Dr. Flavio Cadegiani just published a paper showing how Pfizer corrupts clinical trials
Dr. Cadegiani just published his research paper (moments after this interview) showing deliberate scientific sabotage by Pfizer. If there is another explanation, he's all ears.
Dr. Cadegiani just published a new research paper (“Pfizergate 2.0 - Active actions against competitive anti- COVID drugs? The case of the anti-androgens.”) that shows that there is no rational explanation for the corruption of clinical trial results other than deliberate sabotage by Pfizer to ensure that there are no viable competitors to Pfizer's products.
I interviewed him just minutes before he published the paper:
In the video, he talks about Proxalutimide, an anti-androgen drug he tested that is effective against variants prior to Omicron. But his main issue is in the trials of enzalutamide (another anti-androgen) and how it was conducted.
At the very end, Dr. Cadegiani reveals an astonishing statistic on the number of vaccine injured: 85%.
For best results, check out the paper briefly before you watch the video.
Figure 1 says it all:
Pfizer is adept at playing games and avoiding liability.
Watch this video on Pfizer shell companies from CNN 15 years ago. Of course, today, CNN would never run a video like that since they don’t want to lose ad revenue.
A little off-topic but I just wrote to an online independent news site in my state that was looking for tips that they should file a Freedom of Information act on all communication and papers filed with the word "Ivermectin" on the State Medical Board. They should also ask what doctors and nurses they have specifically investigated for prescribing or recommending Ivermectin.
28 States have passed or are about to pass laws forbidding State Medical Boards to hinder Ivermectin or off-label drug prescriptions. I recommended they ask if our state medical board would comply with such a law.
Finally, I recommended they should ask if the State Medical Board is willing to debate Steve Kirsch and his team of experts on vaccine safety and Ivermectin safety (since I know they're looking for takers!)
The online news site wrote me back that they were interested and would follow up!
This is an old game.
I had a small business startup in which I sought to manufacture an old anti-cancer vaccine in the public domain, Coley's toxins. It's a fever vaccine. Spontaneous regression of cancer is well-documented in the medical literature, back to the 1700s, to be associated with feverish infection.
The vaccine actually underwent a small phase I clinical trial at Sloan Kettering in 2012. But during the trial, patients were allowed to dose with anti-pyretics, diminishing the healing capacity of the fever. The trial still showed beneficial results, but far fewer than if this intervention had not been allowed.
I also wrote this piece on Vitamin C as a cancer treatment, in which I showed that flawed clinical trials at the Mayo Clinic, after Linus Pauling's seminal trials on Vitamin C, were used to discredit its use in cancer therapy. As a result, there were decades of setback and Linus Pauling, a Nobel Prize Winner in Chemistry, was branded as a quack.
Sound familiar? Welcome to the club, Steve. :) We do need more in the club!
https://themariachiyears.substack.com/p/modern-ignorance-and-ancient-wisdom-8c1?s=w