Thank you for all you do, Steve!

Expand full comment

These three have been doing the same for at least 20 years. Dorit occasionally branches out into attacking midwifery and homebirth, as well. Actual science mrans nothing to them.

Expand full comment

Anyone has researched the Shingrix vax -recombinant zoster- trial? Thanks!

Expand full comment

I have a long history of tangling with the "Skeptical Raptor" idiot going back at least 15 years, which is why I can no longer post comments on his website:

"We are unable to post your comment because you have been banned by Skeptical Raptor Blog."

These cowards thrive within their own deluded bubble of self-aggrandizing puppets, but when they cannot handle folks from the outside who know enough to poke holes in their stupid arguments, like cockroaches they scurry from the light.

Expand full comment

I had a recent dust up on Twitter with a Pharma Flack regarding Turtles all the way down. This book definitely concerns the Pharma Flacks and they really don't know how to attack it head on for the reasons you state. Everything in the book is documented and a matter of public record.

In my case the Pharma Flack just kept on saying the book was not credible because the authors are anonymous. Then he played dumb and pretended not to know that the medical industry will punish any doctor or health professional that is vocal about dangers of vaccines going so far as having their license removed and fired from their profession.

Turtles is marvelous book that should be essential reading for anyone that wants to know what really happens behind the scenes in the drug industry.

Expand full comment

Absolutely reckless behavior - Really grateful to both Zander and Steve for continuing to follow through with these exposés.

Expand full comment

I forgot to mention that Reiss's "review" proudly declares that one of the HPV vaccine trials actually DID use an inert saline placebo ... as if this were the black swan that proves all vaccine critics wrong about lack of a true control group in clinical trials. In fact, I believe that at least one of the covid vaccine trials included a saline placebo arm after ICAN and others hounded them. But my point here is that the HPV vaccine trial was a textbook example of how Pharma finds innumerable tricks to avoid exposing the most harmful differences between the vaccine group and the placebo control group results. As I recall, for the mild and moderate adverse events reports, the HPV vaccine study reported all three groups (the new HPV vaccine, a licensed vaccine, and the saline placebo). But for the severe adverse events, the study reported a single combined "placebo groups" result (the licensed vaccine "placebo" and the saline placebo). This completely obscured any useful information about how harmful BOTH vaccines were over "doing nothing" (the saline placebo). And, as we know, the covid vaccine studies weeded out those pesky saline placebo control groups by declaring that the vaccines were so effective and essential after testing them for five minutes that it would be unethical not to unblind the studies and let the placebo group get the vaccines ... thus forever destroying the control group and our ability to know how well the vaccines work compared to no vaccine at all.

Expand full comment

After having read Turtles I did my own little check-up with the MMR vaccines. Quite astounding how public some things are if you just look them up. It seems to me they don`t need to hide much any more, as they get their licences no matter how high the SAEs (serious adverse events) are.

Some data from clinical trials (SAEs found at the end of the pages):

1) Safety and Immunogenicity Study of GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) Biologicals' Measles, Mumps and Rubella (MMR) Vaccine (209762) Compared to Merck & Co., Inc.'s MMR Vaccine in Healthy Children 12 to 15 Months of Age


2) Consistency Study of GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) Biologicals' MMR Vaccine (209762) (Priorix) Comparing Immunogenicity and Safety to Merck & Co., Inc.'s MMR Vaccine (M-M-R II), in Children 12 to 15 Months of Age


3) Immunogenicity and Safety Study of GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) Biologicals' Combined Measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) Vaccine in Children in Their Second Year of Life


To me these studies seem to be highly comparable.

So - first two studies (once injected in the study period) - SAEs round about at 2 %.

Third study (twice injected in the study period) - SAEs round about 6 %.

Hospitalization rates rise from 10 % (once injected) to 23 % (twice injected).

The second injection took place at day 42 of the study, thus prolonging the observation period from 180 to 222 days, a bit more than 20 % increase in the time period.

I assume this could be a kind of proof that the vaccine is the causable agent of a good share of the SAEs. Otherwise the rate of the SAEs should only have risen far less. Or am I wrong?

If someone wants to have fun with this data, make a comparison of the rates of SAEs shown in the clinical trials and the numbers given e.g. here for the package leaflet (see pages 7 and 8, and have a special look at the text concerning arthritis):


Even after having read Turtles the bluntness made me speechless.

Expand full comment

I got a copy just a few weeks back based on your suggestion. I need to block time out to read it now. It is so fascinating that we're discovering a century of criminality here in real time. Boy did the whole "COVID" p(l)andemic backfire.

How many more years of lifespan will we add if we avoid the child-destructive shots for our families? I suspect this whole "pandemic" will end up changing highly profitable "sickcare" into actual healthcare, especially when this all becomes public knowledge.

And that's why I ordered some merch. I want to show off my soon-to-be-collectors items! Last year I walked around airports with "The Real Anthony Fauci" (an awesome read), and this year, I'll be wearing a "Misinformation Superspreader" T-shirt while carrying a copy of "Turtles All The Way Down."

Expand full comment

Superb. Thank you and God Bless.

Expand full comment

WEF schill

Expand full comment
May 19·edited May 19

The Democrat party is a religious organization now. It’s devoted members frequently use the word “believe“ when you argue with them. They live on beliefs not fax.

Expand full comment

What kind of a name is "Dorit"? Sounds strange like she has a massive inferiority complex.

Pharma to these creeps: Hey, parasites, we need some tech savvy people to be pimps and assassins for our products and to attack ethical and honorable people for lots of money. Interested? Job pays up into the six figures!

Expand full comment
May 18·edited May 18

It's great to see that Steve has figured out that ALL vaccines are a scam, not just the covid shots.

Welcome to the pro-science, aka anti-vaxx, team.

Expand full comment

I will order the Turtles book. I have not had any vaccine in 30 years and see no reason to get one ever again. I did not recommend them to my patients and eventually this ended my medical career. I doubt Dorit even read the Turtles book. If you investigate her career and who funds her it's pretty obvious, she has always been a paid shill of the vaccine companies. She is so devoid of morality that if her children died of covid shots she would blame covid. There are thousands of people like Dorit, in law, in medicine, in the media. They all have an agenda and are compensated to promote vaccines. I think most people would abandon any moral principles they have if offered enough money. It's a basic flaw of humanity.

Expand full comment