Doug, I agree, that was an excellent podcast. Like you, I almost always agree there must be two sides, but in this case I don’t believe so. If he concentrated half as hard on going after anyone in Big Pharma, government, in the 3 letter agencies or the health departments, then I could agree, but from him it is all talk. We are fighting f…
Doug, I agree, that was an excellent podcast. Like you, I almost always agree there must be two sides, but in this case I don’t believe so. If he concentrated half as hard on going after anyone in Big Pharma, government, in the 3 letter agencies or the health departments, then I could agree, but from him it is all talk. We are fighting for the same cause, but he is viciously attacking some wonderful people in the movement. 25 million is so excessive and surely intentional
to silence anyone else who might want to report the same logical conclusion the Breggins made. Fits the definition of controlled opposition, I would think, harming the movement, not helping.
Doug, I agree, that was an excellent podcast. Like you, I almost always agree there must be two sides, but in this case I don’t believe so. If he concentrated half as hard on going after anyone in Big Pharma, government, in the 3 letter agencies or the health departments, then I could agree, but from him it is all talk. We are fighting for the same cause, but he is viciously attacking some wonderful people in the movement. 25 million is so excessive and surely intentional
to silence anyone else who might want to report the same logical conclusion the Breggins made. Fits the definition of controlled opposition, I would think, harming the movement, not helping.
Thank you for your reasoned comment. I will watch him more carefully, as I could be wrong.