In his latest video, Dr. Campbell looks through the Pfizer documents and concludes, "This has just destroyed trust in authority." Yup John. You're right. It was obvious to some of us 10 months ago.
In defence of Dr Campbell, I always thought that he was being very careful to avoid tripping You Tube sensors. I assumed that he had made a decision that getting some information out on this platform is better than none.
Like so many of your readers, I followed Dr Campbell during the Plague years and appreciated his positive information on things like dosage for Vitamin supplements, including different versions of dosage used around world.
I knew from the start that CV19 was a hoax and could not understand why so few people saw what was obvious to me.
When I saw Dr Campbells redpill video I was pleased he had the courage to 'come out' publicly. I felt that was his best contribution yet to the wellbeing of the populations.
Prove him wrong then. Seems like you're just pissed he isn't going along with the Pfizer Flock, as more and more people realize that there's a lot more to the story than what the media and politicians are preaching. The ones that are wholly committed to the vax are the ones who've been duped, not Dr. Campbell. Think for yourself.
I believe that John Campbell has his heart in the right place,, but like so many people he finds it difficult to believe that there is widespread corruption and fraud in our health organisations, government, and news media. It took me a while to realise this (can you believe I used to be an admirer of Bill Gates, until my wife red-pilled me) so I did tons of research, and now I understand the WEF, the WHO, and UN and the the whole sorry state of this world.
As Greg Busch noted below, he may be playing a clever game, but I rather think it takes time for the incredulousness of the whole situation to sink in, and this is a good first step.
My husband keeps trying to get people to understand almost everything runs on Amazon or MS products. If they pull the plug, we will all be in the dark. I believe this is why Epochtimes sends a newspaper. Someone with $$$$ needs to get this project for our own internet? going before there is no substack either. Not a techy myself but visit boblphd@substack.com.
Yes, along those lines you can join GAB's parallel community. Andrew Torba, CEO, is implementing your idea. However, we need more. E Musk is working in the same direction.
I don't believe Dr. John was red-pilled at this moment. I have been watching him for well over a year. He is a man of integrity and self-awareness which led him to use his background in science and medicine to dig into and teach on a wide range of C-19 topics. My personal belief is that he was aware of inconsistencies and even mis-information coming from regulatory agencies quite a while ago. He used his keen judgement to wink & nod at these things as they came up in his brilliant analyses. You had to listen to his videos, watch his expressions, his pen marks, and his tone - he was not fooled.
Then he waited for the drug makers data. He waited for the key moment, like a wise strategist, when he could show his revulsion about what had been done to humanity based on their own data. AND he was still on YouTube with an ever increasing audience in which to do it.
I can also attest to the belief that it wasn't just one document, it was a process. He flamed BBC earlier, and his wording indicated that he was getting a bit closer to judging data for himself, and trusted less at face value.
But still he was fooled for a long time. And he is very careful and does not like to stick his head out and call fraud when he sees it.
He also missed the require safety rules of doctors. Healthy people below 65 was never in a great danger, and caution dictates not to put a hurriedly tested substance into your body where no one knows the long term consequences assuming its a newly created treatment. Its even more obvious when you can treat with Vitamin D3, Mega C, Zinc, etc and greatly increase your chances and prepare your immune system. And then wait till the later in the fall, and by then we all new about ivermectin and fluvaxamine thx to Steve Kirsch and other great fighters.
Campbell actually talked about the benefits of Vitamin D3 as tested by spanish hospitals in 2020.
What takes time for us, and what is needed it so learn and understand that evil is among us. We have to understand that evil is here. Otherwise we think others are nice people like we are, and would never deliberately kill or hurt others or hide evidence.
Its good to see though that we now have a 2-front war, Russia/China/Iran/(maybe India) on the military front, and beautiful 'anti-vaxxers' on the non-military front. Putin wages the war against the Empire of Lies and strikes a tough blow militarily against the believe that USA military is everything. This has caused the USA to ruin their USD reserve currency by using the swift system against Russia, which is great, because it furthers the collapse. When the USA is no longer in charge of the world militarily the DeepState collapses sooner or later. It took some years for rome, but it is happening.
Btw. if you think Putin is evil wrt. Ukraine you need a heavy dose of red-pilling. Read https://thesaker.is/ and voxday.net. Read The Sakers initial posts at the start of the invasion regarding why Putin is doing it. Also read his post from yesterday about 3-missiles. The western media is lying perhaps even worse than in the covid-case, which is saying something.
No one should be "mystified" by arbitrary censors since neither they nor their procedures are open to scrutiny. For censors, arbitrary behavior is normal and cannot be refuted by facts.
cause (someone) to have their perspective dramatically transformed, especially by introducing them to a new and typically disturbing understanding of the true nature of a particular situation.
"they are talking about conspiracy theories and claim they have been red-pilled"
Origin
1990s: with reference to a scene in the 1999 film The Matrix, in which the protagonist is offered the choice between taking a blue pill that will restore his ordinary experience of reality and a red pill that will reveal its true nature.
I’m getting so much in my in box I can’t keep it straight. QUESTION for ANYONE:
New govt sponsored (Yes that alone is a red flag) test-to-treat pharmacy program with pavloxid and molnupiravir as the treatment.
Has Steve or Malone or Kory or anyone blogged on this yet? Not that this particular stupidity is new. I already know a bit about molnupiravir (and what I know is a mixed bag of moderate good mixed with very bad and high price monetarily), but know next to nothing about pavloxid although I did look it up. Similar although I think it’s cheaper but still far more than ivermectin.
Yes there is data something my husband said they get $3000 per dose. He also had some stats on deaths. I’m not sure he verified this I will have him post something.
Hi Steve. Just posted the below on the Principia Scientifica website that carried this article.
There are three sources of data on adverse events.
1. The Pfizer clinical trials.
2, The 3 month post-authorization Pfizer marketing report from 10 December 2020 to end February 2021
which can be used to test the URF on:
3. Adverse events reporting systems - subsequent medical studies
Quick note: Only around half of the vaccines administered in the US were Pfizer - Moderna was administered that is, Pfizer 38.4 million doses, Moderna 36.7 million out of 75.1 million in total.
Scoot to page 11 titled "Increased Risk of Illness" and you will see that there were more than 5,200 adverse events in the injected group of around 22,000 compared to 1,300 in the placebo group of the same size. Plus 20 injected group all mortality deaths v 14 placebo deaths.
The FDA was presented with data showing that 24% of those injected with Pfizer/BioNTech would suffer (compared to 6% in the placebo).
24% of Pfizer injections in the post-authorization marketing report of 38 million Pfizer injections (out of a total of 75 million injections including Moderna) implies that Pfizers contribution to adverse events was expected to around 10 million adverse events.
Incidentally, why is there ZERO COVERAGE OF MODERNA POST MARKETING DATA??? DOES IT EXIST?
We cannot assume that Pfizer injections are the sole contributor to adverse events.
Ball-parking VAERS reporting in the THREE MONTH post- authorization period as half US/half non-US, we can say that Pfizer injections were expected to cause 5 million adverse events per 38 million Pfizer doses, just in the US in a three month period.
Call it 130,000 adverse events per million Pfizer doses. This is after three months - does this mean that it would be correct to assume 520,000 adverse events on an annualized basis?
There have now been 330 million Pfizer doses administered in the US in a little over a year.
Assuming all adverse events are encountered within 3 months of injection, (VAERS reports suggest 80-90% occur with the 14 days that the FDA says don't qualify as "vaccine injuries") and no annualization of 3 month data we get expected adverse events predicted/estimated from the clinical trial data of around 43 million.
VAERS has around 1.2 million of which around half are for the US, so around 600,000 reports.
The URF using this method (scaling clinical trial data = around 72 times. of course, it could be that clinical trial data OVERESTIMATED adverse events by this same factor.
The clinical trial data showed 20 all cause mortality deaths in the injected group v 14 in the placebo group during the trial which was unblinded after just a few months. Both groups were healthier than the general population - not the population most at risk.
Moving on, the 3 month post-authorization report to February 2021 has a few major issues. Firstly, around one third of adverse events are not followed up and secondly, 2/3 of adverse events occurred within women.
We have had numerous studies globally over the last year for specific condition. These need to be reconciled to both the clinical trial and the post-authorization marketing report.
Lastly, do not forget that the 79 pages of "adverse events of special interest" are not necessarily caused by injections. These are the adverse events that medics globally said should be "looked for" and reported on,
Anyone notice Moderna stock spiking while other things are falling. Haven’t checked Pfizer though. Not that it matters I think they are evil but interesting nonetheless that you are questioning Modernas health impact. The actual vac is basically the same as Pfizer, right? But the dose was different I heard. ? Not sure if the additives or LNPs are the same ? Again, anyone know?
In defence of Dr Campbell, I always thought that he was being very careful to avoid tripping You Tube sensors. I assumed that he had made a decision that getting some information out on this platform is better than none.
Like so many of your readers, I followed Dr Campbell during the Plague years and appreciated his positive information on things like dosage for Vitamin supplements, including different versions of dosage used around world.
I knew from the start that CV19 was a hoax and could not understand why so few people saw what was obvious to me.
When I saw Dr Campbells redpill video I was pleased he had the courage to 'come out' publicly. I felt that was his best contribution yet to the wellbeing of the populations.
Prove him wrong then. Seems like you're just pissed he isn't going along with the Pfizer Flock, as more and more people realize that there's a lot more to the story than what the media and politicians are preaching. The ones that are wholly committed to the vax are the ones who've been duped, not Dr. Campbell. Think for yourself.
I believe that John Campbell has his heart in the right place,, but like so many people he finds it difficult to believe that there is widespread corruption and fraud in our health organisations, government, and news media. It took me a while to realise this (can you believe I used to be an admirer of Bill Gates, until my wife red-pilled me) so I did tons of research, and now I understand the WEF, the WHO, and UN and the the whole sorry state of this world.
As Greg Busch noted below, he may be playing a clever game, but I rather think it takes time for the incredulousness of the whole situation to sink in, and this is a good first step.
Sadly, his last video within a minute stated that the vaccine and the mandates have reduced mortality. He just is a lost soul.
My husband keeps trying to get people to understand almost everything runs on Amazon or MS products. If they pull the plug, we will all be in the dark. I believe this is why Epochtimes sends a newspaper. Someone with $$$$ needs to get this project for our own internet? going before there is no substack either. Not a techy myself but visit boblphd@substack.com.
Yes, along those lines you can join GAB's parallel community. Andrew Torba, CEO, is implementing your idea. However, we need more. E Musk is working in the same direction.
"Talk to the morticians" https://www.trunews.com/stream/todd-callender-genetic-altering-vaccines-could-nullify-human-rights
I believe this video has been removed from YouTube
Trishpott@gmail.com
I don't believe Dr. John was red-pilled at this moment. I have been watching him for well over a year. He is a man of integrity and self-awareness which led him to use his background in science and medicine to dig into and teach on a wide range of C-19 topics. My personal belief is that he was aware of inconsistencies and even mis-information coming from regulatory agencies quite a while ago. He used his keen judgement to wink & nod at these things as they came up in his brilliant analyses. You had to listen to his videos, watch his expressions, his pen marks, and his tone - he was not fooled.
Then he waited for the drug makers data. He waited for the key moment, like a wise strategist, when he could show his revulsion about what had been done to humanity based on their own data. AND he was still on YouTube with an ever increasing audience in which to do it.
Marvelous John! Brilliant.
I wish you had been my teacher long ago.
I can also attest to the belief that it wasn't just one document, it was a process. He flamed BBC earlier, and his wording indicated that he was getting a bit closer to judging data for himself, and trusted less at face value.
But still he was fooled for a long time. And he is very careful and does not like to stick his head out and call fraud when he sees it.
He also missed the require safety rules of doctors. Healthy people below 65 was never in a great danger, and caution dictates not to put a hurriedly tested substance into your body where no one knows the long term consequences assuming its a newly created treatment. Its even more obvious when you can treat with Vitamin D3, Mega C, Zinc, etc and greatly increase your chances and prepare your immune system. And then wait till the later in the fall, and by then we all new about ivermectin and fluvaxamine thx to Steve Kirsch and other great fighters.
Campbell actually talked about the benefits of Vitamin D3 as tested by spanish hospitals in 2020.
What takes time for us, and what is needed it so learn and understand that evil is among us. We have to understand that evil is here. Otherwise we think others are nice people like we are, and would never deliberately kill or hurt others or hide evidence.
Its good to see though that we now have a 2-front war, Russia/China/Iran/(maybe India) on the military front, and beautiful 'anti-vaxxers' on the non-military front. Putin wages the war against the Empire of Lies and strikes a tough blow militarily against the believe that USA military is everything. This has caused the USA to ruin their USD reserve currency by using the swift system against Russia, which is great, because it furthers the collapse. When the USA is no longer in charge of the world militarily the DeepState collapses sooner or later. It took some years for rome, but it is happening.
Btw. if you think Putin is evil wrt. Ukraine you need a heavy dose of red-pilling. Read https://thesaker.is/ and voxday.net. Read The Sakers initial posts at the start of the invasion regarding why Putin is doing it. Also read his post from yesterday about 3-missiles. The western media is lying perhaps even worse than in the covid-case, which is saying something.
No one should be "mystified" by arbitrary censors since neither they nor their procedures are open to scrutiny. For censors, arbitrary behavior is normal and cannot be refuted by facts.
What does "red pilled" mean?
https://youtu.be/zE7PKRjrid4
red-pilled
cause (someone) to have their perspective dramatically transformed, especially by introducing them to a new and typically disturbing understanding of the true nature of a particular situation.
"they are talking about conspiracy theories and claim they have been red-pilled"
Origin
1990s: with reference to a scene in the 1999 film The Matrix, in which the protagonist is offered the choice between taking a blue pill that will restore his ordinary experience of reality and a red pill that will reveal its true nature.
I’m getting so much in my in box I can’t keep it straight. QUESTION for ANYONE:
New govt sponsored (Yes that alone is a red flag) test-to-treat pharmacy program with pavloxid and molnupiravir as the treatment.
Has Steve or Malone or Kory or anyone blogged on this yet? Not that this particular stupidity is new. I already know a bit about molnupiravir (and what I know is a mixed bag of moderate good mixed with very bad and high price monetarily), but know next to nothing about pavloxid although I did look it up. Similar although I think it’s cheaper but still far more than ivermectin.
Anyone want to comment?
Yes there is data something my husband said they get $3000 per dose. He also had some stats on deaths. I’m not sure he verified this I will have him post something.
Excellent article!
Just a little note to all the docs
coming to Jesus on the deadly realities of the vax;
Any investor who has ever owned a biotech stock
knows that you cannot produce a safe medication
for humans with less than a year's clinical trials.
WTF were ya'll thinking..........................................
We are of one mind on this
Hi Steve. Just posted the below on the Principia Scientifica website that carried this article.
There are three sources of data on adverse events.
1. The Pfizer clinical trials.
2, The 3 month post-authorization Pfizer marketing report from 10 December 2020 to end February 2021
which can be used to test the URF on:
3. Adverse events reporting systems - subsequent medical studies
Quick note: Only around half of the vaccines administered in the US were Pfizer - Moderna was administered that is, Pfizer 38.4 million doses, Moderna 36.7 million out of 75.1 million in total.
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/covid-vaccine-doses-by-manufacturer?country=~USA
Ok, 500 Canadian medics pulled apart the CLINICAL trial data submitted by Pfizer here:
https://www.docdroid.net/qQyBoKQ/the-covid-19-inoculations-more-harm-than-good-final-video-print-moreharm-pdf
Scoot to page 11 titled "Increased Risk of Illness" and you will see that there were more than 5,200 adverse events in the injected group of around 22,000 compared to 1,300 in the placebo group of the same size. Plus 20 injected group all mortality deaths v 14 placebo deaths.
The FDA was presented with data showing that 24% of those injected with Pfizer/BioNTech would suffer (compared to 6% in the placebo).
24% of Pfizer injections in the post-authorization marketing report of 38 million Pfizer injections (out of a total of 75 million injections including Moderna) implies that Pfizers contribution to adverse events was expected to around 10 million adverse events.
Incidentally, why is there ZERO COVERAGE OF MODERNA POST MARKETING DATA??? DOES IT EXIST?
We cannot assume that Pfizer injections are the sole contributor to adverse events.
Ball-parking VAERS reporting in the THREE MONTH post- authorization period as half US/half non-US, we can say that Pfizer injections were expected to cause 5 million adverse events per 38 million Pfizer doses, just in the US in a three month period.
Call it 130,000 adverse events per million Pfizer doses. This is after three months - does this mean that it would be correct to assume 520,000 adverse events on an annualized basis?
There have now been 330 million Pfizer doses administered in the US in a little over a year.
Assuming all adverse events are encountered within 3 months of injection, (VAERS reports suggest 80-90% occur with the 14 days that the FDA says don't qualify as "vaccine injuries") and no annualization of 3 month data we get expected adverse events predicted/estimated from the clinical trial data of around 43 million.
VAERS has around 1.2 million of which around half are for the US, so around 600,000 reports.
The URF using this method (scaling clinical trial data = around 72 times. of course, it could be that clinical trial data OVERESTIMATED adverse events by this same factor.
The clinical trial data showed 20 all cause mortality deaths in the injected group v 14 in the placebo group during the trial which was unblinded after just a few months. Both groups were healthier than the general population - not the population most at risk.
Moving on, the 3 month post-authorization report to February 2021 has a few major issues. Firstly, around one third of adverse events are not followed up and secondly, 2/3 of adverse events occurred within women.
We have had numerous studies globally over the last year for specific condition. These need to be reconciled to both the clinical trial and the post-authorization marketing report.
Lastly, do not forget that the 79 pages of "adverse events of special interest" are not necessarily caused by injections. These are the adverse events that medics globally said should be "looked for" and reported on,
Anyone notice Moderna stock spiking while other things are falling. Haven’t checked Pfizer though. Not that it matters I think they are evil but interesting nonetheless that you are questioning Modernas health impact. The actual vac is basically the same as Pfizer, right? But the dose was different I heard. ? Not sure if the additives or LNPs are the same ? Again, anyone know?
https://www.modernatx.com/covid19vaccine-eua/providers/clinical-trial-data-primary-series