Jay Bhattacharya pulled the paper for quality reasons. Attacking him for his decision is unfair. There are 25 questions I'd like the authors to answer including why wasn't there a negative control.
I agree with your last sentence, that "We need more people like Jay in public service." Were Makary and Hoeg such people? It's a shame they're out. And I find it peculiar no one is talking about it.
WSJ 9 May 2026. Knives are out for Makary. Pharma complaining and anti abortion complaining, looks to me to be ochestrated as with Jay Bhatt sadly the political tide is turning. Trump no longer needs RFKjr votes.
I have a few questions for the study authors also:
Do they like old TV westerns like Have Gun Will Travel, Maverick and Want a Dead or Alive, not to mention dozens of others?
Do they go to the beach often and do they body surf?
Do any of them have a car that can do 0 to 60 in under four seconds?
Do they have pets and if so what kind of pets do they have?
Are any of them vegan, vegetarian, lacto-ovo vegetarian, or eat a mix of meat, fruit and vegetables, or are they mostly carnivorous?
When they put their shoes on, do they put one sock on and one shoe, then the other sock and the other shoe, or do they put both socks on and then their shoes?
There are many other questions that could be asked.
Many researchers have pointed out that Pfizer's clinical trial reports were riddled with various manipulations.
While the relative efficacy rate (RRR) of these manipulated reports (which better illustrated the effects of m1Ψ-mRNA) was 95%, the absolute efficacy rate (ARR) that was significant for individuals was only 0.716%.
(m1Ψ-mRNA refers to BNT162b2 and mRNA1273)
It is wrong for the CDC and FDA to advertise efficacy rates using RRR.
There is a definition formula in the fundamentals of medicine. RRR ≡ (Number of cases in placebo group - Number of cases in vaccinated group) / Number of cases in placebo group * 100 [%]
ARR ≡ [1 - {1 - Number of cases in placebo group / Total number of placebo participants} / {1 - Number of cases in vaccinated group / Total number of vaccinated participants}] * 100 [%]
At .0716% ARR (Absolute Risk Ratio) that equates by my calculation to a NNT (Number Needed to Treat = 1/ARR) of 140. Much prefer NNTs I can visualise the group of people. Of course the age group will matter significantly.
So we are injecting 140 healthy people with a novel vaccine that claims to prevent 1 person from getting covid - really!
"The Covid-19 Vaccines have failed to meet their advertised efficacy and have instead been associated with unprecedented levels of injury and death compared to any previous vaccines in history."
"No, we did not know whether the vaccine stopped transmission before we rolled it out. We had to really move at the speed of science to understand what is taking place in the market. And at that point of view, we had to do everything at risk."
~Janine Small, President of International Developed Markets for Pfizer, testified before the European Parliament (October 10, 2022)
"[The mRNA Covid Vaccine roll-out] is going to be bigger than the Holocaust. We've got to be somewhere between 10 and 20 million people that have been killed by these experimental vaccines worldwide, and it's still going up."
There is an extremely strong hint that the outcome was predetermined, and to make the outcome appear legitimate to the lay reader esecially, critical points were deliberately left alone. They know they did wrong from the get-go, so now they have committed themselves to lying to cover the lies already told. Premeditated manslaughter is murder.
CDC is corrupt, and accept that they did not hide it. They killed any questions. Forced jabb os jutt the same as sending men to the front in ukraine.. it was kill off the white man..
Two of my three siblings got vaccinated. My brother delayed it and said he wouldn't get vaccinated but then news of outbreak of Covid in his area scared him, so he got one shot, but that's all he got. My sister was triple vaccinated, as were her son and his wife. They all got Omicron, my nephew, and his wife, I believe, got Omicron twice after being triple vaccinated.
Thank you, Steve, for having a field day - like no other! - with this study and defending Jay's decision. You are a heavy counterweight to the clueless lightweights spinning yarns at NYT.
I agree with your last sentence, that "We need more people like Jay in public service." Were Makary and Hoeg such people? It's a shame they're out. And I find it peculiar no one is talking about it.
WSJ 9 May 2026. Knives are out for Makary. Pharma complaining and anti abortion complaining, looks to me to be ochestrated as with Jay Bhatt sadly the political tide is turning. Trump no longer needs RFKjr votes.
So Trump forced Makary out? Hoeg as well?
Maybe not Trump personally, but it sure looks like Makary is no longer useful to the current US Adminstration.
I have a few questions for the study authors also:
Do they like old TV westerns like Have Gun Will Travel, Maverick and Want a Dead or Alive, not to mention dozens of others?
Do they go to the beach often and do they body surf?
Do any of them have a car that can do 0 to 60 in under four seconds?
Do they have pets and if so what kind of pets do they have?
Are any of them vegan, vegetarian, lacto-ovo vegetarian, or eat a mix of meat, fruit and vegetables, or are they mostly carnivorous?
When they put their shoes on, do they put one sock on and one shoe, then the other sock and the other shoe, or do they put both socks on and then their shoes?
There are many other questions that could be asked.
Many researchers have pointed out that Pfizer's clinical trial reports were riddled with various manipulations.
While the relative efficacy rate (RRR) of these manipulated reports (which better illustrated the effects of m1Ψ-mRNA) was 95%, the absolute efficacy rate (ARR) that was significant for individuals was only 0.716%.
(m1Ψ-mRNA refers to BNT162b2 and mRNA1273)
It is wrong for the CDC and FDA to advertise efficacy rates using RRR.
There is a definition formula in the fundamentals of medicine. RRR ≡ (Number of cases in placebo group - Number of cases in vaccinated group) / Number of cases in placebo group * 100 [%]
ARR ≡ [1 - {1 - Number of cases in placebo group / Total number of placebo participants} / {1 - Number of cases in vaccinated group / Total number of vaccinated participants}] * 100 [%]
From Pfizer's clinical trial report
＿＿＿＿＿＿Total trial＿＿＿Infections＿＿＿Non-infections＿＿＿｜Non-infection rate
Number of vaccinated people＿＿＿21500 people＿＿＿8 people＿＿＿21492 people＿＿｜ 99.962%
Number of unvaccinated people＿＿ 21500 people＿＿＿162 people＿＿21338 people＿＿｜ 99.246%
If you calculate this for other conventional vaccines, the absolute efficacy rate ARR will usually be less than 1%.
In science, it is important to look at the meaning of numerical values from various angles.
At .0716% ARR (Absolute Risk Ratio) that equates by my calculation to a NNT (Number Needed to Treat = 1/ARR) of 140. Much prefer NNTs I can visualise the group of people. Of course the age group will matter significantly.
So we are injecting 140 healthy people with a novel vaccine that claims to prevent 1 person from getting covid - really!
You're absolutely right.
I emailed the CDC asking them to at least add ARR to the vaccine labeling in addition to RRR, but of course, they ignored me.
I think about 90% of general practitioners mistakenly believe that RRR represents the probability that an individual will not be infected.
"The Covid-19 Vaccine Was The Biggest Experiment Of Humanity."
~Dr. Robert Malone
"The Covid-19 Vaccines have failed to meet their advertised efficacy and have instead been associated with unprecedented levels of injury and death compared to any previous vaccines in history."
~Dr. Colleen Huber, Naturopathic physician
Was The Pfizer Covid Vaccine Tested?
"No, we did not know whether the vaccine stopped transmission before we rolled it out. We had to really move at the speed of science to understand what is taking place in the market. And at that point of view, we had to do everything at risk."
~Janine Small, President of International Developed Markets for Pfizer, testified before the European Parliament (October 10, 2022)
https://archive.org/details/10.10.22-eu-parliament-janine-small-admits-pfizer-covid-vaccine-untested_202210
"[The mRNA Covid Vaccine roll-out] is going to be bigger than the Holocaust. We've got to be somewhere between 10 and 20 million people that have been killed by these experimental vaccines worldwide, and it's still going up."
~Andrew Bridgen, Ex-British MP
https://x.com/its_The_Dr/status/1913216144682393993?lang=en
"I actually think that the whole pandemic was a Trojan Horse for vaccines."
~Dr. Stella Immanuel
THE PLANDEMIC
"The VACCINE was not brought in for COVID. COVID was brought in for the VACCINE. Once you realize that, everything else makes sense."
~Dr. Reiner Fuellmich
"Autopsies have now proven the mRNA shots are deadly. Nearly 74% of those tested showed it was THE cause of death."
~Dr. Peter McCullough, Cardiologist
*‘Covid Vaccines caused 74% deaths’: Dr. Peter McCullough shocks Senate
https://youtu.be/_JyzTAmPXcw
There is an extremely strong hint that the outcome was predetermined, and to make the outcome appear legitimate to the lay reader esecially, critical points were deliberately left alone. They know they did wrong from the get-go, so now they have committed themselves to lying to cover the lies already told. Premeditated manslaughter is murder.
CDC is corrupt, and accept that they did not hide it. They killed any questions. Forced jabb os jutt the same as sending men to the front in ukraine.. it was kill off the white man..
Does anyone know anyone who got the shot and didn't "catch" the disease?
Two of my three siblings got vaccinated. My brother delayed it and said he wouldn't get vaccinated but then news of outbreak of Covid in his area scared him, so he got one shot, but that's all he got. My sister was triple vaccinated, as were her son and his wife. They all got Omicron, my nephew, and his wife, I believe, got Omicron twice after being triple vaccinated.
Follow the money 💰 always
Thank you, Steve, for having a field day - like no other! - with this study and defending Jay's decision. You are a heavy counterweight to the clueless lightweights spinning yarns at NYT.
God bless.