Hanta normally spreads from airborne dried mouse-rat droppings and urine particles inhalation by humans; not via human to human.
There are some signs the WHO is trying to promote the idea this occurrence could be human to human.... It's more likely that keeping people confined to cabins ventilated with possibly contaminated air instead going on deck to get fresh air, increased the risk of further infections.
This is consistent with the type of bad advice, essentially contrary to common sense and science, that was being put out during the cv19 operation.
Hanta virus is also RNA (like cv19), and of a type that could be fought with Ivermectin, but, of course, AI queries say it won't work for Hanta, just as AI said for cv19.
Weinstein is considered a very competent source by many.
GoogleGemini has this to say:
------- How is hantavirus spread as an infection in humans?
" Hantavirus is not spread the way many common viruses are—you can’t catch it from another person coughing or sneezing on you. Instead, it is a zoonotic virus, meaning it jumps from animals to humans. Specifically, it is carried by certain species of rodents.
Here is exactly how the virus spreads from rodents to humans:
1. Airborne Inhalation (The Most Common Way)
The primary way people get infected is by breathing in microscopic particles of the virus.
The Source: The virus is shed in the urine, droppings, and saliva of infected rodents (such as deer mice, white-footed mice, cotton rats, or rice rats).
The Trigger: When fresh rodent urine, droppings, or nesting materials are disturbed—often by sweeping, dusting, or moving things in closed spaces—tiny viral particles become airborne.
The Infection: You breathe in these contaminated particles, and the virus enters your lungs. This process is known as airborne transmission via aerosolized dust.
2. Direct Contact
You can also contract the virus by physically touching contaminated materials and then transferring the virus to your own body.
If you touch rodent urine, droppings, or nesting material and then immediately touch your mouth, nose, or eyes, the virus can enter through your mucous membranes.
3. Rodent Bites
While much less common, if an infected rodent bites you and breaks the skin, the virus can be transmitted directly through its infected saliva.
4. Ingestion
On rare occasions, eating food or drinking water that has been contaminated by the waste of an infected rodent can lead to infection.
Where Do Exposures Usually Happen?
Most people contract hantavirus in rural or semi-rural areas where rodents find shelter. Common exposure sites include:
Opening or cleaning closed-up cabins, sheds, barns, or outbuildings.
Cleaning areas that have been vacant for a while (like a garage or attic).
Working in crawl spaces, under houses, or in fields.
Hiking or camping in areas where rodents live.
⚠️ Important Note on Human-to-Human Spread: In North America, the types of hantavirus that cause Hantavirus Pulmonary Syndrome (HPS) are strictly non-contagious between humans. You cannot catch it from holding hands, kissing, or breathing the same air as an infected patient. (Note: A rare strain called Andes virus in South America has shown limited person-to-person spread, but this is the
exception, not the rule). "
------ Is hantavirus RNA type?
"Yes, hantavirus is an RNA virus.
Specifically, it belongs to the Bunyaviridae family (or more recently, the Hantaviridae family) and consists of enveloped, single-stranded, negative-sense RNA.
How its RNA structure works:
Segmented Genome: Its RNA is split into three distinct segments, usually referred to as:
L (Large): Encodes the viral RNA polymerase, which allows the virus to replicate.
M (Medium): Encodes the surface glycoproteins (G
n
and G
c
), which help the virus attach to and invade host cells.
S (Small): Encodes the nucleocapsid protein, which protects the viral RNA.
Negative-Sense ($[-]$RNA): This means the viral RNA cannot be directly translated into proteins by the host cell's machinery. Instead, the virus must first use its own polymerase to transcribe the negative-sense RNA into a positive-sense mRNA strand before it can replicate and hijack the host cell.
Because it is an RNA virus, it replicates within the cytoplasm of the host's cells rather than entering the cell nucleus."
Is there any proof that viruses actually exist?
" Yes, there is overwhelming, undeniable scientific proof that viruses exist. Because viruses are incredibly tiny—vastly smaller than bacteria—we couldn't actually see them for a long time, which led to early skepticism.
However, over the last century, advances in technology have allowed us to isolate, image, genetically sequence, and even manipulate them.
Here is the definitive proof of their existence, broken down by how we know they are real:
1. We Can See Them (Electron Microscopy)
You cannot see a virus with a standard school microscope because viruses are smaller than the wavelength of visible light. However, in the 1930s, the invention of the Electron Microscope changed everything. Instead of light, it uses a beam of electrons to image objects at the nanometer scale.
In 1939, scientists captured the very first images of a virus (the Tobacco Mosaic Virus). Today, we have high-resolution, 3D images of thousands of different viruses, showing their distinct shapes, from the soccer-ball-like structure of adenoviruses to the lunar-lander shape of bacteriophages (viruses that infect bacteria).
2. We Can Sequence Their Genetic Material (DNA/RNA)
Just like humans, animals, and bacteria, viruses have their own unique genetic blueprints. We can extract this genetic material, map it, and read it using genomic sequencing.
When a new illness appears (like SARS-CoV-2 in late 2019), scientists can isolate the virus from a patient and map its entire RNA sequence within days.
This genetic proof is what allows us to create highly specific diagnostic tests (like PCR tests). A PCR test doesn't look for symptoms; it looks for the exact, unique chemical sequence of the virus's RNA. If the virus didn't exist, these tests would not work with such pinpoint accuracy.
3. We Can Isolate and Grow Them (Koch’s Postulates)
In virology, scientists use a modified version of "Koch’s Postulates" to prove a specific germ causes a specific disease. We can:
Take a sample from a sick host and isolate the specific viral particles.
Grow that virus in a laboratory setting (using cell cultures, since viruses need living cells to replicate).
Introduce that isolated virus to a healthy organism, which then develops the exact same disease.
Re-isolate the identical virus from the newly infected host.
This rigorous process proves not only that the virus exists, but that it is the direct cause of the illness.
4. We Can Watch Them Replicate and Crystallize
In 1935, scientist Wendell Stanley successfully crystallized the Tobacco Mosaic Virus, proving it was a distinct, tangible chemical structure made of protein and RNA.
Furthermore, using modern time-lapse cryo-electron microscopy, scientists can literally watch the life cycle of a virus in real-time: attaching to a host cell, injecting its genetic material, hijacking the cell's machinery to mass-produce copies of itself, and bursting out of the cell to infect others. "
Sure. Here's what you do: the most direct of the claims of the proof of existence of viruses is the claim that they can be seen with electron microscopes. Go after that and prove they are mistaken or lying. If you're right, it should be simple.
Lmfao 😂😆🤣 Those EM pics you hold in such high regard are produced after researchers subject monkey kidney cells to a chemical torture chamber — antibiotics, reagents, starvation media, toxic additives, and other stressors specifically designed to induce cytopathic effects.
Then the sample gets put through an even harsher preparation process for electron microscopy: chemical fixation, dehydration, heavy-metal staining, resin embedding, ultrathin sectioning, vacuum exposure, and bombardment with an electron beam — all procedures openly acknowledged to create distortions and artefacts.
After all that abuse, a white coat slaps an arrow on a blurry blob with little spikes and triumphantly declares: “Behold — a novel coronavirus!” 😂
The awkward problem is that researchers have demonstrated the same images can be produced in control cultures without adding any patient snot, saliva, or alleged viral isolate at all. In other words, the process itself is capable of generating the very cytopathic effects and particle imagery later claimed as “proof” of a virus.
That’s not rigorous science — that’s interpretation layered on top of assumption.
Before the cv19 mass murder operation put on by the medical-pharma establishment, and Western govts., I would have assumed you were at least exaggerating. And, of course, if the existence of something dangerous can be sold, so can the necessity for funding its research, prevention measures, etc.
The recent Dr Ardis show on Lupus cure highlights the very nasty "side effects" HCQ gives as one of the 3 main drug treatments for Lupus, so beware of using it very long. Lupus is a parasite, so maybe the other natural treatments like fenbendazole would work also?
EVERYONE IS WATCHING THE HANTAVIRUS SCARE BUT MISSED THE REAL SCANDAL
They just blew their own cover 💥
They just proved they knew all about the *vaccine* dangers before COVID‼️
The U.S. Army/NIAID biodefense world had already tested a genetic-instruction hantavirus vaccine in humans.
Enrollment: Feb. 19, 2019 – Nov. 4, 2019
Developed by USAMRIID / Fort Detrick.
Supported by NIAID / NIH + the Military Infectious Disease Program.
Manufactured/supported by Aldevron.
Delivered by PharmaJet needle-free injection.
This one did NOT even use lipid nanoparticles, which cause even more damage, to help it enter our cells.
And even without LNPs:
⚠️98% had local adverse events.
⚠️65% had systemic adverse events.
⚠️15% of vaccine recipients had related Grade 3 symptoms.
It is now crystal clear that long BEFORE COVID, federal biodefense actors already had human data showing genetic-instruction vaccine platforms were highly reactogenic and dangerous❗️
That matters legally
Under EUA law, recipients were REQUIRED to be informed of the significant known and POTENTIAL risks and “the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown.” 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii).
FDA labeling rules also require warnings when there is reasonable evidence of a clinically significant hazard causation does not have to be definitively proven first. 21 C.F.R. § 201.57(c)(6)(i).
**They have yet to update their labels for what we already know currently: Spikevax, RSV mNEXSPIKE…
And informed-consent regulations REQUIRE disclosure of reasonably FORESEEABLE RISKS or discomforts. 21 C.F.R. § 50.25.
So if federal actors already knew genetic vaccine platforms could produce widespread reactions, and they failed to disclose that platform history and unknowns before pushing COVID mRNA products, that is not just an oversight….not just an oopsie.
That is a direct informed-consent and EUA disclosure failure.
The Empire Strikes Back--the recent firing of Marty Makary and Tracy Høeg. Doesn't Robert Kennedy Jr., as head of the HHS, which overseas the FDA, have any input or control over the corrupt house cleaning at the FDA?
"Hantavirus spreads primarily from infected rodents to humans, especially through exposure to aerosolized rodent urine, droppings, or saliva in enclosed spaces."
The elephant in the room: there's no direct isolation of any Hantavirus (or any other pathogenic microbe).
I love your work Steve, but please investigate virus isolation methods - once you see the fraud, you can't unsee it.
Hackman and Arakawa was discovered to have turned into a "breeding ground for infestation" earlier this week after numerous dead rodents, droppings, and nests were discovered all over the property.
But NO RATS, rat dropping or any evidence of rats were found inside the house and direct living quarters. Rats were in “outbuildings,” a common circumstance.
The scientific consensus is that the news media are transmitting dangerous frequencies and people should instead listen to music tuned to 528 Hz. Concerts should be organized to bring these frequencies to a wider audience.
Quinta Columna from Spain has proposed that there is not a true Hanta pandemic; instead something more deadly. They are activating 26GHz by the 5G & 6G antennas. That has a devastating effect on the graphene oxide in your body and hence, a horrific effect on one’s body. Hard to evade the frequencies being emitted. The 26GHz is on cruise ships, planes and stadiums (note this is the year of the world cup games). Please consider. Quinta columna was part of the leading edge proving graphene oxide was in the jab. The antenas are weapons. If this perspective is true, this will be a horror show. Quinta columna says get out of the cities. We need the frequency weapons against mankind not to be used. As a side note, Economist 12/20 cover? Cruise ship.
They also say the masks have graphene oxide weaved inside. They specify which ones and state the mask basically works as an antenna. Please do your own research on all of this.
In that post none of the hantavirus primers or probes got an exact match to a human genome, but he only got exact matches for things like a 19-base subsegment of a 23-base primer. Similarly close matches are likely to occur by chance, as is shown by the high E-values. None of the E-values in his screenshots reached below the significance threshold of 0.05, apart from a single set of matches that had an E-value barely below 0.05.
Even though PCR tolerates some degree of mismatches, it's not clear if any of his matches were even close enough to result in a false positive match. And in order for the primer-and-probe set to return a positive match to a human genome, the two primers have to match nearby regions of the human genome, and the match to the probe has to be located between the matches to the primers.
Virology is simply propaganda for the Pandemic Industrial Complex. It bears zero resemblance to any science.
Thank youJames
Dualism’s 400-year reign ends violently because the organism will not be erased forever.
Once that cut is made, you are helpless, reality is permanently split into two hostile camps:
https://vegetativetraining.wordpress.com/the-religion-of-the-tyrant-wearing-the-mask-of-reason-of-faith-of-progress/
Brett Weinstein did a did a really good podcast that sheds light on the hanta scare:
https://rumble.com/v79mdui-the-325th-evolutionary-lens-with-bret-weinstein-and-heather-heying.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp_a
Hanta normally spreads from airborne dried mouse-rat droppings and urine particles inhalation by humans; not via human to human.
There are some signs the WHO is trying to promote the idea this occurrence could be human to human.... It's more likely that keeping people confined to cabins ventilated with possibly contaminated air instead going on deck to get fresh air, increased the risk of further infections.
This is consistent with the type of bad advice, essentially contrary to common sense and science, that was being put out during the cv19 operation.
Hanta virus is also RNA (like cv19), and of a type that could be fought with Ivermectin, but, of course, AI queries say it won't work for Hanta, just as AI said for cv19.
Great story… except there’s one tiny plot hole: you can’t actually prove any of it.
Really?
Weinstein is considered a very competent source by many.
GoogleGemini has this to say:
------- How is hantavirus spread as an infection in humans?
" Hantavirus is not spread the way many common viruses are—you can’t catch it from another person coughing or sneezing on you. Instead, it is a zoonotic virus, meaning it jumps from animals to humans. Specifically, it is carried by certain species of rodents.
Here is exactly how the virus spreads from rodents to humans:
1. Airborne Inhalation (The Most Common Way)
The primary way people get infected is by breathing in microscopic particles of the virus.
The Source: The virus is shed in the urine, droppings, and saliva of infected rodents (such as deer mice, white-footed mice, cotton rats, or rice rats).
The Trigger: When fresh rodent urine, droppings, or nesting materials are disturbed—often by sweeping, dusting, or moving things in closed spaces—tiny viral particles become airborne.
The Infection: You breathe in these contaminated particles, and the virus enters your lungs. This process is known as airborne transmission via aerosolized dust.
2. Direct Contact
You can also contract the virus by physically touching contaminated materials and then transferring the virus to your own body.
If you touch rodent urine, droppings, or nesting material and then immediately touch your mouth, nose, or eyes, the virus can enter through your mucous membranes.
3. Rodent Bites
While much less common, if an infected rodent bites you and breaks the skin, the virus can be transmitted directly through its infected saliva.
4. Ingestion
On rare occasions, eating food or drinking water that has been contaminated by the waste of an infected rodent can lead to infection.
Where Do Exposures Usually Happen?
Most people contract hantavirus in rural or semi-rural areas where rodents find shelter. Common exposure sites include:
Opening or cleaning closed-up cabins, sheds, barns, or outbuildings.
Cleaning areas that have been vacant for a while (like a garage or attic).
Working in crawl spaces, under houses, or in fields.
Hiking or camping in areas where rodents live.
⚠️ Important Note on Human-to-Human Spread: In North America, the types of hantavirus that cause Hantavirus Pulmonary Syndrome (HPS) are strictly non-contagious between humans. You cannot catch it from holding hands, kissing, or breathing the same air as an infected patient. (Note: A rare strain called Andes virus in South America has shown limited person-to-person spread, but this is the
exception, not the rule). "
------ Is hantavirus RNA type?
"Yes, hantavirus is an RNA virus.
Specifically, it belongs to the Bunyaviridae family (or more recently, the Hantaviridae family) and consists of enveloped, single-stranded, negative-sense RNA.
How its RNA structure works:
Segmented Genome: Its RNA is split into three distinct segments, usually referred to as:
L (Large): Encodes the viral RNA polymerase, which allows the virus to replicate.
M (Medium): Encodes the surface glycoproteins (G
n
and G
c
), which help the virus attach to and invade host cells.
S (Small): Encodes the nucleocapsid protein, which protects the viral RNA.
Negative-Sense ($[-]$RNA): This means the viral RNA cannot be directly translated into proteins by the host cell's machinery. Instead, the virus must first use its own polymerase to transcribe the negative-sense RNA into a positive-sense mRNA strand before it can replicate and hijack the host cell.
Because it is an RNA virus, it replicates within the cytoplasm of the host's cells rather than entering the cell nucleus."
Is there any proof that viruses actually exist?
" Yes, there is overwhelming, undeniable scientific proof that viruses exist. Because viruses are incredibly tiny—vastly smaller than bacteria—we couldn't actually see them for a long time, which led to early skepticism.
However, over the last century, advances in technology have allowed us to isolate, image, genetically sequence, and even manipulate them.
Here is the definitive proof of their existence, broken down by how we know they are real:
1. We Can See Them (Electron Microscopy)
You cannot see a virus with a standard school microscope because viruses are smaller than the wavelength of visible light. However, in the 1930s, the invention of the Electron Microscope changed everything. Instead of light, it uses a beam of electrons to image objects at the nanometer scale.
In 1939, scientists captured the very first images of a virus (the Tobacco Mosaic Virus). Today, we have high-resolution, 3D images of thousands of different viruses, showing their distinct shapes, from the soccer-ball-like structure of adenoviruses to the lunar-lander shape of bacteriophages (viruses that infect bacteria).
2. We Can Sequence Their Genetic Material (DNA/RNA)
Just like humans, animals, and bacteria, viruses have their own unique genetic blueprints. We can extract this genetic material, map it, and read it using genomic sequencing.
When a new illness appears (like SARS-CoV-2 in late 2019), scientists can isolate the virus from a patient and map its entire RNA sequence within days.
This genetic proof is what allows us to create highly specific diagnostic tests (like PCR tests). A PCR test doesn't look for symptoms; it looks for the exact, unique chemical sequence of the virus's RNA. If the virus didn't exist, these tests would not work with such pinpoint accuracy.
3. We Can Isolate and Grow Them (Koch’s Postulates)
In virology, scientists use a modified version of "Koch’s Postulates" to prove a specific germ causes a specific disease. We can:
Take a sample from a sick host and isolate the specific viral particles.
Grow that virus in a laboratory setting (using cell cultures, since viruses need living cells to replicate).
Introduce that isolated virus to a healthy organism, which then develops the exact same disease.
Re-isolate the identical virus from the newly infected host.
This rigorous process proves not only that the virus exists, but that it is the direct cause of the illness.
4. We Can Watch Them Replicate and Crystallize
In 1935, scientist Wendell Stanley successfully crystallized the Tobacco Mosaic Virus, proving it was a distinct, tangible chemical structure made of protein and RNA.
Furthermore, using modern time-lapse cryo-electron microscopy, scientists can literally watch the life cycle of a virus in real-time: attaching to a host cell, injecting its genetic material, hijacking the cell's machinery to mass-produce copies of itself, and bursting out of the cell to infect others. "
Lmao 🤣😂 For any of what you’ve said to hold water, you’d first need to prove the virus actually exists. You can’t — and neither can Whinestein.
But don’t worry, the entire field of viroLIEgy has the same problem, so at least you’re in “good” company.
Sure. Here's what you do: the most direct of the claims of the proof of existence of viruses is the claim that they can be seen with electron microscopes. Go after that and prove they are mistaken or lying. If you're right, it should be simple.
Lmfao 😂😆🤣 Those EM pics you hold in such high regard are produced after researchers subject monkey kidney cells to a chemical torture chamber — antibiotics, reagents, starvation media, toxic additives, and other stressors specifically designed to induce cytopathic effects.
Then the sample gets put through an even harsher preparation process for electron microscopy: chemical fixation, dehydration, heavy-metal staining, resin embedding, ultrathin sectioning, vacuum exposure, and bombardment with an electron beam — all procedures openly acknowledged to create distortions and artefacts.
After all that abuse, a white coat slaps an arrow on a blurry blob with little spikes and triumphantly declares: “Behold — a novel coronavirus!” 😂
The awkward problem is that researchers have demonstrated the same images can be produced in control cultures without adding any patient snot, saliva, or alleged viral isolate at all. In other words, the process itself is capable of generating the very cytopathic effects and particle imagery later claimed as “proof” of a virus.
That’s not rigorous science — that’s interpretation layered on top of assumption.
Before the cv19 mass murder operation put on by the medical-pharma establishment, and Western govts., I would have assumed you were at least exaggerating. And, of course, if the existence of something dangerous can be sold, so can the necessity for funding its research, prevention measures, etc.
The recent Dr Ardis show on Lupus cure highlights the very nasty "side effects" HCQ gives as one of the 3 main drug treatments for Lupus, so beware of using it very long. Lupus is a parasite, so maybe the other natural treatments like fenbendazole would work also?
MARTIN ZIZI HANTAVIRUS VIDEO TRANSLATED TO ENGLISH Hélène Banoun AND JESSICA ROSE
https://x.com/MartinZ_uncut/status/2055731386603159690
The Hanta Hoax
https://academic.oup.com/jid/article/229/1/30/7209758
EVERYONE IS WATCHING THE HANTAVIRUS SCARE BUT MISSED THE REAL SCANDAL
They just blew their own cover 💥
They just proved they knew all about the *vaccine* dangers before COVID‼️
The U.S. Army/NIAID biodefense world had already tested a genetic-instruction hantavirus vaccine in humans.
Enrollment: Feb. 19, 2019 – Nov. 4, 2019
Developed by USAMRIID / Fort Detrick.
Supported by NIAID / NIH + the Military Infectious Disease Program.
Manufactured/supported by Aldevron.
Delivered by PharmaJet needle-free injection.
This one did NOT even use lipid nanoparticles, which cause even more damage, to help it enter our cells.
And even without LNPs:
⚠️98% had local adverse events.
⚠️65% had systemic adverse events.
⚠️15% of vaccine recipients had related Grade 3 symptoms.
It is now crystal clear that long BEFORE COVID, federal biodefense actors already had human data showing genetic-instruction vaccine platforms were highly reactogenic and dangerous❗️
That matters legally
Under EUA law, recipients were REQUIRED to be informed of the significant known and POTENTIAL risks and “the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown.” 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii).
FDA labeling rules also require warnings when there is reasonable evidence of a clinically significant hazard causation does not have to be definitively proven first. 21 C.F.R. § 201.57(c)(6)(i).
**They have yet to update their labels for what we already know currently: Spikevax, RSV mNEXSPIKE…
And informed-consent regulations REQUIRE disclosure of reasonably FORESEEABLE RISKS or discomforts. 21 C.F.R. § 50.25.
So if federal actors already knew genetic vaccine platforms could produce widespread reactions, and they failed to disclose that platform history and unknowns before pushing COVID mRNA products, that is not just an oversight….not just an oopsie.
That is a direct informed-consent and EUA disclosure failure.
🔹They knew the platform family carried risks.
🔹They withheld the platform history.
🔹They sold it as routine.
The Empire Strikes Back--the recent firing of Marty Makary and Tracy Høeg. Doesn't Robert Kennedy Jr., as head of the HHS, which overseas the FDA, have any input or control over the corrupt house cleaning at the FDA?
FDA or Fraud of Drugs Administration.
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/pharmaceuticals-whats-in-them?utm_source=publication-search
"Hantavirus spreads primarily from infected rodents to humans, especially through exposure to aerosolized rodent urine, droppings, or saliva in enclosed spaces."
The elephant in the room: there's no direct isolation of any Hantavirus (or any other pathogenic microbe).
I love your work Steve, but please investigate virus isolation methods - once you see the fraud, you can't unsee it.
He knows viroLIEgy is a fraud which begs the question: why does he continue to peddle pseudoscience?
Hantarirus Deaths:
Hackman and Arakawa was discovered to have turned into a "breeding ground for infestation" earlier this week after numerous dead rodents, droppings, and nests were discovered all over the property.
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/us/gene-hackmans-home-labelled-a-rodent-haven-as-police-photos-expose-a-shocking-state-of-disrepair-and-hoarded-clutter-check-pics-here/articleshow/120348275.cms#google_vignette
https://www.tmz.com/2025/03/08/gene-hackman-wife-betsy-deteriorated-fast-hantavirus/
They did have a dog…which died from being caged indoors without food or water…and not from Hantavirus.
But NO RATS, rat dropping or any evidence of rats were found inside the house and direct living quarters. Rats were in “outbuildings,” a common circumstance.
The Hackmans should have had indoor and outdoor cats.
Viruses do not exist, only poisons.
The scientific consensus is that the news media are transmitting dangerous frequencies and people should instead listen to music tuned to 528 Hz. Concerts should be organized to bring these frequencies to a wider audience.
https://odysee.com/@tntradiolive:3/KATE-SHEMIRANI-HR2_23062024:e
https://odysee.com/@januszkowalskii1979:e/528-HZ-Healing-Frequency-(Leonard-Horowitz-2008):4
https://nolongerenslaved.com/blogs/no-longer-enslaved/444-hz-the-key-that-unlocks-revelation
https://github.com/kushview/retuner/releases/tag/1.1.0
HANTAVIRUS is a fake
Do not fall for it.
Viruses in the other hand have never been isolated. They simply don't exist according to Dr. Lee Merrit
https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/hantavirus-is-a-fake-dont-fall-for?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=870364&post_id=196740169&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=fo77t&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email
Quinta Columna from Spain has proposed that there is not a true Hanta pandemic; instead something more deadly. They are activating 26GHz by the 5G & 6G antennas. That has a devastating effect on the graphene oxide in your body and hence, a horrific effect on one’s body. Hard to evade the frequencies being emitted. The 26GHz is on cruise ships, planes and stadiums (note this is the year of the world cup games). Please consider. Quinta columna was part of the leading edge proving graphene oxide was in the jab. The antenas are weapons. If this perspective is true, this will be a horror show. Quinta columna says get out of the cities. We need the frequency weapons against mankind not to be used. As a side note, Economist 12/20 cover? Cruise ship.
They also say the masks have graphene oxide weaved inside. They specify which ones and state the mask basically works as an antenna. Please do your own research on all of this.
https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/hantavirus-pcr-test-sequences-repeatedly
Hantavirus PCR Test Sequences Repeatedly Match Human DNA: New BLAST Analysis Raises False Positive Concerns
Do hantavirus PCR tests mistake human DNA for a virus?
In that post none of the hantavirus primers or probes got an exact match to a human genome, but he only got exact matches for things like a 19-base subsegment of a 23-base primer. Similarly close matches are likely to occur by chance, as is shown by the high E-values. None of the E-values in his screenshots reached below the significance threshold of 0.05, apart from a single set of matches that had an E-value barely below 0.05.
Even though PCR tolerates some degree of mismatches, it's not clear if any of his matches were even close enough to result in a false positive match. And in order for the primer-and-probe set to return a positive match to a human genome, the two primers have to match nearby regions of the human genome, and the match to the probe has to be located between the matches to the primers.