I put a lot of work into a series on this subject, and I believe I was able to identify the mechanism that causes the clots to form (and surprisingly enough was consistent with what I saw in the movie).
I summarized all of it here including the references that show this happens.
https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/how-do-vaccines-ca…
I put a lot of work into a series on this subject, and I believe I was able to identify the mechanism that causes the clots to form (and surprisingly enough was consistent with what I saw in the movie).
I summarized all of it here including the references that show this happens.
•Spike Protein damages the blood vessels causing lots of clots to form.
•When the fibrin forms in the clots, the spike proteins cause it to misfold (either by locally collapsing the zeta potential or with the prion forming domain on the spike).
•Because it is misfolded, it can't be broken down (the body's enzyme does not fit) and instead only the part of the body that builds the fibrin clot continues to run so the clot gets bigger and bigger.
•Because the spike protein collapses the zeta potential, all of the blood cells stick together into microclots creating the small coffee grounds you see and the separation of plasma from blood seen in the autopsies.
•Because the mRNA was designed not to break down so a sufficient antibody response would be generated, this problem worsens with time as more and more spike protein overloads the body.
The one big thing the movie didn't go into was the profound autoimmune attack on critical organs whose tissue is expressing the spike protein found by pathologists around the world which is likely as damaging as the blood clots.
Will a blood transfusion from a vaxxed donor to an unvaxxed patient subject the patient to blood clot damage? I think a lot of us would like to know the answer. Thanks!
I know one person who ran into major issues with this, but there is no way I could actually answer that question as the data for it does not exist. That said, I am relatively sure the damage will be less than actually getting a vaccine as so much less of the initial vaccine could be present.
Are you aware of any data on how long the spike protein remains in blood after vaccination? I remember seeing one study showing up to 28 days but it was a fairly small study. And didn’t keep tracking until every single patient dropped to undetectable levels.
Your theory makes sense and would suggest that the phenomenon would stop once the spike protein clears from the blood stream.
Thanks for the explanation. My question is: is everyone who got the mRNA shot will have the clots in their lifetime no matter when, or there's a way to prevent them from forming?
Do you have any recommendations for an inexpensive source Clint? Looking online, most places seem to be charging $80/60 capsules or $160/120 capsules with a recommended dosage for therapeutic effect of 1-2...capsules...1 to 3 times a day. So potentially, 6 times a day to clear a blood clot....once per day for "maintenance". 6x per day means 120 capsules would last just 20 days....or $160 per 20 days = $8/day. Seems rather expensive of a supplement to me. If it works though....
How does "lumbrokinase" differ from "nattokinase?" I know Natto's source is fermented natto beans, found commonly in the Japanese diet were there's low rates of cardiovascular disease....
Hmm, looking it up online, it seems it is related to earthworms. Interestingly though, there is a chart on this page from what looks to be a medical journal, implying Serrapetidase is only 1/294th as effective (ish) at 40,000IU as 40,000IU of lumbrokinase. Nattokinase being 1/36th relative strength. So it does seem like a very potent clot-breaking mechanism. That's quite...interesting.
Although the numbers on the chart appear a bit "rigged" as with Lumbrokinase, they used a dosage of 300,000IU versus 20,000FU of Natto and 40,000 of Serrapetidase. Like comparing the benefit of 15 apples to one orange or two servings of broccoli on fiber content or digestion. If you increase Natto's effectivenesss by 15x to even out the dosage, Natto would become 1/2 as effective as Lumbrokinase. While if you increased serrapeptase's dosage by ~8x, to even out the dosage, its only 1/30th as effective.
I've noticed though, every time I take natto or serrapeptase, I tend to get a small lip-sore, like a boil or something? Mostly clear/see through or white with a tiny black spit in the middle. Its very strange. I find if I take a bunch of Vitamin C at the same time, this doesn't occur. I keep wondering if its like .... left-over clot-stuff that the natto/serrapeptase is removing where there's not enough anti-oxidant to get it all so it just deposits it in a high-blood or low-blood flow area.
I put a lot of work into a series on this subject, and I believe I was able to identify the mechanism that causes the clots to form (and surprisingly enough was consistent with what I saw in the movie).
I summarized all of it here including the references that show this happens.
https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/how-do-vaccines-cause-sudden-death
Essentially:
•Spike Protein damages the blood vessels causing lots of clots to form.
•When the fibrin forms in the clots, the spike proteins cause it to misfold (either by locally collapsing the zeta potential or with the prion forming domain on the spike).
•Because it is misfolded, it can't be broken down (the body's enzyme does not fit) and instead only the part of the body that builds the fibrin clot continues to run so the clot gets bigger and bigger.
•Because the spike protein collapses the zeta potential, all of the blood cells stick together into microclots creating the small coffee grounds you see and the separation of plasma from blood seen in the autopsies.
•Because the mRNA was designed not to break down so a sufficient antibody response would be generated, this problem worsens with time as more and more spike protein overloads the body.
The one big thing the movie didn't go into was the profound autoimmune attack on critical organs whose tissue is expressing the spike protein found by pathologists around the world which is likely as damaging as the blood clots.
Will a blood transfusion from a vaxxed donor to an unvaxxed patient subject the patient to blood clot damage? I think a lot of us would like to know the answer. Thanks!
I know one person who ran into major issues with this, but there is no way I could actually answer that question as the data for it does not exist. That said, I am relatively sure the damage will be less than actually getting a vaccine as so much less of the initial vaccine could be present.
Are you aware of any data on how long the spike protein remains in blood after vaccination? I remember seeing one study showing up to 28 days but it was a fairly small study. And didn’t keep tracking until every single patient dropped to undetectable levels.
Your theory makes sense and would suggest that the phenomenon would stop once the spike protein clears from the blood stream.
The short study was for a period of 28 days. They stopped collecting the data after 28 days.
Thank you for your reply. Appreciate very much!
Please find some natural supplement that can help bodies handle these clots
lumbrokinase
Thanks for the explanation. My question is: is everyone who got the mRNA shot will have the clots in their lifetime no matter when, or there's a way to prevent them from forming?
lumbrokinase
Do you have any recommendations for an inexpensive source Clint? Looking online, most places seem to be charging $80/60 capsules or $160/120 capsules with a recommended dosage for therapeutic effect of 1-2...capsules...1 to 3 times a day. So potentially, 6 times a day to clear a blood clot....once per day for "maintenance". 6x per day means 120 capsules would last just 20 days....or $160 per 20 days = $8/day. Seems rather expensive of a supplement to me. If it works though....
I’ve ordered many times from pharmacyonair.com. Comes from India. 73 cents per 12 mg tablet.
Hmm searched for lumbrokinase. Nothing came up
Sorry. I thought you were looking for ivermectin.
How does "lumbrokinase" differ from "nattokinase?" I know Natto's source is fermented natto beans, found commonly in the Japanese diet were there's low rates of cardiovascular disease....
Hmm, looking it up online, it seems it is related to earthworms. Interestingly though, there is a chart on this page from what looks to be a medical journal, implying Serrapetidase is only 1/294th as effective (ish) at 40,000IU as 40,000IU of lumbrokinase. Nattokinase being 1/36th relative strength. So it does seem like a very potent clot-breaking mechanism. That's quite...interesting.
https://www.townsendletter.com/article/lumbrokinase-an-enzyme-for-more-than-just-circulatory-health/
Although the numbers on the chart appear a bit "rigged" as with Lumbrokinase, they used a dosage of 300,000IU versus 20,000FU of Natto and 40,000 of Serrapetidase. Like comparing the benefit of 15 apples to one orange or two servings of broccoli on fiber content or digestion. If you increase Natto's effectivenesss by 15x to even out the dosage, Natto would become 1/2 as effective as Lumbrokinase. While if you increased serrapeptase's dosage by ~8x, to even out the dosage, its only 1/30th as effective.
I've noticed though, every time I take natto or serrapeptase, I tend to get a small lip-sore, like a boil or something? Mostly clear/see through or white with a tiny black spit in the middle. Its very strange. I find if I take a bunch of Vitamin C at the same time, this doesn't occur. I keep wondering if its like .... left-over clot-stuff that the natto/serrapeptase is removing where there's not enough anti-oxidant to get it all so it just deposits it in a high-blood or low-blood flow area.
Very good question! I would like to hear the response as well.
Malone/Cole/Hazan, they notice ivermectin is helping, please check flccc protocols.