No the ball is on your side, you claimed they do not exist, there is plenty of evidence about to suggest otherwise. You are the one who claims it is all lies. Prove it if you want to be judge and jury. I would suggest you read Mike Yeadons response below.
No the ball is on your side, you claimed they do not exist, there is plenty of evidence about to suggest otherwise. You are the one who claims it is all lies. Prove it if you want to be judge and jury. I would suggest you read Mike Yeadons response below.
You are straw manning me and it is a logical fallacy by misrepresenting my argument which is things which are claimed to be real are not proven to be real. Thus the burden of proof is still on those who claim them being real as per logic.
Mike Yeadon learned from me that viruses are not proven few years ago when I asked him if viruses are proven with adherence to scientific method.
I would suggest you not bothering people if you have no valid arguments to present next time..
No mate, I am not, their is decades of evidence from the other side of science that has been published. Ain't seen nothing of substance from you or the rest.
No the ball is on your side, you claimed they do not exist, there is plenty of evidence about to suggest otherwise. You are the one who claims it is all lies. Prove it if you want to be judge and jury. I would suggest you read Mike Yeadons response below.
SD, you wrote * & I quote; "you claimed they do not exist," actually Kordelas states;.........."never been proven".
You are straw manning me and it is a logical fallacy by misrepresenting my argument which is things which are claimed to be real are not proven to be real. Thus the burden of proof is still on those who claim them being real as per logic.
Mike Yeadon learned from me that viruses are not proven few years ago when I asked him if viruses are proven with adherence to scientific method.
I would suggest you not bothering people if you have no valid arguments to present next time..
No mate, I am not, their is decades of evidence from the other side of science that has been published. Ain't seen nothing of substance from you or the rest.
Yes, you are. And you still have not presented any valid evidence of your claims.
You have no valid arguments so far.
Well mate if you schooled Mike Yeadon, produce the evidence to back yourself. That is all that has been asked of you.