I would like to forward this to a relative who is expecting their first baby, but I think all of the unnecessary f-bombs and such would really drag down the perceived seriousness of the article.
I would like to forward this to a relative who is expecting their first baby, but I think all of the unnecessary f-bombs and such would really drag down the perceived seriousness of the article.
It's not new data. If you don't like the way that it's phrased with the f-bombs or whatever then you just don't like the presentation at all. This is data that's widely available. Is there something in particular you would like for your relative? You can Google the terms PubMed vaccines and autism and read plenty of peer reviewed studies right off the government's website. You could look at the insert for infantrix DTaP vaccine and see that according to them there's a likely causal relationship between that vaccine and SIDS. Here's a good article to read about SIDS and the myths "Vaccines and sudden infant death: An analysis of the VAERS database 1990–2019 and review of the medical literature"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214750021001268
Here's another good general article to read about vaccines that fully cites its sources in the end
What the “Casual Cruelty” of Dr. Paul Offit Reveals
Considered by many to be the world’s leading expert on “vaccine safety”
Here's the citation for the infantrix DTaP vaccine insert and also the citation for the law that requires there to be a likely causal relationship between the vaccine and the dangers listed within. Because people often argue that quote they have to say that. 🤔
**manufacturers insert for infantrix (DTaP) from the FDA at the end of page 12.**
"6.2 Postmarketing Experience
General Disorders and Administrative Site Conditions-
fatigue, injection site induration, injection site reaction, SUDDEN INFANT DEATH SYNDROME"
**FDA's requirements for including Adverse reactions as listed on the FDA website:**
“The ADVERSE REACTIONS section next should present those adverse reactions that occurred below the specified rate for inclusion in the common adverse reactions table or listing, but for which there is some basis to believe there is a CAUSAL RELATIONSHIP between the drug and the event (for purposes of this guidance, “less common” adverse reactions). …low-frequency adverse events generally will be listed when there is
reason to suspect that the drug may have caused the event. Typical reasons to suspect causality for an event include (1) timing of onset or termination with respect to drug use, (2) plausibility in light of the drug’s known pharmacology, (3) occurrence at a frequency above that expected in the treated population, and (4) occurrence of an event typical of drug-induced adverse reactions (e.g., liver
necrosis, agranulocytosis, Stevens-Johnson syndrome). For serious events that are typical of drug-induced adverse reactions, the occurrence of even a single event could be a basis for inclusion in the list. When none of these reasons exist, however, an event should be excluded from the list.”
I would like to forward this to a relative who is expecting their first baby, but I think all of the unnecessary f-bombs and such would really drag down the perceived seriousness of the article.
It's not new data. If you don't like the way that it's phrased with the f-bombs or whatever then you just don't like the presentation at all. This is data that's widely available. Is there something in particular you would like for your relative? You can Google the terms PubMed vaccines and autism and read plenty of peer reviewed studies right off the government's website. You could look at the insert for infantrix DTaP vaccine and see that according to them there's a likely causal relationship between that vaccine and SIDS. Here's a good article to read about SIDS and the myths "Vaccines and sudden infant death: An analysis of the VAERS database 1990–2019 and review of the medical literature"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214750021001268
Here's another good general article to read about vaccines that fully cites its sources in the end
What the “Casual Cruelty” of Dr. Paul Offit Reveals
Considered by many to be the world’s leading expert on “vaccine safety”
AARON SIRI
https://aaronsiri.substack.com/p/what-the-casual-cruelty-of-dr-paul
Here's the citation for the infantrix DTaP vaccine insert and also the citation for the law that requires there to be a likely causal relationship between the vaccine and the dangers listed within. Because people often argue that quote they have to say that. 🤔
**manufacturers insert for infantrix (DTaP) from the FDA at the end of page 12.**
"6.2 Postmarketing Experience
General Disorders and Administrative Site Conditions-
fatigue, injection site induration, injection site reaction, SUDDEN INFANT DEATH SYNDROME"
https://www.fda.gov/media/75157/download
**FDA's requirements for including Adverse reactions as listed on the FDA website:**
“The ADVERSE REACTIONS section next should present those adverse reactions that occurred below the specified rate for inclusion in the common adverse reactions table or listing, but for which there is some basis to believe there is a CAUSAL RELATIONSHIP between the drug and the event (for purposes of this guidance, “less common” adverse reactions). …low-frequency adverse events generally will be listed when there is
reason to suspect that the drug may have caused the event. Typical reasons to suspect causality for an event include (1) timing of onset or termination with respect to drug use, (2) plausibility in light of the drug’s known pharmacology, (3) occurrence at a frequency above that expected in the treated population, and (4) occurrence of an event typical of drug-induced adverse reactions (e.g., liver
necrosis, agranulocytosis, Stevens-Johnson syndrome). For serious events that are typical of drug-induced adverse reactions, the occurrence of even a single event could be a basis for inclusion in the list. When none of these reasons exist, however, an event should be excluded from the list.”
https://www.fda.gov/media/72139/download
Definitely…