Eight questions "Professor Dave" is afraid to answer

I'd love to get answers, but when I posted these questions to his video, he deleted them within 10 minutes after I posted them. Is that how science works?

Pierre Kory and I recently debated “Professor Dave” (who isn’t a professor) and “Debunk the Funk” in a wide ranging vaccine debate.

It’s hard to say if it changed anyone’s minds because there were too many topics across too short a time window. Fewer topics, with 3 papers on each side, would have been far better. Ejection for ad hominem attacks is needed. Lesson learned!

Since the debate, “Professor Dave” has subsequently produced defamatory videos claiming victory.

Here are some questions that went unanswered. I tried to post these questions on Professor Dave’s video that personally attacked me, but within 10 minutes he removed my comments.

1. Why was it necessary for you to remove my comments I just posted on your video about me? Don’t you believe in free speech

   

2. Is it appropriate in a scientific debate to make ad hominem attacks both during and after the debate? Why was it necessary for you to do that? Isn’t it better to stick to the science? Apparently, this is a standard tactic that you employ with others as well. Why?

3. If the COVID vaccines saved lives, why can’t you produce a single credible study that properly analyzed official government record level data showing that? Tjere doesn’t appear to be one as the Obel Danish registry paper pointed out.

4. If the COVID vaccines are so safe and didn’t kill anyone, why has the CDC refused to publish the autopsy results for ANYONE who died after their COVID shot? They have the histology. Why not make it public and show everyone that the CDC was right? And why do all the post-jab autopsy studies show a consistent pattern of vaccine harm?

5. Can you give us a link to the most recent scientific paper you authored? What is your h-index? Your Google Scholar link? I’d love to read your scientific papers but searching for “David James Farina” gave no matching links. Here’s my Google Scholar link with my h-index (8) for comparison purposes.

6. Here’s my latest paper. It teaches a new method for how we can properly analyze retrospective observational mortality data in vaccine studies. What do you think? I’d love to get your insights on the approach. What changes do you think I should make? When the method is applied to the publicly available Czech data, it shows the COVID vaccines caused massive harm. If it wasn’t the vaccine increasing the deaths after being dosed, what did? I did the identifiability tests and the deaths were associated with the dose, not calendar time. It wasn’t HVE because the Dose 2 group was flat relative to Dose 0, but the Dose 3 (booster) group rose for 15 weeks. How do you explain this?

7. In 2017, the CDC did a study comparing mortality of vaccinated vs. under vaccinated kids. No significant mortality difference. If vaccines have saved massive numbers lives, why was there no signal? Where is the CDC study of record level data in the US showing that vaccines save lives?

8. If vaccines don’t cause autism as your claim, how do you explain the McDowell triplets? The only time in human history where 3 kids got autism within hours of each other and it happened hours after getting their vaccines. Was this just the greatest scientific coincidence in history or did the vaccines cause the autism? The timeline described was unmistakably acute:

   • Morning — visit to the doctor’s office for vaccines.

   • Afternoon — fevers, crying, loss of eye contact, and regression behaviors.

   • Days later — all three triplets exhibiting NEW and IDENTICAL symptoms consistent with regressive autism.

I invite Professor Dave to answer in the comments. I look forward to being educated.

Bonus questions (for extra credit)

1. A recent French study published in JAMA showed COVID shots reduce your ACM by 25%. How many COVID shots have YOU personally taken? As many as you can get?

2. Why do you use the name “Professor Dave?” You are not a professor. Isn’t that misrepresentation?

3. If COVID vaccines don’t cause turbo cancer, how do you explain the results in this paper? The rates of these cancers have never been seen before and they are suddenly happening worldwide and they didn’t start happening until after the COVID shots rolled out. What’s the cause?

   

   
   

4. Do you think this is the proper way to question a scientific paper by personal attacks against the author? Do you condone this approach or condemn it? Have you spoken out about it like I have? Or have you made posts in the opposite direction encouraging ad hominem attacks instead of questioning methods or data?

   

   

5. Is it OK if a COVID vaccine integrates into your DNA? Here’s the paper.