Trump is a guy, so by definition he engages in truth, boast, lies. Find a man who hasn’t. Maybe you can point to a perfect non-sinner. If you can’t, then you’re talking a matter of degree—some sinners are better than others. Fine.

In this instance, the people have chosen Trump over your objections. Don’t like it? Find solace somewhere. Don’t want to participate? Find a hobby while the process ignores you.

Want to point out that he’s flawed, damaged, has an agenda, doesn’t intend to shape his sphere to your liking? Fine. Point it out. Congrats on making the world a better place.

From this side of the discussion, Trump is a lesser of evils, and should he have another chance, the expectation—and expectations can be dashed—is that he would remove some overtly bad actors, appoint marginally better actors, preside over a remake of the precinct level of elected offices nationwide, and otherwise steer a marginally better course so that the nation fails in a couple decades instead of within the next few years.

Call Trump, like an ugly life-extending treatment, a horrible experience but a marginal improvement over the certain alternative near term.

Expand full comment

... and then a systematic "adverse drug event" applied on mankind.

Autoimmune inflammatory reactions triggered by the COVID-19 genetic vaccines in terminally differentiated tissues



Published online: 14 Sep 2023



As a result of the spread of SARS-CoV-2, a global pandemic was declared. Indiscriminate COVID-19 vaccination has been extended to include age groups and naturally immune people with minimal danger of suffering serious complications due to COVID-19. Solid immuno-histopathological evidence demonstrates that the COVID-19 genetic vaccines can display a wide distribution within the body, affecting tissues that are terminally differentiated and far away from the injection site. These include the heart and brain, which may incur in situ production of spike protein eliciting a strong autoimmunological inflammatory response. Due to the fact that every human cell which synthesises non-self antigens, inevitably becomes the target of the immune system, and since the human body is not a strictly compartmentalised system, accurate pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies are needed in order to determine precisely which tissues can be harmed. Therefore, our article aims to draw the attention of the scientific and regulatory communities to the critical need for biodistribution studies for the genetic vaccines against COVID-19, as well as for rational harm-benefit assessments by age group."


Mistakes were NOT made.

Expand full comment

And another truth:

Vitamin D deficiency was the KEY factor in severe COVID-19 & death. Vit.D was all that was needed (they all knew it). 4 early Vit.D studies were sabotaged (did Vitamin D get the Ivermectin treatment?)


DR. WILLIAM MAKIS MD - 10.09.2023

... related to:

RAPID REVIEW: COVID-19 and vitamin D



... an excerpt:

"Vitamin D status and COVID-19

Prepared under urgency – 2 June 2020


The human body mostly sources vitamin D through a reaction that requires UVB-light (sunshine). It can also be obtained from certain foods and oral supplements. Scientists have long studied the role of vitamin D in the body, and the implications of vitamin D deficiency.

Deficiency correlates with a wide range of diseases – including an increased prevalence and severity of viral respiratory infections.

Further, there is an observed overlap between several groups at-risk for severe COVID-19 disease and groups at-risk of vitamin D deficiency (although children are a prominent exception). There are also reports of correlation between disease seasonality, sun exposure and case mortality of COVID-19. ..."


They knew.

Expand full comment

Another myth busted:


How a highly effective vaccine turns into a mediocre vaccine — or worse


Jul. 5, 2023


The study from 2006:

Evidence of bias in estimates of influenza vaccine effectiveness in seniors


International Journal of Epidemiology, Volume 35, Issue 2, April 2006, Pages 337–344



... and the paper in regards to effectiveness heavy biased as Prof. Eyal Shahar shows.

BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 (Comirnaty) Vaccine Effectiveness in Elderly Patients Who Live in Long-Term Care Facilities: A Nationwide Cohort


Gerontology. 2022;68(12):1350-1357. Epub 2022 Feb 8.



In add. I would like to introduce this paper - please check the issue date:


Increases in COVID-19 are unrelated to levels of vaccination across 68 countries and 2947 counties in the United States


European Journal of Epidemiology volume 36, pages1237–1240 (2021)



... and remind us:




In short: the jabs simply don't work in respiratory infections - and never had. (!)

Expand full comment

Good on you Steve. Just dont leave them alone, We need a groundswell to get them in public and accountable. Thanks for your efforts.

Expand full comment

Thanks a million for the well stated reply, Brandy! A pleasure to read and very interesting. I have to admit, your theory is just as likely as mine based on the information I have. I'll give it some more thought.

Try not to gag, but (in my mind), on the one hand, Trump is the country loving hero, single-handedly battling the.evil deep state Uniparty (however incompetently). And, on the other hand, he's the pompous, vain, low-class egomaniac with less maturity, DC experience, and good judgement than your average 12 year-old. Still, given the choice of Biden or Trump for prez, I would definitely have to go with Trump who I consider the lesser of the 2 evils. At least Trump won't make it his mission to destroy the country like Brandon does! Right now, I would take RFK Jr. over either in a second. So far, my only criticisms of him are his apparent acceptance of the man made climate change story (even though he says he won't wreck the economy over it) and his classic Democrat belief that you can give people free stuff and expect them to be productive. These are minor compared to his countless great qualities though. I sure hope he's really as good as he seems to be. Nighty, night.

Expand full comment

I think we have to be careful we don't go running around claiming we can assign even halfway accurate numbers to anything based on this nursing home data even if it is "record level." Your excellent recent analysis where you found the 28% increase in IFR among the boosted in the JAMA paper was important I'd say not because it's an accurate number but because it shows the data is garbage and JAMA is not to be trusted. While that particular data shows an increased IFR, other nursing home data from the same source shows a reduced IFR. Therefore, all we can say is the data is junk. It's dependent on some sketchy determination of who is counted as "Covid positive" based on some sketchy PCR test and who falls within the sketchy time frame of what's considered "vaxxed" or "boosted." My guess is it's way more than a 28% increase in IFR, but who knows? Your finding of the red flags where, miraculously, death and infection rates dropped immediately after the boosting despite what we all know is another reason to distrust the data. Again, great work, but we don't want to lose sight of what it really means.

Expand full comment

This confirms virtually every other study that it has been much more lethal to have been vaccinated than to have just 'risked' getting Covid.

Expand full comment

An Op-ed has been posted at Trial Site News (https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/are-we-paying-for-the-sins-of-our-ancestors-transgenerational-epigenetic-inheritance-11ca9929) titled "Are we paying for the Sins of our Ancestors: Transgenerational Epigenetic Inheritance?". It examines how toxic actions and toxic exposures from previous generations can impact today's and succeeding generations. Because of the times required to conduct these multigenerational studies, they tend to be performed on rodents, insects, fish, etc. In some sense, the extrapolation of these experimental results to humans can be viewed as proxy clinical trials.

Expand full comment

With all the death of the elderly nation wide i think we can come to the conclusion that this was one of the many plans this communist democrat administration had planned all along!

Expand full comment

This kind of increase in all cause mortality can be seen in most (maybe all?) vaccines. That’s why they don’t look for it. That’s why they keep the double blind placebo trials short and use a fake placebo. That’s why they don’t study overall health outcomes. That’s why they don’t compare vaccinated children to unvaccinated children and follow them into adulthood. That’s why they make so many “adjustments” to trial groups. That’s why they don’t allow access to raw data of trials when having studies peer reviewed.

It’s just sad what “the science” has become. There’s no grants or funding from pharmaceutical companies for people who actually want to know the truth. The truth does not make money for oligarchs or allow people/organizations to wield power. I don’t expect this will likely ever change. Take control of your health. It’s the only way out of this madness.

Expand full comment

Indeed, the psychopaths in control duped Many into accepting a bioweapon thrust into Our flesh. We might want to solve for psychopaths in control.

Why Does Money Promote Psychopaths? (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/why-does-money-promote-psychopaths

Expand full comment

Steve thanks again, in the steps you want to share and educate epidemiologist. I think you well have good success unless they get there bread buttered by the covididens.Good luck we admire you!

Expand full comment

Hey Steve, are you listening to the AICP (FDA) meeting going on now?

Expand full comment

Thanks Steve! I’ve argued with so many that the 💉is not good for elderly! Now I have something to show it.

Expand full comment