There are 60,000 pediatricians in the US. Oddly, not a single one will take the entire CDC vaccination schedule in one sitting. It is legal and ethical. And we KNOW it is safe because experts say so.
What a long-winded way to announce that you don’t understand pharmacokinetics. You want pediatricians (who do understand it) to take 18 years worth of vaccinations in a single sitting, even though many of them *already had all of those* in the first 18 years of life.
If you take 18 years worth of Tylenol, or vitamin A, or really… anything in a *single sitting* you will die. Food. Water. Deep tissue massages. Routine blood draws. Dead in all cases.
You probably won’t die with vaccines (as proven by a certain German grifter below), but you might still have some unwanted side effects -and why would anyone take those on when it only serves to prove that the co-inventor of the optical mouse is an overconfident imbecile with respect to rudimentary biology?
I am shcoked there is not a podcast dedicated to this. It may not reach a high level audoence on day one. But it seems to me there would be a big appetite for this on many topics. I have had the idea myself for at least 5yrs. One of Rogan's (and everyone else) big weaknesses has always seemed to me, to be be that you get 2 or 3 hours of one unchecked opinion. Anyone can make any case, unchallenged. Those controversial topics should always have representatives of both sides of the debate.
It leans on a misleading premise, as vaccine safety is established through large-scale clinical trials and population data, not extreme demonstrations that fall outside recommended medical use. Confidence in vaccines comes from decades of evidence-based outcomes, not from unnecessary or unscientific stunts.
ALL SO CALLED VACCINES REDUCE ONES IMMUNE SYSTEM BECAUSE OF THE CARRIER FLUID.
FAR BETTER TO BUILD UP ONES IMMUNE SYSTEM. DIFFICULT WITH MODERN PROCESSES FOODS. BIG PHARMA RELYS ON JABS BUT A BABY OF MINE WILL NEVER GET JABBED LIKE A PIN CUSION. WAS BROUGHT UP IN WWII AND NO JABS JUST REAL FOOD.
Is THAT all you got???? That comment WALLOWS IN LAMENESS!!!!!!!!! At least he is NOT a delusional 'yes man' like you appear to be. You onboard with pumping an INFANT up with massive amounts of Aluminum in the form of 'vaccines' when their own immune system is not in place until AGE TWO...yeah, those incentives will get most docs every time. Being a sellout to humanity takes YEARS of training! I will add you to my prayer list.
“Babies emerge from the relatively sterile environment of the womb into a world teeming with bacteria, viruses and other microorganisms, and their immune systems are designed to stand up to these challenges from the start,” explains Dr. Offit. “Newborns have billions of immunologic cells that are capable of responding to millions of different microorganisms. By quickly making an immune response to bacteria that live on the surface of their intestines, for example, babies are able to keep those bacteria from invading their bloodstream and causing serious disease.”
Current research shows that young infants are fully capable of generating protective immune responses to multiple vaccines given simultaneously. “Our analysis shows that infants have the theoretical capacity to respond to about 10,000 vaccines at once. Currently, the most vaccines that children receive at one time is five,” says Dr. Offit. “Using this estimate, we could predict that even if all 11 of the routinely recommended vaccinations were given to infants at one time, only about .01 percent of the immune system would be used.”
Infants today actually receive fewer substances in vaccines that stimulate an immune response than they did 40 or 100 years ago While there has been a substantial increase in the number of routine childhood vaccines over the past several decades, “Parents who are concerned about the growing number of vaccinations recommended for their children may take comfort in knowing that children are actually exposed to fewer antigens -- proteins that stimulate an immune response -- in the vaccines they receive today than in the past,” says Dr. Offit. “Vaccine formulations have been refined and simplified over the years. Although we currently give children more vaccines than in the past, the actual number of antigens they receive has declined significantly. Whereas previously one vaccine, smallpox, contained about 200 antigens, now the 11 routinely recommended childhood vaccines contain fewer than 130 antigens combined.”
Mild to moderate illness does not affect an infant’s ability to generate protective immune responses to vaccines Some parents worry that vaccinating children who have minor illnesses makes it less likely that they will develop a protective immune response and more likely that they will develop an adverse reaction to the vaccine than healthy children. However, says Dr. Offit, data do not support this fear. “Studies have found that the presence of a minor to moderate illness such as an upper respiratory tract infection, ear infection, skin infection, fever or diarrhea does not compromise a child’s ability to respond to vaccines or increase the risk of an adverse vaccine reaction.”
“Because of the success of our immunization program, incidences of many vaccine-preventable diseases in this country are at an all-time low. This in turn has led some parents to question whether vaccines are really still necessary for their child,” says Dr. Offit. “It is important to realize, however, that these vaccine-preventable diseases have not been eliminated. Some, like measles, mumps and rubella, continue to circulate at low levels in our population. Other, like diphtheria and polio, continue to cause outbreaks in other parts of the world and remain only a plane ride away. History tells us that if immunization rates were to drop, even by as little as 10 @ 15 percent, we would soon face a resurgence of these diseases and the devastating effects associated with them.”
“Immunizations are extremely safe and highly effective at preventing disease and death, and are one of the most important steps parents can take to protect their children,” says Dr. Offit. “Our report can offer parents reassurance that by immunizing their infants, they are affording them maximum protection against serious infectious diseases with minimum risk, helping their immune systems to become stronger, and giving them the healthiest possible start in life.”
Seems to me you are misrepresenting his ACTUAL WORDS, no?
Congratulations. You've rediscovered what is obviously a variant of very old antivax crank "challenge" first popularized (to the best of my recollection) by Jock Doubleday two decades ago. Even more hilarious, you didn't even think of it yourself. You had to use AI.🤣
There is no logical response to this question, from which AAP could argue. You’d think that for the ‘best health of our kids’ at least one of the sixty thousand pediatricians would step up? Steve Kirsch, once again has detonated a nuclear device to the tired propaganda weaponry used against civilians over decades. Well done!
I do like your proposal, but unfortunately both you and the AAP know injecting all those toxins, ( they are undeniably toxic ), in a short time period would be suicide, ( welcome or not ). The AAP is far and away the number one disseminator of the profitable vaccines. When you're looking at that much money being potentially removed from your practice it becomes convenient to ignore patient risk. It's not their kids.
Tell that to my cousin and his wife whose infant DIED the day after getting several 'vaccines' and they said it was SIDS....kinda like SAD that was NEVER a thing until the introduction of the C19 shots...but NOTHING TO SEE HERE FOLKS....MOVE ALONG until the next MANUFACTURED CRISIS and DEPOP EVENT!!!!!
Through the Amish people we have data from a life time long placebo study, but Big Pharma lobbyist tells and pays the corrupt CDC not to use that data.
Among the Amish people, who doesn’t use vaccines at all, they have 0 cases of ADHD, 0 cases of Autism and 0 cases of autoimmune diseases in children under the age of 16.
It is very easy to look into the economy of so called civil servants, and then ask them, >how come you’re good for millions< but for “some reason” we never do.
in addition to your points, The Japanese delayed all vaccines until a child is AGE TWO...and VOILA! No SIDS and many so-called common place issues that have plagued most children are NOT PRESENT! God will be the final arbitor of TRUTH and the docs can run and hide--but it won't help them from THE TRUTH!
I agree! Most of the 'docs' commenting here have ONLY been telling us how we don't know what we are talking about--NOT ONE said they will step up to the challenge...wonder why? [Not really--I have Extreme Discernment for the TRUTH].
What a long-winded way to announce that you don’t understand pharmacokinetics. You want pediatricians (who do understand it) to take 18 years worth of vaccinations in a single sitting, even though many of them *already had all of those* in the first 18 years of life.
If you take 18 years worth of Tylenol, or vitamin A, or really… anything in a *single sitting* you will die. Food. Water. Deep tissue massages. Routine blood draws. Dead in all cases.
You probably won’t die with vaccines (as proven by a certain German grifter below), but you might still have some unwanted side effects -and why would anyone take those on when it only serves to prove that the co-inventor of the optical mouse is an overconfident imbecile with respect to rudimentary biology?
Thanks for coming to my TED talk! https://absurdlyrational.substack.com/p/the-german-grifter-who-proved-rfk?r=2w6nuh&utm_medium=ios
I am shcoked there is not a podcast dedicated to this. It may not reach a high level audoence on day one. But it seems to me there would be a big appetite for this on many topics. I have had the idea myself for at least 5yrs. One of Rogan's (and everyone else) big weaknesses has always seemed to me, to be be that you get 2 or 3 hours of one unchecked opinion. Anyone can make any case, unchallenged. Those controversial topics should always have representatives of both sides of the debate.
It leans on a misleading premise, as vaccine safety is established through large-scale clinical trials and population data, not extreme demonstrations that fall outside recommended medical use. Confidence in vaccines comes from decades of evidence-based outcomes, not from unnecessary or unscientific stunts.
It is a TELL that bill GATES OF HELL would NOT vaccinate ANY of his children....seems very odd!
Whose lives do I value above my own? Answer…my children’s.
That’s why all three of them have had the full vaccine schedule.
….Next?
ALL SO CALLED VACCINES REDUCE ONES IMMUNE SYSTEM BECAUSE OF THE CARRIER FLUID.
FAR BETTER TO BUILD UP ONES IMMUNE SYSTEM. DIFFICULT WITH MODERN PROCESSES FOODS. BIG PHARMA RELYS ON JABS BUT A BABY OF MINE WILL NEVER GET JABBED LIKE A PIN CUSION. WAS BROUGHT UP IN WWII AND NO JABS JUST REAL FOOD.
Every day you get dumber and dumber. Really pathetic your life peaked at stuffing an LED into a computer mouse.
Is THAT all you got???? That comment WALLOWS IN LAMENESS!!!!!!!!! At least he is NOT a delusional 'yes man' like you appear to be. You onboard with pumping an INFANT up with massive amounts of Aluminum in the form of 'vaccines' when their own immune system is not in place until AGE TWO...yeah, those incentives will get most docs every time. Being a sellout to humanity takes YEARS of training! I will add you to my prayer list.
This comment is even dumber than Kirch's post
Dr Paul Offit ACTUALLY SAID:
“Babies emerge from the relatively sterile environment of the womb into a world teeming with bacteria, viruses and other microorganisms, and their immune systems are designed to stand up to these challenges from the start,” explains Dr. Offit. “Newborns have billions of immunologic cells that are capable of responding to millions of different microorganisms. By quickly making an immune response to bacteria that live on the surface of their intestines, for example, babies are able to keep those bacteria from invading their bloodstream and causing serious disease.”
Current research shows that young infants are fully capable of generating protective immune responses to multiple vaccines given simultaneously. “Our analysis shows that infants have the theoretical capacity to respond to about 10,000 vaccines at once. Currently, the most vaccines that children receive at one time is five,” says Dr. Offit. “Using this estimate, we could predict that even if all 11 of the routinely recommended vaccinations were given to infants at one time, only about .01 percent of the immune system would be used.”
Infants today actually receive fewer substances in vaccines that stimulate an immune response than they did 40 or 100 years ago While there has been a substantial increase in the number of routine childhood vaccines over the past several decades, “Parents who are concerned about the growing number of vaccinations recommended for their children may take comfort in knowing that children are actually exposed to fewer antigens -- proteins that stimulate an immune response -- in the vaccines they receive today than in the past,” says Dr. Offit. “Vaccine formulations have been refined and simplified over the years. Although we currently give children more vaccines than in the past, the actual number of antigens they receive has declined significantly. Whereas previously one vaccine, smallpox, contained about 200 antigens, now the 11 routinely recommended childhood vaccines contain fewer than 130 antigens combined.”
Mild to moderate illness does not affect an infant’s ability to generate protective immune responses to vaccines Some parents worry that vaccinating children who have minor illnesses makes it less likely that they will develop a protective immune response and more likely that they will develop an adverse reaction to the vaccine than healthy children. However, says Dr. Offit, data do not support this fear. “Studies have found that the presence of a minor to moderate illness such as an upper respiratory tract infection, ear infection, skin infection, fever or diarrhea does not compromise a child’s ability to respond to vaccines or increase the risk of an adverse vaccine reaction.”
“Because of the success of our immunization program, incidences of many vaccine-preventable diseases in this country are at an all-time low. This in turn has led some parents to question whether vaccines are really still necessary for their child,” says Dr. Offit. “It is important to realize, however, that these vaccine-preventable diseases have not been eliminated. Some, like measles, mumps and rubella, continue to circulate at low levels in our population. Other, like diphtheria and polio, continue to cause outbreaks in other parts of the world and remain only a plane ride away. History tells us that if immunization rates were to drop, even by as little as 10 @ 15 percent, we would soon face a resurgence of these diseases and the devastating effects associated with them.”
“Immunizations are extremely safe and highly effective at preventing disease and death, and are one of the most important steps parents can take to protect their children,” says Dr. Offit. “Our report can offer parents reassurance that by immunizing their infants, they are affording them maximum protection against serious infectious diseases with minimum risk, helping their immune systems to become stronger, and giving them the healthiest possible start in life.”
Seems to me you are misrepresenting his ACTUAL WORDS, no?
He is an anti-vaxxer so it's a given they will misrepresent things.
Congratulations. You've rediscovered what is obviously a variant of very old antivax crank "challenge" first popularized (to the best of my recollection) by Jock Doubleday two decades ago. Even more hilarious, you didn't even think of it yourself. You had to use AI.🤣
And what, in the end, does it actually prove, to quote Edwin Starr of War: "Absolutely Nothin' (say it again y'all!)"
There is no logical response to this question, from which AAP could argue. You’d think that for the ‘best health of our kids’ at least one of the sixty thousand pediatricians would step up? Steve Kirsch, once again has detonated a nuclear device to the tired propaganda weaponry used against civilians over decades. Well done!
[massive applause ensues]!!!!
I do like your proposal, but unfortunately both you and the AAP know injecting all those toxins, ( they are undeniably toxic ), in a short time period would be suicide, ( welcome or not ). The AAP is far and away the number one disseminator of the profitable vaccines. When you're looking at that much money being potentially removed from your practice it becomes convenient to ignore patient risk. It's not their kids.
NAILED IT!
A much simpler way of showing anti-vaxxers are wrong is simply showing they cannot count the number of vaccines on the schedule:
https://thescamdoctor.substack.com/p/no-child-has-ever-received-72-vaccines?r=6hgshq
Tell that to my cousin and his wife whose infant DIED the day after getting several 'vaccines' and they said it was SIDS....kinda like SAD that was NEVER a thing until the introduction of the C19 shots...but NOTHING TO SEE HERE FOLKS....MOVE ALONG until the next MANUFACTURED CRISIS and DEPOP EVENT!!!!!
Paul Offit should take the 10,000 shots he claimed that children could take.
Through the Amish people we have data from a life time long placebo study, but Big Pharma lobbyist tells and pays the corrupt CDC not to use that data.
Among the Amish people, who doesn’t use vaccines at all, they have 0 cases of ADHD, 0 cases of Autism and 0 cases of autoimmune diseases in children under the age of 16.
It is very easy to look into the economy of so called civil servants, and then ask them, >how come you’re good for millions< but for “some reason” we never do.
in addition to your points, The Japanese delayed all vaccines until a child is AGE TWO...and VOILA! No SIDS and many so-called common place issues that have plagued most children are NOT PRESENT! God will be the final arbitor of TRUTH and the docs can run and hide--but it won't help them from THE TRUTH!
EXCELLENT 👍👍👍♥️♥️♥️
What an AWESOME idea https://substack.com/@stevekirsch! Let's see how many of these lousers will do it!
You are the best!
I agree! Most of the 'docs' commenting here have ONLY been telling us how we don't know what we are talking about--NOT ONE said they will step up to the challenge...wonder why? [Not really--I have Extreme Discernment for the TRUTH].