I'm sorry to hear your husband is suffering. There is not any scientific proof of a contagious "it." Please read the CSTE position statement for starters and you will see how all the "cases" were created. Also look at the w.h.o. guidelines for ascribing "covid19" as underlying cod on death certificates. These 2 documents are important to understand, but the most important thing you can do is to read a scientific study and see in the methods section that there is clearly no possibility - zero - that a "virus" has been shown to be the cause of any illness. "Contagion" is when many people are sickened by the same toxic assault, like air pollution or radiation or mold or chemicals in drinking water, or wildfires burning around the globe in 2019. There is no scientific proof of virus existence, but the profits from the faith ("Trust the science") are real. I hope your husband will recover from whatever caused his illness. I recommend he eliminates, avoids and detoxes all toxicity as much as possible. Wishing you the best.
Thank you, kindly! I look forward to seeing you around various substacks, as well. I joined Twitter in the fall of 2022, I still don’t know how to use the features properly… I’ve always been social media adverse. Technology and I don’t get along (probably a good thing). I also find scrolling through social media so emotionally fatiguing. Being a rather private person, I don’t like sharing pics of my family, kids, etc. I also don’t like how social media makes people feel about themselves, everything is always out of context and I don’t like participating in anything that makes people feel like the grass is greener on the other side. All that being said, I joined Twitter in a personal crusade to spread awareness about possible adverse effects from the C19 injections and the destruction of the pandemic response. I’m very proud of the 39 followers I earned, lol! It’s all good, since I have a friend with over 5k followers and she retweets my stuff daily. I also feel I may have made some blue pilled people (well, they could have been bots) think twice about the vax. It’s a challenge to remain loving and respectful, but I’m up for it. Things are much better with Elon in control, but my gut tells me it might be a little too good to be true. I listen to James Corbett a lot and he interviewed Whitney Webb (or maybe it was the other way around) these are two of my favourite independent journalists, and they discussed Elon’s motives, making me realize they aren’t completely altruistic. They explained that in the future everything will be digital and the person with the power will be the one who controls the data. They discussed Elon’s plans around that… so I do use Twitter, but I take everything with a grain of salt. Weird thing is, I’ve been a practicing healthcare professional for 12 years and was never randomly selected for audit and this year my number came up. If I was a paranoid person I might say my social media posts may have something to do with it but I’ve always used discretion and professionalism, so I’m sure it will be fine… I’m actually looking forward to the audit process (I’m a nerd like that). Still, one can’t help but wonder…anyways, those are my thoughts for now. It’s so lovely to find a kindred spirit in this space, all the best to you, SEF!
I share the same sentiments about Dr. Prasad, he gives me a very untrustworthy vibe also. His propensity for crowd pleasing is unfortunately apparent. He’d probably justify his position by saying his interests are in being a middle man, or mediator between polar opposite sides… in the end, he will be accountable for his decisions and actions. The fact that he refused to sign the Great Barrington Declaration is very telling. It is a sad time we are living in when a doctor like him is better than most. I also don’t like talking negative about anyone but the stakes are very, very high here. Also, is it consider it “bad talking” when it is the truth? Thanks for clarifying that bit about “severe covid” as Pharma’s clinical endpoint. When a treatment kills it’s patients before the disease it was intended to prevent, I guess that’s one way to show how “effective” it is. What a joke. Deep down I was hoping Dr. Prasad knew something I didn’t re: genuine effectiveness of these genetic treatments. Thanks for validating my feeling that there is not one ounce of justification for these shots. What total BS! I’m so disappointed in our systems. It’s going to be hard to see the forest through the trees, since this is all complete and utter nonsense, but maybe there is a lesson for us all to learn… I’m sure there are many lessons for us and we can decide how to use this knowledge to protect ourselves, our families and our futures as best as possible. Thanks for your time, I enjoy reading your comments. Are you on Twitter?
You said it all really well, I couldn't agree more. Always nice to find someone who thinks similarly,
I really have to say "great minds think alike". I actually don't have a Twitter account but I do browse there from time to time, recently I've been thinking about creating an account now that Elon Musk has apparently made it a better place (at least somewhat). Maybe sometime soon. Anyway, I also enjoy reading your comments and corresponding with you, you really bring up lots of good points that make me think and remind me of things that I forget about. Hope to see you around here often and interact again. Be well and take care, Elizabeth!
Thank you so very kindly for putting this info together for me! It’s going straight into my personal C19 library of unbelievable tales… I just wish I knew what the heck Dr. Prasad is talking about…
From what you said below I think he is focusing on Pharma's endpoint of "severe COVID", which is still far removed from COVID death, let alone all-cause death. Bottom line is that the elderly in both the Moderna and Pfizer RCTs were more likely to die overall with the vaccine than placebo, which means any protection from COVID or "severe COVID" is moot. I don't want to take up too much space badmouthing, and to each their own, but I find Dr. Prasad to be highly untrustworthy. He's completely hostile towards alternative treatments like ivermectin (in spite of RCTs showing they save lives when used correctly), and he more or less worships mRNA vaccines while ironically being sour on Paxlovid (which is totally backwards since RCT data clearly shows Paxlovid saves lives while mRNA is more likely to kill than save). So obviously saving lives isn't his thing, he's too busy with other priorities like crowd-pleasing, being as cool and popular as possible on social media, and of course following the money. Very worrisome priorities for a "doctor", except he's likely still better than many other doctors.
The unvaccinated family member that died had COVID but died at Kaiser hospital after they gave him remdesivir and put him on a ventilator! They killed him, on purpose… I believe that’s called murder.
So I was just reading Dr. Vinay Prasad’s substack, Sensible Medicine and he says RCTs have been done… I wanted to comment to request a citation but it is for paid subscribers and I don’t like him that much to subscribe. Here is a direct quote from his substack
“One raging debate during the pandemic has been whether, and under what circumstances, the risks of mRNA vaccination exceed the risks of the virus. Of course, for an 80 year old who had not had COVID19 as of Jan 2021, the net benefit of vaccination was clear. RCTs had shown a reduction in severe disease, and this was definitely orders of magnitude bigger than any adverse events hitherto unknown. (It had to be due to basic math)“
mRNA vaccines DO NOT save lives in the elderly, according to the RCTs. That's actually not surprising, since the elderly are at extremely high risk of cardiovascular death (more than COVID).
In the Moderna RCT, the excess ALL-CAUSE deaths with the vaccine (compared to placebo) were actually in the >65 age group, believe it or not. Among age >65, there were a total of 9 deaths in the vaccine group versus 6 deaths in the placebo group. https://www.nejm.org/doi/suppl/10.1056/NEJMoa2113017/suppl_file/nejmoa2113017_appendix.pdf - see page 53, Table S19
The Pfizer RCT also had the same trend of excess ALL-CAUSE deaths with vaccine (versus placebo) being concentrated among age >60, but they made it much more complicated to understand: https://www.fda.gov/media/152256/download. Page 71 (Table 32)
And let's also look at VAERS, because most people here seem to love VAERS even though the RCTs give much more SOLID evidence that the vaccines kill more than they save. In VAERS, over 70% of unexpected deaths with known ages were in people aged >65, and about 90% were in people over age 50. https://openvaers.com/covid-data/mortality
Big Pharma's only COVID concoction that truly saves lives is Paxlovid (it actually prevented all 13 COVID deaths in its RCT https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2118542), but ivermectin is safer and also has RCT evidence of preventing most COVID deaths when used PROPERLY in people who actually NEED it.
So I was just reading Dr. Vinay Prasad’s substack, Sensible Medicine, and he says RCTs have been done… I wanted to comment to request a citation but it is for paid subscribers and I don’t like him that much to subscribe. Here is a direct quote from his substack
“One raging debate during the pandemic has been whether, and under what circumstances, the risks of mRNA vaccination exceed the risks of the virus. Of course, for an 80 year old who had not had COVID19 as of Jan 2021, the net benefit of vaccination was clear. RCTs had shown a reduction in severe disease, and this was definitely orders of magnitude bigger than any adverse events hitherto unknown. (It had to be due to basic math)“
My covid vaccine free partner died 4 weeks ago from cancer, but as he had a blood transfusion after an operation in March, I cannot confidently say he was "unvaccinated".
Hi Steve, two sources of pro-vaccine bias that you didn't mention:
1) According to two HCW I know in different states, vaccinated were more often given treatments that actually IMPROVE the survival odds, like monoclonal antibodies, melatonin, aspirin, famotidine, sometimes even vitamins and zinc, etc. Similar to what President Trump got in 2020 and was up and running in 3 days. Whereas the unvaccinated were typically deprived of those treatments at least until they're very ill, and they were just given remdesivir, antibiotics, etc., plus actively harmful things like proton pump inhibitors, excessive and unnecessary painkillers and sedatives, and of course premature use of ventilators, and finally their family members were hastily counseled into DNR orders and withdrawal of life support.
2) Vaccinated, on average, are obviously much more COVID-conscious than unvaccinated (trends in behavior mean that they are generally exposed to a lower viral load even if infected, and also less likely to be infected in the first place)
I'm sorry to hear your husband is suffering. There is not any scientific proof of a contagious "it." Please read the CSTE position statement for starters and you will see how all the "cases" were created. Also look at the w.h.o. guidelines for ascribing "covid19" as underlying cod on death certificates. These 2 documents are important to understand, but the most important thing you can do is to read a scientific study and see in the methods section that there is clearly no possibility - zero - that a "virus" has been shown to be the cause of any illness. "Contagion" is when many people are sickened by the same toxic assault, like air pollution or radiation or mold or chemicals in drinking water, or wildfires burning around the globe in 2019. There is no scientific proof of virus existence, but the profits from the faith ("Trust the science") are real. I hope your husband will recover from whatever caused his illness. I recommend he eliminates, avoids and detoxes all toxicity as much as possible. Wishing you the best.
We do need instruments to study nano magnetic fields. The human body‘s natural magnetic and electrical function is fouled up by lipid nanoparticles.
Thank you, kindly! I look forward to seeing you around various substacks, as well. I joined Twitter in the fall of 2022, I still don’t know how to use the features properly… I’ve always been social media adverse. Technology and I don’t get along (probably a good thing). I also find scrolling through social media so emotionally fatiguing. Being a rather private person, I don’t like sharing pics of my family, kids, etc. I also don’t like how social media makes people feel about themselves, everything is always out of context and I don’t like participating in anything that makes people feel like the grass is greener on the other side. All that being said, I joined Twitter in a personal crusade to spread awareness about possible adverse effects from the C19 injections and the destruction of the pandemic response. I’m very proud of the 39 followers I earned, lol! It’s all good, since I have a friend with over 5k followers and she retweets my stuff daily. I also feel I may have made some blue pilled people (well, they could have been bots) think twice about the vax. It’s a challenge to remain loving and respectful, but I’m up for it. Things are much better with Elon in control, but my gut tells me it might be a little too good to be true. I listen to James Corbett a lot and he interviewed Whitney Webb (or maybe it was the other way around) these are two of my favourite independent journalists, and they discussed Elon’s motives, making me realize they aren’t completely altruistic. They explained that in the future everything will be digital and the person with the power will be the one who controls the data. They discussed Elon’s plans around that… so I do use Twitter, but I take everything with a grain of salt. Weird thing is, I’ve been a practicing healthcare professional for 12 years and was never randomly selected for audit and this year my number came up. If I was a paranoid person I might say my social media posts may have something to do with it but I’ve always used discretion and professionalism, so I’m sure it will be fine… I’m actually looking forward to the audit process (I’m a nerd like that). Still, one can’t help but wonder…anyways, those are my thoughts for now. It’s so lovely to find a kindred spirit in this space, all the best to you, SEF!
I share the same sentiments about Dr. Prasad, he gives me a very untrustworthy vibe also. His propensity for crowd pleasing is unfortunately apparent. He’d probably justify his position by saying his interests are in being a middle man, or mediator between polar opposite sides… in the end, he will be accountable for his decisions and actions. The fact that he refused to sign the Great Barrington Declaration is very telling. It is a sad time we are living in when a doctor like him is better than most. I also don’t like talking negative about anyone but the stakes are very, very high here. Also, is it consider it “bad talking” when it is the truth? Thanks for clarifying that bit about “severe covid” as Pharma’s clinical endpoint. When a treatment kills it’s patients before the disease it was intended to prevent, I guess that’s one way to show how “effective” it is. What a joke. Deep down I was hoping Dr. Prasad knew something I didn’t re: genuine effectiveness of these genetic treatments. Thanks for validating my feeling that there is not one ounce of justification for these shots. What total BS! I’m so disappointed in our systems. It’s going to be hard to see the forest through the trees, since this is all complete and utter nonsense, but maybe there is a lesson for us all to learn… I’m sure there are many lessons for us and we can decide how to use this knowledge to protect ourselves, our families and our futures as best as possible. Thanks for your time, I enjoy reading your comments. Are you on Twitter?
You said it all really well, I couldn't agree more. Always nice to find someone who thinks similarly,
I really have to say "great minds think alike". I actually don't have a Twitter account but I do browse there from time to time, recently I've been thinking about creating an account now that Elon Musk has apparently made it a better place (at least somewhat). Maybe sometime soon. Anyway, I also enjoy reading your comments and corresponding with you, you really bring up lots of good points that make me think and remind me of things that I forget about. Hope to see you around here often and interact again. Be well and take care, Elizabeth!
Thank you so very kindly for putting this info together for me! It’s going straight into my personal C19 library of unbelievable tales… I just wish I knew what the heck Dr. Prasad is talking about…
From what you said below I think he is focusing on Pharma's endpoint of "severe COVID", which is still far removed from COVID death, let alone all-cause death. Bottom line is that the elderly in both the Moderna and Pfizer RCTs were more likely to die overall with the vaccine than placebo, which means any protection from COVID or "severe COVID" is moot. I don't want to take up too much space badmouthing, and to each their own, but I find Dr. Prasad to be highly untrustworthy. He's completely hostile towards alternative treatments like ivermectin (in spite of RCTs showing they save lives when used correctly), and he more or less worships mRNA vaccines while ironically being sour on Paxlovid (which is totally backwards since RCT data clearly shows Paxlovid saves lives while mRNA is more likely to kill than save). So obviously saving lives isn't his thing, he's too busy with other priorities like crowd-pleasing, being as cool and popular as possible on social media, and of course following the money. Very worrisome priorities for a "doctor", except he's likely still better than many other doctors.
The unvaccinated family member that died had COVID but died at Kaiser hospital after they gave him remdesivir and put him on a ventilator! They killed him, on purpose… I believe that’s called murder.
The vaccinated people I knew died from complications of the experimental toxic injection
the Sars-Cov-2 Vaccines reduce one's risk of dying of old age...period. !
("I think it's so groovy now that people are finally getting together...") ;)
🤣
Don't need a poll for this!
We know these "vaccines" are just big pharma money machine, nothing to do help health - a HOAX!!!
GOD bless you Steve for being a true TRUTH Warrior - GOD has got you in the Palm of His/Her Hand.
So I was just reading Dr. Vinay Prasad’s substack, Sensible Medicine and he says RCTs have been done… I wanted to comment to request a citation but it is for paid subscribers and I don’t like him that much to subscribe. Here is a direct quote from his substack
“One raging debate during the pandemic has been whether, and under what circumstances, the risks of mRNA vaccination exceed the risks of the virus. Of course, for an 80 year old who had not had COVID19 as of Jan 2021, the net benefit of vaccination was clear. RCTs had shown a reduction in severe disease, and this was definitely orders of magnitude bigger than any adverse events hitherto unknown. (It had to be due to basic math)“
Anyone know what Vinay is talking about???
mRNA vaccines DO NOT save lives in the elderly, according to the RCTs. That's actually not surprising, since the elderly are at extremely high risk of cardiovascular death (more than COVID).
In the Moderna RCT, the excess ALL-CAUSE deaths with the vaccine (compared to placebo) were actually in the >65 age group, believe it or not. Among age >65, there were a total of 9 deaths in the vaccine group versus 6 deaths in the placebo group. https://www.nejm.org/doi/suppl/10.1056/NEJMoa2113017/suppl_file/nejmoa2113017_appendix.pdf - see page 53, Table S19
The Pfizer RCT also had the same trend of excess ALL-CAUSE deaths with vaccine (versus placebo) being concentrated among age >60, but they made it much more complicated to understand: https://www.fda.gov/media/152256/download. Page 71 (Table 32)
And let's also look at VAERS, because most people here seem to love VAERS even though the RCTs give much more SOLID evidence that the vaccines kill more than they save. In VAERS, over 70% of unexpected deaths with known ages were in people aged >65, and about 90% were in people over age 50. https://openvaers.com/covid-data/mortality
Big Pharma's only COVID concoction that truly saves lives is Paxlovid (it actually prevented all 13 COVID deaths in its RCT https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2118542), but ivermectin is safer and also has RCT evidence of preventing most COVID deaths when used PROPERLY in people who actually NEED it.
So I was just reading Dr. Vinay Prasad’s substack, Sensible Medicine, and he says RCTs have been done… I wanted to comment to request a citation but it is for paid subscribers and I don’t like him that much to subscribe. Here is a direct quote from his substack
“One raging debate during the pandemic has been whether, and under what circumstances, the risks of mRNA vaccination exceed the risks of the virus. Of course, for an 80 year old who had not had COVID19 as of Jan 2021, the net benefit of vaccination was clear. RCTs had shown a reduction in severe disease, and this was definitely orders of magnitude bigger than any adverse events hitherto unknown. (It had to be due to basic math)“
My covid vaccine free partner died 4 weeks ago from cancer, but as he had a blood transfusion after an operation in March, I cannot confidently say he was "unvaccinated".
I'm sorry for your loss, Shirley.
Yup, same. Yet they still seem so confident they are right and we are wrong. Total twilight zone I swear!
https://twitter.com/Humble_Analysis/status/1608538097956052992?s=20&t=172b6GNp-NZMolWfnITOOQ
Data shows a pandemic now ONLY of the VACCINATED. The Unvaccinated are no longer dying from COVID. Only the vaccinated are dying from COVID.
This front page news is not on the front pages. Why? Let's ask Pfizer.
Hi Steve, two sources of pro-vaccine bias that you didn't mention:
1) According to two HCW I know in different states, vaccinated were more often given treatments that actually IMPROVE the survival odds, like monoclonal antibodies, melatonin, aspirin, famotidine, sometimes even vitamins and zinc, etc. Similar to what President Trump got in 2020 and was up and running in 3 days. Whereas the unvaccinated were typically deprived of those treatments at least until they're very ill, and they were just given remdesivir, antibiotics, etc., plus actively harmful things like proton pump inhibitors, excessive and unnecessary painkillers and sedatives, and of course premature use of ventilators, and finally their family members were hastily counseled into DNR orders and withdrawal of life support.
2) Vaccinated, on average, are obviously much more COVID-conscious than unvaccinated (trends in behavior mean that they are generally exposed to a lower viral load even if infected, and also less likely to be infected in the first place)