Wrong. By logic the burden of proof is on initial claimants and their supporters, not on those who question or deny their claims. Also it is not even a scientific theory. For this a hypothesis has to be tested by conducting an experiment on a real independent variable.
"Burden of Proof
Informal
This fallacy originates from the Latin phrase "onus probandi incumbit ei qui dicit, non ei qui negat"). The burden of proof is on the person who makes the claim, not on the person who denies (or questions) the claim. The fallacy of the Burden of Proof occurs when someone who is making a claim, puts the burden of proof on another party to disprove what they are claiming."
It keeps coming back to naming certain particles and claiming THESE must be the "cause" of disease. The fact is, toxic assaults and malnutrition are the actual cause. Locating some maggots on road kill is NOT evidence that the maggots killed the animal.
You have convinced me of something today, kordelas.
By bludgeoning me in the comment section and leaving vacuous generalities - both hallmarks of trolls - I'm convinced more than ever that 'not a virus' is an op.
please considerthe followinghttps://duckduckgo.com/?q=sewerage+divers+india&t=ffab&atb=v223-1&iar=images&iax=images&ia=images id love to see your reasoning, deductions, extrapolations etc etc ,,, i dove a bit into this ... and am led to conclude from just facts as impartial as i can be...that ... fact 1 the divers have been doing this for years and generations wit no observable ill effect etc etc we are all searching for the truth'
How does this square with sanitation is correlated with the improvement of health, not vaccines?
Intriguing plus the added chemicals in products must be impacting their health.
Are their life spans cut short? I lived in India for a year many decades ago.....those people are beasts of burden. Women on roadsides chopping up rocks into gravel hours at a time in beating sun and heat, men as skinny as rails bicycling heavy loads....don't know how they do it, but they don't live long.
i think [speculate ] the micro organisms break down everything chemicals etc etc into their basic conponents... recyclers back to earth ,,, there are microorganisms even in radioactive cooling structures in nucular power plants ...to me all this is a major substantion of beuchamp terrain hypothesis good luck
Your beliefs are not valid evidence.
The burden of proof is still on those who claim existence of exosomes, viruses, pathogenic bacteria, phages, nucleotides and immune system.
So provide valid evidence or admit that you do not have it.
the burden of proof is on the person challenging the existing theory.
It's an hypothesis, not a theory.
No, it isn't. This theory is only believed for a long time, but has, in fact, never been proven in the first place.
The burden of proof is on the person making the claim - science is about falsifiability - can we get back to our natural sensibilities..
Wrong. By logic the burden of proof is on initial claimants and their supporters, not on those who question or deny their claims. Also it is not even a scientific theory. For this a hypothesis has to be tested by conducting an experiment on a real independent variable.
"Burden of Proof
Informal
This fallacy originates from the Latin phrase "onus probandi incumbit ei qui dicit, non ei qui negat"). The burden of proof is on the person who makes the claim, not on the person who denies (or questions) the claim. The fallacy of the Burden of Proof occurs when someone who is making a claim, puts the burden of proof on another party to disprove what they are claiming."
It keeps coming back to naming certain particles and claiming THESE must be the "cause" of disease. The fact is, toxic assaults and malnutrition are the actual cause. Locating some maggots on road kill is NOT evidence that the maggots killed the animal.
I have been teaching people about it since the beginning of 2020 on social media platforms.
Yeah, right.
Go to Russia and find out yourself.
The burden of proof is not on me as per logic.
You have convinced me of something today, kordelas.
By bludgeoning me in the comment section and leaving vacuous generalities - both hallmarks of trolls - I'm convinced more than ever that 'not a virus' is an op.
Thanks for the enlightenment.
So you are unhappy because I logically refuted your arguments.
Lol.
please considerthe followinghttps://duckduckgo.com/?q=sewerage+divers+india&t=ffab&atb=v223-1&iar=images&iax=images&ia=images id love to see your reasoning, deductions, extrapolations etc etc ,,, i dove a bit into this ... and am led to conclude from just facts as impartial as i can be...that ... fact 1 the divers have been doing this for years and generations wit no observable ill effect etc etc we are all searching for the truth'
How does this square with sanitation is correlated with the improvement of health, not vaccines?
Intriguing plus the added chemicals in products must be impacting their health.
Are their life spans cut short? I lived in India for a year many decades ago.....those people are beasts of burden. Women on roadsides chopping up rocks into gravel hours at a time in beating sun and heat, men as skinny as rails bicycling heavy loads....don't know how they do it, but they don't live long.
i think [speculate ] the micro organisms break down everything chemicals etc etc into their basic conponents... recyclers back to earth ,,, there are microorganisms even in radioactive cooling structures in nucular power plants ...to me all this is a major substantion of beuchamp terrain hypothesis good luck