I asked her about AB 2098, the California bill regulating speech between doctors and their patients about COVID-19. Whether Cindy is for or against it depends on how you describe it.
Because different people come to Steve's articles, posts and the comments at different times, from time to time I repost a link to a short essay re: the 19th century figure Dr. Ignaz Semmelweiss.
This interview with Cindy Eaton (and its sequelae) prompts a repost.
Physician Ignaz Semmelweiss endured incredible hostility, ridicule and vilification for the sin of being right about an easy measure for virtually eradicating puerperal ("childbed") fever which had been killing new mothers and infants at an appalling rate.
The vilification persisted EVEN THOUGH Dr. Semmelweiss's patients survived while huge numbers of other doctors' maternal patients succumbed.
As the writer observes in her essay "What Semmelweiss Taught Me": "The tendency to reject anything that challenges established views is a universal psychological phenomenon....It applies not just to science but to every sphere of human life."
If by "interesting" you mean the same as any other time in human history, I agree. Galileo went against "consensus science" and died under house arrest. There have been many others unmentioned. It will never end. Is it power that so many "authorities" ignore intelligent debate? Schools certainly haven't done a good job educating people on what science really is. Life is nuanced, complex, and subtle. We humans HATE this and simplify everything then demand others agree with us or we will... hate them, burn them, kill them, silence them... it's called insecurity. Because if we are wrong, we could be screwed. Best to pretend we're right, ignore signals to the contrary, and suppress other ideas so we can be and feel secure.
He's refering to the admission by Pfizer that they didn't test to see if the shot prevented transmission bec. they were "moving at the speed of science." This is getting a lot of play in soc media right now, as if it were new information (those of us paying attention last year already knew it).
So this "new" (to them, Dr. John etc) info definitely opens a window of opportunity to hammer home the ineptitude, corruption, etc. of the usual suspects and rachets DOWN the public trust yet another level.
Steve ! You know you’re my number one man crush and hero rolled all into one. Hehehe keep advocating for folks like me . Our lives do depend on it and I will be forever greatful for you and the others such as dr Kory, Dr Marik ( my paw paw man crush) , Dr Malone , Dr McCullough, Dr Thorpe , Dr Cole and anyone else I’m forgetting due to my short memory sucks! Keep up the good work! Hopefully one day I’ll be able to give each one of you a big ole LG hug in person!
Love always, long Haulin with LG clot shot style - Lyndsey Nicole House, RN
...However there is also a much shorter funny way that lets on one page to prove that the share of genuine Covid-19 deaths in the official "deaths involving Covid-19" group (DIC) can be only a very small one. =the average number of chronic conditions in the DIC group is not (noticeably/importantly) increased for its age-structure. If Covid-19 really killed all those people of the DIC group then should have had actively shortened their lives. And so there is the question: who is easier to kill by the infection, a 75-year-old-one with an age-standard 5 conditions who should otherwise live for 14 more years (for details please look into the article on Zenodo) or a much more ill (much weaker) 75 year-old-one with over 15 chronic conditions who should otherwise live for <5 years? Of course much more difficult (on average) to kill is the one with 5 conditions. But Covid-19 is not "interested" in picking up to kill the weakest ones by their number of chronic conditions. However there are two factors deciding about weakness of the organism. A number of conditions in only one of them and the second one is an age. So covid-19 should be also not interested in picking up to kill weaker ones by an age and then the average age of its victims would be only 40 years! ...Thus, solely the not increased age-standard average number of conditions proves there are in a huge majority unreal Covid-19 deaths in the DIC group as in a group composed of real Covid-19 victims the average number of conditions should be much increased and the average age much decreased when compared to all deaths (due to "aging") in the society in 2020
Pfizer director admits that they never tested against transmission. Where's the article and the lawsuit assembly. Bring this wall of bs down. Coughvid and the con shots. We should be using our military equipment to tear down the medical fascism rooted in the CDC, FDA, Pfizer and J&J. Not murdering innocent children in the Middle East
There is a bill currently floating in a province of Australia which will make ANY deviation from official medical narratives by a physician will be cause for license revocation. It is expected that such a bill will soon be the national norm.
Like mandating that businesses require workers take the injection (including physician employers), the takeover of medicine by the state will increasingly require those compensated for services by the state to be agents of the state primarily.
Who determines what the "consensus" is and how? What if the consensus changes? How would that be determined? And, how can there even be a consensus if everyone is afraid to speak their mind for fear of censure?
Thanks Steve for never giving up..I presume it is exhausting dealing with the “Cindys” you encounter!
Because different people come to Steve's articles, posts and the comments at different times, from time to time I repost a link to a short essay re: the 19th century figure Dr. Ignaz Semmelweiss.
This interview with Cindy Eaton (and its sequelae) prompts a repost.
Physician Ignaz Semmelweiss endured incredible hostility, ridicule and vilification for the sin of being right about an easy measure for virtually eradicating puerperal ("childbed") fever which had been killing new mothers and infants at an appalling rate.
The vilification persisted EVEN THOUGH Dr. Semmelweiss's patients survived while huge numbers of other doctors' maternal patients succumbed.
As the writer observes in her essay "What Semmelweiss Taught Me": "The tendency to reject anything that challenges established views is a universal psychological phenomenon....It applies not just to science but to every sphere of human life."
Here's the link: https://tinyurl.com/mpk6rx9t
If by "interesting" you mean the same as any other time in human history, I agree. Galileo went against "consensus science" and died under house arrest. There have been many others unmentioned. It will never end. Is it power that so many "authorities" ignore intelligent debate? Schools certainly haven't done a good job educating people on what science really is. Life is nuanced, complex, and subtle. We humans HATE this and simplify everything then demand others agree with us or we will... hate them, burn them, kill them, silence them... it's called insecurity. Because if we are wrong, we could be screwed. Best to pretend we're right, ignore signals to the contrary, and suppress other ideas so we can be and feel secure.
Cindy Eaton should be ashamed of herself. What a ridiculous, spineless minion. Grow a pair, lady.
Not about Cindy, but since this is currently your most recent post...
Dr. John Campbell: "breaking international scandal." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J6VbI8gOnUM
He's refering to the admission by Pfizer that they didn't test to see if the shot prevented transmission bec. they were "moving at the speed of science." This is getting a lot of play in soc media right now, as if it were new information (those of us paying attention last year already knew it).
So this "new" (to them, Dr. John etc) info definitely opens a window of opportunity to hammer home the ineptitude, corruption, etc. of the usual suspects and rachets DOWN the public trust yet another level.
Steve ! You know you’re my number one man crush and hero rolled all into one. Hehehe keep advocating for folks like me . Our lives do depend on it and I will be forever greatful for you and the others such as dr Kory, Dr Marik ( my paw paw man crush) , Dr Malone , Dr McCullough, Dr Thorpe , Dr Cole and anyone else I’m forgetting due to my short memory sucks! Keep up the good work! Hopefully one day I’ll be able to give each one of you a big ole LG hug in person!
Love always, long Haulin with LG clot shot style - Lyndsey Nicole House, RN
Big Brother is out of Control..
Remember Your DNA "Ancestry Kit"?
Police are now using Predictive Family Genotyping to Generate Suspect Images Worldwide
https://jimychanga.substack.com/p/remember-your-dna-ancestry-kit
I think in your 'peer review "reputable journals" ' you will not find many interesting things as too dangerous for Big Pharma ones are being censored.
BUT ...the real number of Covid-20 deaths in 2020 was only about 20.000 and it is clearly proven :
https://zenodo.org/record/7135456 = vaccinations could not save lives of any of a 95%-subgroup.
...However there is also a much shorter funny way that lets on one page to prove that the share of genuine Covid-19 deaths in the official "deaths involving Covid-19" group (DIC) can be only a very small one. =the average number of chronic conditions in the DIC group is not (noticeably/importantly) increased for its age-structure. If Covid-19 really killed all those people of the DIC group then should have had actively shortened their lives. And so there is the question: who is easier to kill by the infection, a 75-year-old-one with an age-standard 5 conditions who should otherwise live for 14 more years (for details please look into the article on Zenodo) or a much more ill (much weaker) 75 year-old-one with over 15 chronic conditions who should otherwise live for <5 years? Of course much more difficult (on average) to kill is the one with 5 conditions. But Covid-19 is not "interested" in picking up to kill the weakest ones by their number of chronic conditions. However there are two factors deciding about weakness of the organism. A number of conditions in only one of them and the second one is an age. So covid-19 should be also not interested in picking up to kill weaker ones by an age and then the average age of its victims would be only 40 years! ...Thus, solely the not increased age-standard average number of conditions proves there are in a huge majority unreal Covid-19 deaths in the DIC group as in a group composed of real Covid-19 victims the average number of conditions should be much increased and the average age much decreased when compared to all deaths (due to "aging") in the society in 2020
Steve, where you been?
Pfizer director admits that they never tested against transmission. Where's the article and the lawsuit assembly. Bring this wall of bs down. Coughvid and the con shots. We should be using our military equipment to tear down the medical fascism rooted in the CDC, FDA, Pfizer and J&J. Not murdering innocent children in the Middle East
1. CDC says 90% over 18 in America at least got one juice.
I don't buy this.
What do you guys think? https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#vaccinations_vacc-people-additional-dose-totalpop
I met quite a bit of people who never got it online.
Thoughts?
2. Exactly who tabulates this data? Is it Johns hopkins?
I heard a small number of folks do this tabulation.
Got any clue?
Tucker Carlson drops vaccine Truth Bomb thanks to EU parliament member from The Netherlands.
https://billricejr.substack.com/p/tucker-carlson-tonight-publicizes
There is a bill currently floating in a province of Australia which will make ANY deviation from official medical narratives by a physician will be cause for license revocation. It is expected that such a bill will soon be the national norm.
Like mandating that businesses require workers take the injection (including physician employers), the takeover of medicine by the state will increasingly require those compensated for services by the state to be agents of the state primarily.
Pfizer exec confesses vaccine never even tested on stopping transmission
Lawmaker: 'Get vaccinated for others was always a lie'
https://www.wnd.com/2022/10/pfizer-exec-confesses-vaccine-never-even-tested-stopping-transmission/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=wnd-breaking&utm_campaign=breaking&utm_content=breaking&ats_es=%5B-MD5-%5D
Sounds like some one was listening in on her telling the truth. Phone call… better get that video back or you are fired!
What a complicit tool!
Vaxxed Have Dark Blood
Nurse Whistleblower: The More Shots, the Blacker and Harder to Draw https://jimychanga.substack.com/p/vaxxed-have-dark-blood
Who determines what the "consensus" is and how? What if the consensus changes? How would that be determined? And, how can there even be a consensus if everyone is afraid to speak their mind for fear of censure?