340 Comments

That's right. I see that about 60% percent reduced use rate let's say; the rest is : it depends what type of a human you meet.

Expand full comment

When you see police direct dogs to attack peaceful protesters, it's safe to assume that none of this is about health or safety.

Expand full comment

I have been to Santa Clara several times this year they are crazy nutty there. Barista almost attacked me for throwing a mask back at him! 😎 I just said go back and make some coffee, mamas boy. I do have to say I was provocative some, so it is partly my fault. Nevertheless in Santa Clara it is stupid insane people.

For a

comparison in Tracy California I can walk into any store without a mask and nobody says a peep. Yet BAC employees are off the rails, but WellsFargo employees are pacific.

Expand full comment

I haven't worn a mask anywhere for well over a year in both Nevada and Placer Counties. There are some who do wear masks, but I'd say most do not. And the attitude is more or less "do what you want."

Expand full comment

Alex Berenson wrote about a national study published in JAMA that showed the rate of hospitalizations for the unvaxxed is only a few percentage points beyond the vaxxed, not like 10 times worse, as frequently said:

https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/vaccines-dont-stop-covid-hospitalizations

Robert Clark

Expand full comment

I feel the unvaccinated are making themselves sick by mental agitation, fear, panic attacks etc. I can induce a sick state within myself for example if I begin to be afraid and I jump into the what if loop. If your mind perceives imminent danger it will react accordingly, the obverse is of course true as well.

Expand full comment
Jan 9, 2022·edited Jan 9, 2022

the UNvaccinated? did you mean the Vaccinated? Oh, maybe I see what you meant. Still - I find the unvaccinated to be less prone to the fear etc - otherwise they'd be in the vax group.

Expand full comment

Your right, Steve…….not going to happen! They CDC lie like a rug!

Expand full comment
Jan 8, 2022·edited Jan 9, 2022

I have a solid proof that C-19 "vaccines" (gene therapies) work as specified.

Facts are facts:

1. Navigate to https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus

2. Select Israel on the left panel and un-check all other countries

You'll see 4 huge infections peaks since march 2020.

The 1st peak occurred on Sep 2020 when there were no "vaccines" available.

The 2nd peak on Jan 17th 2021 - vaccination campaigns started on December 2, 2020.

This peak was higher than the previous one when there were no vaccines!

The 3rd peak on Sep 14, 2021 and was higher than the previous one.

This coincided with their 3rd shots (booster) - weird isn't it!

The 4rd peak is still flying higher and higher, may be well formed in the next 2 weeks and is already higher than the previous peak. This coincides with their 4th shot (2nd booster!!)

Isn't that a solid proof that "vaccines" are stopping infections and transmissions in a country that is almost fully vaccinated since August 2021? At this speed, Israel will achieve C-19 herd immunity in 75 years!

Expand full comment

They would work if used correctly, but they are for the moment in the wrong hands for the wrong reasons.

Expand full comment

Another solid proof to support my argument that C-19 "vaccines" are absolutely working as expected:

The 9 SCOTUS justices who are all triple vaxxed had to wear a face mask and tested negative before attending the hearing of the OSHA C-19 vaxx mandate cases yesterday and their arguments showed that they were very knowledgeable about the "pandemic":

http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2022/january/08/aiding-bidens-attack-on-american-rights-supreme-court-justices-peddle-endless-streams-of-covid-misinformation/

Expand full comment

Do you have a PDF of this Memo. That would be nice to have.

Expand full comment

Santa Clara County Health Officer Dr. Sara Cody is a complete bozo and is deliberately compromising patient safety because she can’t interpret the science correctly.

None of what is happening with hospitals or schools has to do with science. It never has and revealed on the Highwire program last Thursday even had my jaw dropping. https://thehighwire.com/watch/

start video at 2:02:20 & listen to a public health analyst.

Expand full comment

I wonder what would happen if the public went to knock on the office

door of Sara Cody, like a group or 10-30, and copy this visitation style across the USA to every county HO ( "Health Officer")?

Expand full comment

I'd like to be in that group.

Expand full comment

I think we need to do something like it. I already hung up notices at Sheriffs and emailed Santa Clara Sheriffs. Start with a group of one and add in as you go some 🤠

Expand full comment

Djokovic Reveals He Was Given Exemption To Enter Australia Because Of Recent Covid Infection

On Jan. 1, it said, he received a document from Home Affairs telling him his responses indicated that he met "the requirements for a quarantine-free arrival into Australia".

By revealing his recently infected status, Djokovic is effectively pushing the debate of natural immunity, which has been extensively maligned by the authorities, vs vaccinations (and their numerous adverse side-effects) to the forefront.

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/djokovic-reveals-he-was-given-exemption-enter-australia-because-recent-covid-infection

Cases in Australia are up an astounding 426,644% since the Washington Post said they’d “almost eliminated” COVID by following science

Even with masks, vaccine passports and forced isolation, they just reported the equivalent of ~950,000 US cases

Nailed it again, The Science™

Expand full comment

Had to take a Surgeon to tell the truth. As a FACS myself, I respect Mark Adams, MD, FACS for his courage!

Expand full comment

Steve . I need to get a message to you. Bruce West of Health Alert, the longest running alternative newsletter in the country (40 years) in Carmel dies suddenly and was the last person I would have thought that could happen to at age 73. Can you have a team member investigate cause of death. I suspect hospital.

Expand full comment

When I hear "public health", I look for the agenda and motives of the purveyor, and that agenda is usually not to optimize my individual health.

Expand full comment

The words "public health" usually signals one is dealing with "elite" type thinking. Let me use animal-like racism to illustrate the conceptual "packaging."

"Elites" package people in their minds into status groups. When an "elite" speaks of "public health," the public is conceptually packaged into a lower status group. We could put honest words in their mouths and say "public health" is "the health of the sheep-people class."

Narcissistic "elites" constantly think in terms of status, and feel entitled to push others around. They do not think in terms of individual equality, and do not have respect for those "beneath" them, which they push around and manipulate (lie to) like sheep.

Expand full comment

Like the new favorite of the Davos crowd; “human infrastructure“. If leaders of the Confederacy had the same mastery of linguistics that the modern Left has, we might still be a slave nation.

Expand full comment

Excellent analogy. "Slave owner" mindset. We would still be a slave nation.

The "underclasses' " professional opinions from doctors, who truly know the science, don't count because they aren't owners, who decided they "represent" 🤣 the public.

Expand full comment

Fallacies: Cherry picking and Simpson's Paradox. Suppose there are 100 people in your hospital, of which 90 are old. Suppose old people are 95% vaccinated. but 65% of the old people in hospital are vaccinated. That means any individual in the 5% unvaccinated is 7 times more likely to be in hospital than anybody in the 95% vaccinated: 35% of the beds occupied by 5% of the population. Among the younger hospitalized, let's say that 100% are unvaccinated. Total vaxxed in hospital: 58%.

Expand full comment

"UKHSA released England's Covid data for the last 4 weeks of 2021. In every age group 18 and above, the infection rates for the vaccinated are higher than the unvaccinated. Overall, you are about 2¼ times more likely to get Covid if you are vaccinated."

Also, there's the problem of the vaxxed dead and the vaxxed injured - the vaxxed who have a milder case of Omicron. And early treatment works. Too bad our PHAs didn't figure this out in March 2020, which would have been easy.

Get boosted! Mild myocarditis is no big deal and not indicative that the vaccines could be causing other problems.

Expand full comment

This is also Simpson's paradox, and also not pertinent to Steve's claim about hospitalization based on one cherry picked example.

Expand full comment
Jan 8, 2022·edited Jan 8, 2022

"Mild myocarditis" is a big deal and long term studies performed before 2019 all show major long term issues with children that suffered from "Mild myocarditis".

My son has a heart issue and we discussed this with his cardiologist at Childrens hospital. I doubt any child cardiologist would agree that just because it does not kill the child immediately that "myocarditis" is safe for a child long term. We have to weigh the risks vs reward and children dying from THE COVID is pretty low at this point and no worth this risk at this point.

Here is just one study:

"The survival rate was 86 % (95 % confidence interval (CI), 65-96) at 30 years."

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23064719/

Expand full comment

Did you inadvertenly reply to the wrong comment? Neither Steve's post nor my comment mention myocarditis.

Expand full comment

My good friend is an ER Doctor that was let go for refusing the shots. We admire him and those like him greatly. I'm coming up on the same decision point depending on the SCOTUS ruling for the FJB OSHA mandate. Sounds like this hospital system at least has someone awake at the switch trying to provide some intelligent leadership. Good luck. Pray. Plan. Prepare. Resist.

Expand full comment

In a free society, people would be able to speak out and make choices without fear of suppression, losing their jobs or social status. Right now, we are not free. It’s an illusion of freedom.

Expand full comment

Believe it or not, employers want to protect the health of ALL their employees. They have that right. And the vaccinations protect against SERIOUS disease and death.

Expand full comment

Let me know when they take the vending machines full of soda, chips and candy out of the break room snd mandate that each employees BMI is on target to maintain employment. They must also be tracked to ensure they are exercising.

There is ZERO data much less proof that these vaccines prevent serious disease and death. But there is proof these shots cause myocarditis and blood clots even in small children. Wake the hell up.

Expand full comment

No, Claude, employers don’t have the right to protect the workers health as they see fit. They can’t tell the chubby girl that she can’t have McDonalds for lunch. They can’t tell the workers that they can’t smoke pot at the end of their shift. They can’t tell a women that she has to take birthcontrol (or not). I remember the days when employers could ask a woman what their family plans were……………all that training and then she gets preggers. OSHA gets to „protect“ workers safely only when they are on the job and only from job related hazards.

Expand full comment

Boy do I remember one of your points. The time was 1974, I was in college but was interviewing for a summer job with the State of California. Of course I didn't admit I was only going to work in the summer, but I well remember that one interview question was whether or not I planned to get pregnant!

Expand full comment

Love this

Expand full comment
Jan 8, 2022·edited Jan 8, 2022

And employers will have a flurry of EEOC cases to deal with because they ignore religious exemptions (Title VII, Civil Rights Act). So that makes these emplowers lawless which casts immediate doubt on their concern for your health.

Expand full comment

Not actually true, Claudia. There is perhaps a 7 week window where due to an antibody boost, recipients may be better off than the unvaxxed. However, the Pharma trials started counting 5 weeks post first injection because there was a 40% increase in infections due to the immune challenge of the vaccine. Then the efficacy significantly waned at four months and pretty much disappeared the benefit by 6 months with higher 'all cause' mortality that included 5xs the number of deaths by heart attack, which is why Pharma quickly ended the trials at 6 months, and after about five minutes of recommending boosters at 6 months, the powers-that-be are now recommending boosters at 5 months.

However, the bottom line is that there are more reports of significant harm (not sore arms) that would result in missed work in VAERS (over 1 million) than there are Covid deaths. That data includes over 20k reports of DEATHS from the VACCINE. There is no real world benefit from the current vaccines and there is significant risk. Period.

Expand full comment

Several studies have concluded that VAERS is seriously underreported. This one ( https://digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/publication/r18hs017045-lazarus-final-report-2011.pdf ) concludes less that 1% of actual incidents are reported, for instance.

Expand full comment
Jan 9, 2022·edited Jan 9, 2022

I just watched Dr. McCullough in an interview in which he discussed at length the VAERS system and that 20k figure. Apparently a number of people have been looking at the numbers reported and he said it's now suspected that the 20k is highly underreported and the vaccine death number is more than likely about 187,000.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Interesting point. There is also the Hawthorne Effect where test subjects will do other things in order to maximize the result the testers want from them. I doubt either has too big an impact when dealing with a viral infection, at least not for the hospitalization and death piece of it, but there is evidence that there was bias in determining what was mild v. moderate illness and preventing moderate, as well as serious, illness was a goal. I believe prevention of deaths was an assumption stemming from preventing serious illness, but the 'all cause' mortality at six months would have been devastating and prevented FDA authorization IF that data had been properly reported.

Expand full comment

yeah no

Expand full comment

There is actually no real proof of this. This is another declaration put out by CDC, that gets repeated over and over again by talking heads in media. Eventually the masses begin to believe that it’s true. Where are the data that PROVE this- there are none.

There are millions of people like myself who recovered from Covid, with nothing more than flu like symptoms - so not severe symptoms. The CDC refuses to adequately study this population, so how could they say with confidence that severity of disease is reduced by vax? They can’t know the level of severity a person who received vax vs the severity of disease in an unvaccinated, because symptoms vary wildly from person to person.

Expand full comment

Stepping back even further, how do we know it was Covid? The PCR can't tell the difference between Covid and seasonal flu.

Expand full comment

Well - in my case, I tested positive for Covid antibodies for more than 6 months after my infection. Tests performed by Red Cross through regular blood donations. Red Cross stopped performing tests (probably) because they were pressured by CDC/NIH. It was an easy way for individuals with natural immunity to “prove” we still had antibodies. CDC needs people to be in the dark so they can perpetuate their lie that vaccine is superior to natural immunity.

Expand full comment

Steve... Thanks for your efforts. Sadly, I am seeing more and more trolls. I expect that the number of these will track the rise of "unexplained" deaths very accurately.

Expand full comment

The more they fear Steve's influence at getting at the truth the more trolls you will see. Their increased presence says a lot and it's not all bad.

Expand full comment