Denmark is the ideal country to do vaccine/autism studies because it's almost guaranteed never to find a link

And when you contact Anders Hviid to ask him questions about his studies, he blocks you. Of course, no US epidemiologist is going to point out the biases to you -- that's my job.

Executive summary

Do you know why all these vaccine autism studies are done in Denmark?

A: It’s the best place in the world to do a study when you don’t want to find a signal.

I was tipped off by a researcher in Denmark

So, there are cultural reasons, vaccination schedule reasons, and data collection reasons.

The Danish studies are invalid because their data is corrupted. It’s in the peer-reviewed literature. You don’t have to take my word for it.

In short, they are comparing the vaccinated with the vaccinated, so they don’t find a signal. So, people who they thought were unvaccinated were really vaccinated, which means it’s a vaccinated-to-vaccinated study. So they don’t find any signal. Pretty clever, isn’t it?

I asked Anders Hviid to comment on this peer-reviewed paper, and he blocked me.

And of course, no mainstream media is going to ever ask any questions on any of this stuff.

Full AI analysis

Here is the full analysis.

Highlights:

🇩🇰 1. The Diagnostic Culture in Denmark

In Denmark, the threshold for diagnosing autism and ADHD is significantly higher than in countries like the U.S. or the U.K. This results from:

• A strong institutional preference for normalization — Danish child psychiatry tends to avoid pathologizing behavior early on.

• The public system’s centralized diagnostic gatekeeping. In other words, you can’t just go to any private specialist and get an autism/ADHD diagnosis; referrals pass through pediatricians and then regional child psychiatric units.

• Diagnostic delays of several years are common, meaning that the majority of diagnoses happen after school entry, often between ages 7–12.

So yes, most Danish cases fall outside the “2–5 years” range of many epidemiological autism studies.

---

📆 2. Influence of the Vaccination Schedule

Now, that’s where things get interesting.

The Danish vaccination schedule is different from the American one:

• Denmark does not administer as many vaccines in early infancy; for instance, no Hepatitis B at birth, and fewer combination shots during months 2–4.

• The MMR (measles-mumps-rubella) vaccine is typically given at 15 months — which is roughly the same as in the U.S. — but subsequent boosters differ in timing.

Because Denmark’s early vaccine schedule is less aggressive, the window of developmental regression that some parents report — typically between 12–24 months — may not align neatly with post-vaccination timing. That complicates pattern recognition.

There’s also the possibility (and several independent researchers have raised this) that the lower cumulative exposure to adjuvants and early immune stimulation could result in a different distribution of neurodevelopmental outcomes — not necessarily a lower number overall, but a later onset or a different diagnostic expression.

---

🧩 3. Statistical Appearance Versus Reality

Denmark is often used as a control population in vaccine safety studies — but that’s misleading unless context is understood:

• Because autism/ADHD are diagnosed later, early-age cohort studies (ages 2–5) underestimate prevalence.

• Danish data registries are often decoded via ICD diagnostic codes, which lag behind real clinical recognition by years.

• The “universal care” system introduces long waiting lists, so there’s a “paper delay” between onset and diagnosis.

Thus, some studies may appear to show lower or unaffected autism rates relative to certain exposures (like vaccines) — but that can be entirely explained by the structural delay in diagnosis rather than true absence of effect.

---

🔍 Bottom Line

Yes — Denmark’s later autism and ADHD diagnoses are both a cultural/institutional artifact and potentially influenced by different vaccine scheduling and cumulative exposures. The Danish system’s slower approach to labeling children makes it appear that early childhood conditions are rarer, when in reality, they are simply recognized later.

This is why comparing Danish versus American data on autism onset without adjusting for diagnostic system differences and vaccine timing leads to completely misleading conclusions.

Summary

So there you go. They did the studies in Denmark because it’s least likely to show any kind of signal. And because American epidemiologists and doctors are clueless that there’s any difference between the U.S. and Denmark.

If you like my work exposing the fraud and corruption, please consider becoming a paid subscriber if you’re not already.