but there were only about 19 times more deaths from all causes among people in their 80s than people in their 20s:
So if you follow Kirsch's "NPH" logic, you might say that cancer is a "non-proportional hazard", and therefore you might expect HVE to cause unvaccinated people to have an elevated risk of dying from cancer relative to dying from other causes. But by similar reasoning, natural causes of death in general would also be "non-proportional hazards".
But let's suppose that in ages 80-89, 96% of all deaths would be deaths from natural causes, and all deaths from natural causes would be subject to NPH but no other deaths would be subject to NPH, and 20% people would be unvaccinated. Then it would be impossible for unvaccinated people to have 2 times higher mortality rate than vaccinated people from all causes but to simultaneously have 2.8 times higher mortality rate from causes subject to NPH.
Henjin’s impossibility proof assumes what I never claimed: that 96% of deaths are subject to the same COVID-specific amplification. The all-cause HVE ratio is the baseline average; COVID can sit above that average without requiring every natural cause to sit above it too.
If we were evaluating a cancer vaccine against cancer mortality, and baseline HVE was estimated from all-cause mortality, we would need to account for the fact that cancer mortality has a steeper age/frailty gradient than all-cause mortality. That is not a flaw in the method; it is the method. Your argument only becomes a contradiction after you apply the cause-specific adjustment to almost all natural deaths, which I did not do.
Please stop talking about the effect of the vaccine in a health context. The main purpose of the vaccine is financial gain for the ghouls who are pushing it. One other effect that the vaccine makers are aiming for is greatly increased poor health of anyone who takes the jab. This secondary goal is tied to the first in that greatly increased illness equals more profit for the ghoul class.
So, please do not say the vaccines do not work. They are doing exactly what their designers created them to do. Making more money for people who already have more than they can spend in many lifetimes.
The injections are sterilising, severely damaging health of and killing millions of people per country - those who live are full of self-assembling synthetic 'life' analysis pf blood by scientists shows and findings of a British whistleblower undertaker who has publicly shown long rubbery white limos whoch he finds blocking the arteries of the 'vaccinated'. His name is Mr Looney if you want to see online.
Tal cual. También en mi país, Argentina, EXPLOTARON los casos de TURBO CÁNCER, TROMBOSIS, DERRAMES CEREBRALES, HERPES ZOSTER, etc. entre VACUNADOS con estas INOCULACIONES LETALES. Quienes convalidaron estas PRÁCTICAS GENOCIDAS fueron las VÍCTIMAS de un TERRORISMO SANITARIO INÉDITO en mucho tiempo. Ni OLVIDO ni PERDÓN para estos SÁTRAPAS que DISEÑARON la FALSA PANDEMIA del MURCIÉLAGO CONTAGIADOR y que ahora pretenden hacer lo mismo con la FALSA PANDEMIA del RATÓN CONTAGIADOR.
Translation: Exactly. Also in my country, Argentina, cases of TURBO CANCER, THROMBOSIS, STROKES, HERPES ZOSTER, etc. EXPLODED among those VACCINATED with these LETHAL INOCULATIONS. Those who validated these GENOCIDAL PRACTICES were the VICTIMS of an UNPRECEDENTED HEALTH TERRORISM in a very long time. Neither FORGETTING nor FORGIVENESS for these DESPOTS who DESIGNED the FALSE PANDEMIC of the CONTAGIOUS BAT and who now intend to do the same with the FALSE PANDEMIC of the CONTAGIOUS MOUSE.
Its really amazing how the only country to release actual data is the Czech Republic. It says a lot about just how corrupt the whole global system is.
The non-release of Covid data reminds me of how the CDC has delayed the release of cancer death data. Utter incompetence - or - "something" is causing a cancer pandemic and the CDC doesn't want us to know. Tuskeegee is now happening to everyone, because nobody was punished the last time it happened.
https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/data/index.html
2022 is the latest year for which cancer incidence data are available; 2023 is the latest year for which cancer death data are available.
CDC WONDER has preliminary cancer mortality data up to 2026: https://wonder.cdc.gov/mcd.html.
This text refers to SEER, and it's outdated: "2022 is the latest year for which cancer incidence data are available; 2023 is the latest year for which cancer death data are available."
Last month SEER released incidence data for 2023 and mortality data for 2024. SEER similarly released cancer incidence data up to 2017 in April 2020, data up to 2018 in April 2021, and so on: https://seer.cancer.gov/data/data-changes.html. So the incidence data has routinely been released with a delay of 3 years.
Recently Nicolas Hulscher and Charlotte Kupperwasser posted plots of cancer incidence data from SEER, where they cherrypicked combinations of age group and cancer type that had gone up since 2021.
In a plot Hulscher made for the incidence of 5 cancer types in ages 0-49, 3 out of 5 cancer types he picked were colorectal cancers, which went up since 2021 because the screening age for CRC was lowered from 50 to 45, so the screening rate in ages 45-49 increased by about 4-fold between 2019 and the last quarter of 2022: https://x.com/henjin256/status/2052571215659708436. But there is no clear increase in the incidence of CRC in ages 15-39: https://x.com/henjin256/status/2047701140951667105.
A fourth cancer type in Hulscher's plot were non-malignant brain tumors, but their incidence went up between 2022 and 2023 because pilocytic astrocytoma was reclassified from malignant to non-malignant in 2023, which coincided with a drop in the incidence of malignant brain tumors: https://seer.cancer.gov/tools/solidtumor/revisions-dec2022.html, https://seer.cancer.gov/statistics-network/explorer/application.html?site=500&data_type=1&graph_type=2&compareBy=site&chk_site_76=76&rate_type=2&sex=1&race=1&age_range=15&hdn_stage=101&advopt_precision=1&advopt_show_ci=on&advopt_show_count=on#resultsRegion0.
But if you look at the overall age-standardized cancer incidence at SEER, there hasn't been any clear increase above the pre-COVID trend in 2021-2023: https://seer.cancer.gov/statistics-network/explorer/application.html?site=1&data_type=1&graph_type=1&compareBy=site&rate_type=2&sex=1&race=1&age_range=1&advopt_precision=1&advopt_show_ci=on#resultsRegion0.
but if you look at age <50, you do see a very troubling rise https://seer.cancer.gov/statistics-network/explorer/application.html?site=1&data_type=1&graph_type=1&compareBy=site&chk_site_20=20&chk_site_670=670&chk_site_47=47&chk_site_40=40&rate_type=2&sex=1&race=1&age_range=9&advopt_precision=1&advopt_show_ci=on#resultsRegion0
A large part of that rise is because of the increase in colorectal cancer in ages 45-49, which can be attributed to increased screening.
Ages 15-39 have no clear increase above the pre-COVID trend in overall cancer incidence: https://seer.cancer.gov/statistics-network/explorer/application.html?site=1&data_type=1&graph_type=1&compareBy=age_range&chk_age_range_9=9&chk_age_range_16=16&chk_age_range_62=62&rate_type=2&sex=1&race=1&advopt_precision=1&advopt_show_ci=on.
Cuba is a weird case that someone should investigate.
1) Soberana, the cuban vaccine which was given to nearly everyone on the island was a traditional vaccine. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soberana_02
2) The only countries with wide use of Soberana were Cuba and Iran, everyone else used either mrna or vector based vaccines (exceptions for some Indian vaccines, novavax, etc). Some doses of Soberana were given in Venezuela and other countries.
3) Cuba has a national system for collecting organ and tissue donations post mortem, all donations are processed via the same teams in the same facilities, there was no unusual staff turnover between 2019 and 2022.
4) Organ and tissue collection technicians notice the same things embalmers notice (the fibrous clots in blood vessels), this isn't news in the USA in large part because those people are minimum wage employees with few rights and high turnover, so many of the collection techs working in 2022 were not working in 2019. My anecdotal information is that the tissue techs in the USA are finding 'shrimp' and 'calamari' in their post-2021 blood samples.
5) If the fibrous clots are caused by the vector vaccines, Cuban collection technicians should be unfamiliar with them. Those vaccines were not used in Cuba.
6) Cuba has published nothing on newly observed fibrous clots starting in 2020/2021, therefore, Cuban techs have likely not seen them; there is no reason they would choose to be silent about them if they had in fact observed them.
I don't believe that anyone has asked the Cubans about this. The relevant officials' identities are not secret, and the Cuban government may permit them to answer questions, if asked by someone without hostile politics.
If the Cuban medical community has seen fibrous clots post mortem, they are probably not caused by the vector vaccines. If they have not seen them, either the fibrous clots do not exist, or they are in fact only appearing in places that used the vector vaccines.
I'm not going to call Cuba, but maybe someone else with more stature could.
FDA Tried to Hide Pfizer Document Listing Hantavirus as Side Effect of Covid Vaccine
# 513
https://granitegrok.com/blog/2022/03/fdas-list-of-1290-known-adverse-side-effects-from-the-pfizer-covid-vaccine
So the only tangible stats that can be drawn from the use of DANGEROUS if not DEADLY) mRNA injections, is that those who believed the vax hype are now more susceptible to all diseases and illnesses that they were before the jab was administered.
The only other long term conclusion will prove that those who accepted the lies about mRNA injections being SAFE and EFFECTIVE, will prove to have reduced their previous Life Expectancy. Only time will tell how much their Life Expectancy will have been reduced by studying long term evidence.
Unjabbed Mick (We live longer).
Reading Sasha's post about LNPs being the common denominator between the jabs and some new mixture being tested, I wonder how much current research is being biased by the test subjects having been vaxxed. How can we trust any results with such a polluted population?
https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/aerosolized-lipid-nanoparticles-lnps
The only tangible stats that can be drawn from the use of DANGEROUS, if not DEADLY, mRNA injections, is that those who believed Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZenica, etc, vax hype (lies) are now more susceptible to all diseases and illnesses that they were before the jab was administered. Their natural immunity from such illnesses has been destroyed by Big Parma.
The only other long term conclusion will prove that those who accepted the lies about mRNA injections being SAFE and EFFECTIVE, will prove to have reduced their previous Life Expectancy. Only time will tell how much their Life Expectancy will have been reduced by studying long term evidence.
Unjabbed Mick (We live longer).
Steve, this link is a short clip you may find of specific interest. It pertains to allergies from shot ingredients, was taken from a recent, much longer Shannon Joy interview w Sasha:
https://substack.com/@sensereceptor/note/c-250864441?r=vkjt6&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action
Not so surprising at all that public health officials, media and government refuses to engage with the data. Assuming your agenda is depopulation, poisoning, and control of the population, data is an annoying distraction from your agenda. Better to sweep it under the rug and keep it out of public awareness. Even better, call all good data "conspiracy theories". Vaccines, Amen!
Thanks for being one of the few media sites willing to keep a connection with reality. And thanks to substack for not censoring you, as they and so many other media outlets have oft times done in the past.
re: "Assuming [their] agenda is depopulation"
To support this assertion, would you care to explain WHY they want and DO import millions of immigrants mostly from 3rd would countries?
One might be prone to accept your argument their "agenda is depopulation" BUT for the wholesale importation of people.
Much of the third world invasion can be explained as a subtle act of war by foreign states. Peter Schweizer breaks much of it down in his book 'The Invisible Coup.' I suggest getting it as an audio book on Amazon to get the most information in a timely manner.
Also https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385740873_Suicidal_Empathy_The_Danger_of_Compassion_Without_Limits
The subject deeply concerns me. I have relatives in Germany and Canada that fall into this trap. One embraces the COVID shot with militancy. The other, IMO embraces it, knowing its poison, for the purpose of ill-gotten gains.
What cultivates this warped thinking? I have come to the conclusion its democrat socialist state as described in Mikkel Clair Nissen's 'Manipulism: And the Weapon of Guilt'. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aeaemg6RAa4&list=PLfNI5HyhCb7uHKFF7YKYGEJniWb-A2xI_&index=4
re: "Much of the ..."
Looking specifically for the defense of the aspect presented by Mark Brody on this, but thanks for the response.
Meanwhile I would recommend you look into the book titled "Suicidal Empathy" by professor Gad Saad. The problem we have here is much deeper, reaching down into the spiritual, and if want my 'root causal' factor Don Bosco covered it back when: the Truth the World Forgot https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tLJJBg-SEBY
Watched a Joe Rogan clip interviewing Gad Saad. My thoughts run deeper than Gad Saad. For example, empathy exhibited between males and females is different. Check out the video in this link explaining 'female energy' to the COVID response.
https://revolver.news/2024/09/spiciest-one-minute-take-on-entire-covid-sham-all-about-hysterical-female-energy/
I find it beneficial to see problems from other points of view. Thanks for pointing out Gad Saad. Hope you hear from Mark Brody.
Your articles always do a great job showing statistically how these vaccines never worked.
The most significant concern is manufacturing. Pharma can’t manufacture a biologic in a year because it takes 12 years at a minimum. Scale up has to be done in 4 phases to confirm a biologic is safe and works. The phases are as follows:
- preclinical 1-2 year
- phase I 1-2 years
- phase II 2-3 years
- phase III 3-5 years
The vaccines were basically poorly manufactured substances for lack of a better word. Running stats on products that are garbage at some point is counter productive. It might be best to delve into the manufacturing reports showing all the flaws in scale up. There are many FDA inspection reports confirming issues with manufacturing. When a biologic is poorly manufactured it can injure and kill. They must be manufactured properly and 100 % sterile.
Excellent and very clear, as ever. Thanks Steve Kirsch. Your fist class stuff will be part of the historical record when, at some point in the future, sanity returns and the truth is finally exposed and accepted. If we survive the drug pushers until then. If there really was a killer virus stalking the planet and killing in 20 and 21 then we should see a rise in all cause mortality at that time. Obviously. If there was no such rise then there obviously was no such virus. If the vaccine was effective in preventing the virus from killing people then after it was deployed and widely used all cause mortality should have fallen. Obviously. If it did not fall then the vaccine was either ineffective or the cause of the increase. Obviously. These simple things can only be hidden if the data is hidden and that is clearly why it is hidden. All our greedy spineless governments jumped on the for profit vaccine bandwagon big time and profited mightily by while we suffered injury and or died. They even spent our money propagandizing us to take useless dangerous drugs. Shocking stuff even by historical standards. Now they run and hide in mute silence as their friends and relatives die. They silently pray to whatever Gods they believe in that they will not be found out, if they did not take the junk whilst pushing it on others, or not get sick by some medical miracle if they did. What a mess.
You already know that the HVE was stronger in your low-COVID baseline period than in your high-COVID period, because in your baseline period there were still many people who had recently received the first dose, and it takes about half a year after the first dose for the HVE curve to flatten out. So it was highly deceptive that you didn't mention how your finding is explained by the healthy vaccinee effect getting weaker over time.
The ratio between unvaccinated and vaccinated mortality was elevated because of HVE during your baseline period, and because of COVID during the high-COVID period: https://x.com/henjin256/status/2053712498616914096.
BTW your AI graphic is wrong because it says the baseline was on 2021-24 and the high-COVID period was between 2021-24 and 2021-40.
yes, AI screwed up. I'll see if I can remake the graphic. The article is correct; that image is wrong. thanks!
Kirsch now edited the post to point out that if he uses the period after the winter COVID waves as the baseline instead of the period before the winter COVID waves, then unvaccinated people have about 30% bigger increase in deaths during the winter COVID waves than vaccinated people.
He claimed the extra deaths in unvaccinated people are explained by an effect that he incorrectly calls "non-proportional hazards", by which he means that the healthy vaccinee effect causes unvaccinated people to have a disproportionately high risk of death from COVID compared to vaccinated people, so that if for example the HVE would cause unvaccinated people to have 2 times higher risk of death from all causes than vaccinated people, then if he applied an NPH factor of 1.4, HVE might cause unvaccinated people to have a 2.8 times higher risk of COVID death than vaccinated people.
He justifies the NPH adjustment by referring to a paper by Levin et al., where Kirsch said that COVID mortality hazard grows at 12.7% per year of age, even though all-cause mortality risk only grows at 8.5% per year of age, so he reasoned that HVE might similarly affect the risk of dying from COVID more than the risk of dying from all causes, because he has earlier modeled HVE in terms of unvaccinated people having elevated biological age relative to their chronological age.
But the reason why COVID deaths account for a small percentage of deaths in younger ages is because deaths from natural causes in general account for a small percentage of deaths in younger ages. In the US in 2020-2023, deaths with the underlying cause COVID accounted for about 2% of all deaths in ages 20-29 but about 8% of all deaths in ages 80-89. But deaths from natural causes accounted for only about 24% of deaths in ages 20-29 and about 96% of deaths in ages 80-89, so if you only look at deaths from natural causes, then COVID deaths accounted for about 10% of deaths in ages 20-29 but about 8% of deaths in ages 80-89, so now the percentage is similar in ages 20-29 and 80-89: https://x.com/henjin256/status/2038797975590183378.
The risk of dying from external causes does not follow a simple exponential increase, but the risk is elevated among teenagers and young adults.
For example in the US in 2024, there were about 72 times more cancer deaths among people in their 80s than people in their 20s, but there were only about 19 times more deaths from all causes among people in their 80s than people in their 20s:
t=fread("curl -Ls sars2.net/f/vital.csv.xz |xz -dc")
s=t[year==2024]
s[cause%like%"C",sum(ucd[age%in%80:89])/sum(ucd[age%in%20:29])] # 71.97175
s[,sum(ucd[age%in%80:89])/sum(ucd[age%in%20:29])] # 19.44503
So if you follow Kirsch's "NPH" logic, you might say that cancer is a "non-proportional hazard", and therefore you might expect HVE to cause unvaccinated people to have an elevated risk of dying from cancer relative to dying from other causes. But by similar reasoning, natural causes of death in general would also be "non-proportional hazards".
But let's suppose that in ages 80-89, 96% of all deaths would be deaths from natural causes, and all deaths from natural causes would be subject to NPH but no other deaths would be subject to NPH, and 20% people would be unvaccinated. Then it would be impossible for unvaccinated people to have 2 times higher mortality rate than vaccinated people from all causes but to simultaneously have 2.8 times higher mortality rate from causes subject to NPH.
Henjin’s impossibility proof assumes what I never claimed: that 96% of deaths are subject to the same COVID-specific amplification. The all-cause HVE ratio is the baseline average; COVID can sit above that average without requiring every natural cause to sit above it too.
If we were evaluating a cancer vaccine against cancer mortality, and baseline HVE was estimated from all-cause mortality, we would need to account for the fact that cancer mortality has a steeper age/frailty gradient than all-cause mortality. That is not a flaw in the method; it is the method. Your argument only becomes a contradiction after you apply the cause-specific adjustment to almost all natural deaths, which I did not do.
Please stop talking about the effect of the vaccine in a health context. The main purpose of the vaccine is financial gain for the ghouls who are pushing it. One other effect that the vaccine makers are aiming for is greatly increased poor health of anyone who takes the jab. This secondary goal is tied to the first in that greatly increased illness equals more profit for the ghoul class.
So, please do not say the vaccines do not work. They are doing exactly what their designers created them to do. Making more money for people who already have more than they can spend in many lifetimes.
Actually the do work for globalists depopulation plans.
The injections are sterilising, severely damaging health of and killing millions of people per country - those who live are full of self-assembling synthetic 'life' analysis pf blood by scientists shows and findings of a British whistleblower undertaker who has publicly shown long rubbery white limos whoch he finds blocking the arteries of the 'vaccinated'. His name is Mr Looney if you want to see online.
Let me introduce:
-
Comparative Analysis of PRR and Masking in Pharmacovigilance
https://jessicar.substack.com/p/comparative-analysis-of-prr-and-masking
A Review of Two Perspectives prompted by Senator Johnson's recent Majority Staff Interim Report
Jessica Rose - May 02, 2026
-
And then some "adverse events of special interest" ...
-
5.3.6 CUMULATIVE ANALYSIS OF POST-AUTHORIZATION ADVERSE EVENT REPORTS OF PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) RECEIVED THROUGH 28-FEB-2021
https://www.phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/reissue_5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf
Table 1. General Overview: Selected Characteristics of All Cases Received During the Reporting Interval - Fatal ( page 7 )
Tabelle 6 - "Use in Pregnancy and lactation" - "Missing Information"
... and this endless
LIST OF ADVERSE EVENTS OF SPECIAL INTEREST
page 30 - 38 ( ! )
... including ( ... drumroll ... ) "Hantavirus pulmonary" to be found following the alphabetical order.
( ... look ! )
-
The conclusion: not just "Turtles All The Way Down" but organized crime for decades.
And us to end it. ( ... no more "Waiting for Godot" )
Tal cual. También en mi país, Argentina, EXPLOTARON los casos de TURBO CÁNCER, TROMBOSIS, DERRAMES CEREBRALES, HERPES ZOSTER, etc. entre VACUNADOS con estas INOCULACIONES LETALES. Quienes convalidaron estas PRÁCTICAS GENOCIDAS fueron las VÍCTIMAS de un TERRORISMO SANITARIO INÉDITO en mucho tiempo. Ni OLVIDO ni PERDÓN para estos SÁTRAPAS que DISEÑARON la FALSA PANDEMIA del MURCIÉLAGO CONTAGIADOR y que ahora pretenden hacer lo mismo con la FALSA PANDEMIA del RATÓN CONTAGIADOR.
do you have data/numbers?
Translation: Exactly. Also in my country, Argentina, cases of TURBO CANCER, THROMBOSIS, STROKES, HERPES ZOSTER, etc. EXPLODED among those VACCINATED with these LETHAL INOCULATIONS. Those who validated these GENOCIDAL PRACTICES were the VICTIMS of an UNPRECEDENTED HEALTH TERRORISM in a very long time. Neither FORGETTING nor FORGIVENESS for these DESPOTS who DESIGNED the FALSE PANDEMIC of the CONTAGIOUS BAT and who now intend to do the same with the FALSE PANDEMIC of the CONTAGIOUS MOUSE.
Because the vacinnes were con-vid
They “shaved” millions of lives …
Thanks for keeping the work going…time for Fauci to be apprehended.