Do you know what "safe and effective" means according to the CDC? I'm going to tell you.
Do you know what "safe and effective" means according to the CDC? I'm going to tell you.
Safe means tested in 50 people and nobody died and only 8% needed professional medical attention. Effective means there is NO evidence whatsoever of a clinical benefit. Got it?
Executive summary
The CDC now recommends updated Covid-19 vaccines for everyone 6 months and older. Here’s the CNN story on the CDC approval.
What is the evidence for safety and effectiveness?
It was tested on 50 people and only 8% needed to see a doctor after the shot. And none of the 50 people died!
There was no evidence whatsoever it had a clinically meaningful benefit for anyone.
It wasn’t tested on anyone under 12, but was being recommended for 6 months and older. Only one CDC panel member had a problem with this. The rest of the ACIP committee members (outside committee of the CDC) didn’t seem to mind recommending it for people it was never tested on.
We now have clear evidence that the FDA simply ignores evidence which doesn’t support the narrative
Watch this video. Basically, in a meeting with top FDA officials including Peter Marks that was secretly (but not illegally) recorded, the FDA experts admit that if the data doesn’t support their narrative (even if it is from a gold standard randomized controlled trial), they ignore it (listen starting at around the 4:00 minute mark).
And a huge failure of the VAERS system (a 7 year old dies shortly after the vax from cardiac arrest and there is no follow up) doesn’t shock the FDA officials. They said to send them an email about it.
Watch the video and read the entire thread
Summary
If you think that the CDC and FDA exist to protect you from unsafe medical products, you are very badly mistaken. The two examples provided in this very short article should make this very clear to anyone.
You might get a laugh out of this:
https://newworldhumor.substack.com/p/cdc-dating-guidelines
I was an RN and one of many dirty little secrets of conventional medicine is that they focus on recent events to explain patients' presenting symptoms. Karen Kingston recently revealed there's an unprecedented 13 different versions of the clot shots. Previously SOP was no matter what company or country produced an Xmg dosage of a medication it was the same from one to the next. That is why researchers that have been obtaining samples of the clot shots to analyze are finding different toxins in the vials. This tells me they were designed to cause an array of adverse effects, many of them that'd only appear years in the future, making for confusion and plausible deniability. That keeps the shots a moving target so both the varied conditions as a result of them and the timing of when they present won't be attributed to the shots someone took in prior years. Eventually this will fail, but not until A LOT of people become disabled and die. You can see it's already happening if you follow Ed Dowd. I was working in life and disability insurance in 2020 when this all started, and saw that handwriting on the wall. Ed's analyses of the UK data (which we'll soon see in the US data) have only been proving me right. And I can assure you that industry already knows it, even if they're not admitting to it. My employer was at the time a division of a medical insurer, that mandated their employees get the shots in order to step foot in their offices but refused to cover medical claims for any damage caused by the shots, precisely because they were EUA. EVERY aspect of the medical-industrial complex was in on this evil scamdemic. IMHO the whole thing must be dismantled and replaced with REAL healing.