We have about 50 interesting people… doctors, athletes, pharmacists, victims, parents of victims, statisticians, etc.
Each person has a story.
We make a series of 2 minute videos.
Each video starts off with the person introducing him/herself and then saying their unique viewpoint.
All videos end with telling the viewer that it’s important that you get all the facts before you decide because you can’t reverse this decision. Direct people to the vacsafety.org website to hear both sides. And we have two 15 minute videos, one from the pro side, the other from the con side.
We think our 15 minute video will be better than the CDC’s video.
If we are correct regarding vaccinating our children, the next time you hear about Virginia it will not involve geography. Virginia will be leading a an angry cohort of American moms. And, that should be the focus. Just $.02.
Thanks for your courage. A pharmacist of 30 some odd years and never expected to spend a weekend compiling a joint religious/ medical exemption request. They have no idea what is coming. I’ve spent 5 hours a night reading, listening, and reviewing everything I could find. I stood in the boardroom explaining we are running our business based upon a PCR test yielding 96% false positives.
Willful Ignorance has no bottom.
I think commercials about the injured are a great idea, but would be better if posed as a call to action rather than an effort to persuade. E.g., commercials showing vaccine victims should urge the viewer to demand that Big Pharma be held accountable by asking their Congressmen to repeal the PREP act. In such a commercial, Big Pharma profits can be listed alongside the VAERS death graph. This way, the viewer can focus their negative emotions on pharma rather than their own mistaken preconceptions.
An alternate ad could be ostensibly targeted at vaccine injured, with (an honest) offer to provide medical and/or legal aid. Such an ad could list the possible adverse symptoms to watch for (chest tightness, headaches, fatigue). This way, anyone who suffered a reaction that was dismissed by their doctor as “not related” would see that others have experienced the same thing, and begin to wonder. Such ads might also come in the form of mail campaigns and/or flyers.
Since the truth goes against the recommendations of trusted physicians and leaders, it will take a subtle approach to change minds (at least until ADE becomes too obvious to ignore). The best we can do with an entrenched position is to plant a seed of doubt, and hope it leads them ultimately to the truth.