211 Comments
Mar 21, 2023·edited Mar 21, 2023

Western Australians were forced to get the vaccine for work. Many young people had to get the vaccine to attend school or work their part time jobs. Vaccines passports were enforced to enter any establishment other than supermarkets. Many people had adverse reactions, but still had their employer insist that they get further doses or lose their jobs. They even forced anyone entering Western Australia to have it. This included people with heart conditions whose specialists reccomended against it. They ignore advice from peoples own doctors with their own 'medical advice'.

Expand full comment

Thank you Steve for keeping the numbers closer to the true figures. The actual misinformationists are continuing to project what they are doing onto the truth-tellers.

Expand full comment

I guess I'm supposed to feel sorry for Justin Bieber. Well I don't. Anyone who mandates vaccination as a condition for attending their concerts is beyond the pale as far as I'm concerned.

Expand full comment

Excuse me, but can you explain to me why these 'people' need a GO FUND ME page to pay for their funerals or cancer treatments? Again, a bit out of the loop on who and what they appear (ed) to be worth. Oh, now I get it. Just like our reps in this mess, use our monies.

Expand full comment

Be sure to include Rod Stewart (and his teen age son who had a heart attack), The so-called boss Bruce Springsteen, and Celine Dion, among others to your list.

Expand full comment

I will. Thanks for the useful advice. All my Celine Dion CDs will be binned forthwith.

Expand full comment

Did you watch the full Karl Lauterbach video?

https://wp.me/p6DhDK-fYg

Expand full comment

STEVE - YOUR STARTING TO GET IT.

You wrote: "Australia government numbers confirm rate of serious ADVERSE VAXX EVENTS is >1 in 100 doses."

See https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/the-schwab-study-proves-the-covid/comment/13745693 for my excerpts

or my full post at https://forum.demed.com/COVID/posts/oYIBb1xKGgR2JtImpbTy

Rancourt et al (Feb2023) verified my earlier calculation of ~13 million vaxx-caused deaths worldwide (excluding China) to end2022. Rancourt estimated 1 vaxx-caused DEATH for every 1000 Covid-19 vaxx doses and I say that was about right – as I recall, my estimate was about 10% lower, but time will soon close that gap.

https://denisrancourt.ca/entries.php?id=126&name=2023_02_09_age_stratified_covid_19_vaccine_dose_fatality_rate_for_israel_and_australia

So without even re-running your numbers, it is reasonable to assume that vaxx-caused injuries at >1 in 100 doses are ~10 times vaxx-caused deaths at ~1 in 1000 doses.

I’ve been publishing this horrific death tolls for weeks (months?) now, and have generally been ignored. Too many people are fixated on the less important details that we already knew or suspected – who did what, when, to whom, etc. We can get to that later for Nuremberg 2.0 – there is no rush.

Almost nobody has been talking about what we need to do NOW. We need worldwide curative treatments for the vaxx-injured or else millions more will die – my estimate is ~6 million more vaxx-caused deaths by end2023 unless we act NOW.

Contact me if you want to save lives, via Energy-Experts-International.com

Regards, Allan MacRae in Calgary

Expand full comment

Your assumption that the number of deaths equals the number of doses times the number of deaths per dose is a bit misleading in my opinion. Many of those dying will have had more than 1 dose. Also, you need to corroborate your predictions against some other independent indicator of vaccine lethality like excess desths in a population vs total number vaccinated (most with more than 1 dose). According to my estimates, the global death toll from vaccinations is between 6 and 7 million and not the 13 million that you quote.

Expand full comment

In any case David, our points lead to the same conclusion:

MANY MILLIONS HAVE BEEN KILLED BY THE TOXIC COVID-19 INJECTIONS (aka "vaccines").

Based on my analysis, the total global vaxx-caused deaths were ~13 million to end 2022 and will increase by ~45%, based on Alberta rates, to ~19 million by end2023.

While time is slipping away due to inactivity, I believe a distribution program of inexpensive, over-the-counter vaxx-treatments consisting of an "Ivermectin plus" formulation (IVM + Nattokinase?) will save millions of lives.

I am frustrated that influential commentators like Steve Kirsch and others are still preoccupied with the less important issues, such as "who did what to whom" - we know who the chief malefactors are and that's not saving any lives, as this great cull of humanity rolls on. We can arrest, try and imprison those malefactors later at Nuremberg 2.0 - but we can save millions of lives by properly taking action NOW.

Expand full comment

Thanks for your comprehensive reply. Now that I have taken the time to read Rancourt et al. I'm coming round to your estimates especially since my estimate of 40% of the world's population being vaccinated might be on the low side. And you're right, with all this suffering going on the most important objective now is to treat it. I was most interested in the effectiveness of nattokinase and am wondering whether that is the reason the Japanese were completely unaffected by the epidemic, because a lot of them eat a disgusting conconction of fermented soy beans that is called natto.

Expand full comment

I thought they already stated the deaths from Covid injections are between 18 to 20 million already?

Or am I thinking Excess Deaths?

Expand full comment

The global total death estimate depends on the "total deaths" sample used - I used Alberta, Rancourt et al (Feb2023) used Australia and Israel, and we both calculated 13 million vaxx-caused deaths to end 2022. That is a conservative (low) estimate and excludes China.

If I used the higher death toll in the USA, that estimate would probably exceed 20 million vaxx-caused deaths worldwide, but the USA was atypical and horrible - late treatment, toxic Remdesivir, ventilators, $30K bonus to hospitals per death, resulting in many more deaths - medical murder, imo.

I don't know how my American friends tolerated this extreme abuse, particularly of their elderly, who often died alone and in misery., separated from their loved ones.

Expand full comment

Hi David - the estimate of one death per 1000 vaxx-doses is by Rancourt et al - after I read that I ran my own numbers and came up with about 10% less, but time will soon fix that.

I wonder if you carefully read what I wrote above - we have two independent estimates of 13 million Covid-19 vaxx-caused deaths to end 2022 - mine and later Rancourt's, calculated with similar but not identical methodologies and from different total death stats - I used Alberta, and Rancourt used Israel and Australia.

You have just tossed out a number without providing any backup – if you have a methodology and supporting calculations, please provide.

I’d prefer that you were correct – fewer vaxx-deaths is better – but I think my analysis is more correct (and excludes wild cards China and possibly India).

Expand full comment

Thanks for the reply Allan. I recognize that your estimate is probably based on much more rigorous analysis than mine. But I will explain mine as you have kindly deigned to reply to me. To estimated the fatality rate per 1000 vaxxed people (partially or fully), I have used the excess deaths in the UK and Europe since the end of the alleged 2nd wave in February 2021, along with the published number of people vaccinated in those regions. If we take the UK as an example with a population of 69 million and normal monthly deaths of 40,000, the excess death rate of about 15% in 2021 and 2022 gives us 22 x 40,000 x 0.15 = 132,000 deaths attributable to the vaccines. Since 75% of the UK population is vaccinated we get a vaccine fatality rate of 132,000/(69,000 x 0.75) = 2.5 per 1000. The countries in Europe covered by Euromomo are somewhat similar but with varying percentages of the population vaccinated it would make my reply too long for this kind of site. Now let's look at the estimated global death toll. If we assume that 40% of the world's population of 8 billion are vaccinated and multiply that by a fatality rate of 0.0025 we get 0.4 x 8bn x 0.0025 = 8 million.

I concede that this analysis does not include the above normal miscarriages and stillbirths that are also deaths in my opinion, but when I looked at that aspect, the number of deaths were so much greater than even your figure, I felt sure that you had not included them in the estimate of 13 million deaths attributable to the vaccines. Including such deaths increases the overall death toll from the vaccines by at least 30 million. What we are seeing is an atrocity as evil as Mao's Great Leap Forward or the Nazi genocide of Jews and Slavs combined.

Expand full comment

Thank you David.

I initially estimated a much lower death toll for the USA, because I used Alberta as a basis and our physicians managed the Covid-19 illness infinitely better than their USA counterparts. Alberta had no excess deaths above the previous ~5-year trend to 1Jul2020 . Early treatment was the key.

See the huge difference in the death profiles of these two countries, especially in 2020, in the two plots here:

https://forum.demed.com/COVID/posts/oYIBb1xKGgR2JtImpbTy

Globally, there were at least 13 million Covid-19 vaxx-caused deaths to end2022, increasing by 500,000 per month and people say it's not happening. Safeguard those you love.

Best regards.

Expand full comment

Thank both of you for your work.

From the main post above Steve writes, "Those aged 30-49 were hit hardest, with AEFI rates of 314-316 per 100, 000 doses. So this is 3 AEs per 100 doses with URF of 10."

Is this math not considerably off. Top of my head says 3 per hundred would be 3,000 per 100,000, so off by a magnitude?

Expand full comment

Speaking of damning data, an historic, truly jaw-dropping video out of the UK:

Vaccination Problems, UK Parliament

Dr. John Campbell, March 17, 2023

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JvSHD_n3Lyg

TRANSCRIPT

DR. JOHN CAMPBELL: A warm welcome to today's talk Friday the 17th of March. Now today in the British Parliament Mr. Andrew Bridgen gave an incredibly well thought-out, well-researched speech because he's concerned about potential adverse events following covid vaccination. Now as soon as he started to speak everyone from the Houses of Parliament left. It was like a walk-out protest, just a national disgrace. There was two conservative employees left apart from Mr. Bridgen, there was three on the front bench who had to be there. There was no one from Labor, no one from the Liberal Democrats, zero MPs from the Scottish nationalists. Just a complete disgrace. I can only assume they're under orders not to attend because it really was quite incredible. And you can just see the empty benches for yourself. Um. Anyway I'm going to play it. It takes about 10-15 minutes. Um, um. Obviously Mr. Bridgen is privileged and can say things I'm not allowed to say. So let's give him our attention now because it is a remarkably good speech and it does cover a lot of the points that we have talked about ourselves recently on this on this channel. So over to Mr. Bridgen now.

DEPUTY SPEAKER: [inaudible] Bridgen.

[several MPs stand up and start walking out]

ANDREW BRIDGEN: Mr. Deputy Speaker, on the 13th of December last year I was kindly granted an adjournment debate on the potential harms that emergency use experimental mRNA covid-19 vaccines cause. It's fair to say that, that night my life changed. During that speech, in the evidenced data I presented to the House, which no one has effectively rebutted, I highlighted to the Minister the scale of harms the experimental vaccines have caused and continue to cause. In giving that speech to an almost empty chamber, on this most important of issues — quite literally life and death — two things happened to me immediately. First, I was canceled by the mainstream media. Despite sending a data sheet in the wake of the debate, scientifically evidencing every point that I made, no, not one media organization wanted to talk about the issue of serious harms or death occurring as a result of the mRNA vaccines.

Mr. Deputy Speaker, I fully expect that they will show the same level of disinterest in today's debate. It's what we've come to expect from a media more interested in navel gazing at the pontifications of Britain's foremost football pundit instead of the horror and tragedy of excess deaths taking place before their very eyes.

... continue reading transcript of the YT video at

https://transcriberb.dreamwidth.org/70207.html

NOTE: The transcript of Andrew Bridgen's speech is on his webpage at:

https://www.andrewbridgen.com/parliament/andrew-bridgen-leads-debate-mrna-covid-19-booster

Expand full comment

In my dreams, I hear Dr John's kind voice saying "a warm welcome to Nuremburg, the site of today's proceedings."

Expand full comment

I said NAD+. I do injections. I also follow Dr Mercola’s protocol for NAD. I didn’t intend to give directions, just suggestions what an individual can research. I have no intention to tell people what to do. : )

Expand full comment

I do injections. As well as Dr Mercola’s Protocol. I giving a protocol just something to look into. : )

Expand full comment

These coerced 'Officials' who state that there is no link between Covid 19 Vaccinations and the very high incident rate of Death and serious Injuries are sounding like that huge Egyptian River 'De Nile' following their worn out, now proven otherwise, old Narrative. Their Rhetoric is like an old long playing Wax Record on an old Turntable where the Needle has stuck in one place !! And People have moved on from that .

Expand full comment

"They're" getting hit in the face with confirmation of the depopulation program that "They" wanted, while either ignoring or vehemently denying that THEY promulgated this. Here you go:

"Swine Flu: What I Believe" is a July 2009 blog post by Catherine Austin Fitts, former Ass't Sec'y of H.U.D. from her solari.com website. It is spot on in it's predictions about depopulation and it's still up on Scoop News: https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0907/S00250.htm Here's an excerpt:

As my efforts to find ways of reengineering government investment in communities failed to win political support, Washington and Wall Street moved forward with a debt bubble and globalization that was horrifying in its implications for humanity.

Overwhelmed by what was happening, I estimated the end result. My simple calculations guessed that we were going to achieve economic sustainability on Earth by depopulating down to a population of approximately 500 million people from our then current global population of 6 billion. I was a portfolio strategist used to looking at numbers from a very high level. Those around me could not fathom how all the different threads I was integrating could lead to such a conclusion. To me, we had to have radical change in how we governed resources or depopulate. It was a mathematical result.

https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0907/S00250.htm

Expand full comment

Yes, a change in how we manage, but not due to an energy shortage, or running out of "stuff". Our shortages are man made. There is plenty of earth. https://chiefio.wordpress.com/2009/03/20/there-is-no-energy-shortage/https://chiefio.wordpress.com/2009/05/08/there-is-no-shortage-of-stuff/

Expand full comment

I am so sorry. Check the FLCCC protocols and look into methylene blue and NAD+ therapy

Expand full comment

Update and say liposomal NAD. It must be so absorbed to work.

Expand full comment

Those numbers took my breath away. I read an article years ago about a vaccine being pulled from the market after 7 deaths. Now, I'm old and can't remember the vaccine or what it was for but I remember thinking it was a shame 7 people had to die for the vaccine to be pulled. I was walking from my kitchen to my living room with a cup of tea when I read the Australian numbers and your data on what the numbers most likely really are and all the breath went out of my lungs and my knees got weak. Why would governments be so willing to kill their tax base? My only guess is they're all in on the Great Reset and don't care if they kill us. If they succeed, I can't wait for the Law of Unintended Consequences to catch up to them.

Expand full comment

Let's hope they don't succeed, even if that has to be accomplished by Committees for Public Safety (I find myself eyeing all the high lampposts that arch over the streets here in NYC and pondering how useful they may become), although an orderly process of justice is much to be preferred.

But in the unlikely event they should succeed in getting their way, yes, indeed, the Law of Unintended Consequences will catch up with them. I can't imagine that the world they create--greatly depopulated, all civilization, creativity, intellectual curiosity, sources of joy and humanity crushed and destroyed--would at all be what they expect.

Does the saying "Never ascribe to malice that which can be explained by stupidity" allow for the deadly combination of both those faults? These people, in addition to being clearly malicious and evil, are extraordinarily stupid as well. The world they want to create will be a living hell, and if their lunatic ideas of immortality through transhumanism, merging themselves with machines, come true, that hell will be eternal for them.

They would do well to listen to that other adage, "Be careful what you wish for."

Expand full comment

Very well said. I used to watch the old, black and white episodes of The Twilight Zone and there's one where an old man hates all the people around him. He makes a wish that everyone would just disappear and leave him alone forever. He gets his wish and then he breaks his glasses. He's not an optometrist. That always stuck with me. We might occasionally wish to be alone, but the truth is we need each other and never more than in a crisis.

Expand full comment

The law of unintended consequences is already catching up on them. The rising fury of the general populace is leading to incipient rebellion. You only need to see what has happened in the recent Dutch elections to know that the time is fast approaching when Committees for Public Safety will deal with the oppressors in a way they fully deserve.

Expand full comment

I sincerely hope the mob remembers that everyone deserves a fair trial, but the lifetime of mockery and misery the elite has heaped on the populace tells me that's a vain hope.

Expand full comment

"Swine Flu: What I Believe" is a 2009 blog post by Catherine Austin Fitts, former Ass't Sec'y of H.U.D. It is spot on in it's predictions about and it's still up on Scoop News: https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0907/S00250.htm Here's an excerpt:

As my efforts to find ways of reengineering government investment in communities failed to win political support, Washington and Wall Street moved forward with a debt bubble and globalization that was horrifying in its implications for humanity.

Overwhelmed by what was happening, I estimated the end result. My simple calculations guessed that we were going to achieve economic sustainability on Earth by depopulating down to a population of approximately 500 million people from our then current global population of 6 billion. I was a portfolio strategist used to looking at numbers from a very high level. Those around me could not fathom how all the different threads I was integrating could lead to such a conclusion. To me, we had to have radical change in how we governed resources or depopulate. It was a mathematical result.

Expand full comment

Yes, I read a similar article with the same conclusions but I've also seen articles showing very clearly that current population density isn't an issue if we make some small changes. I don't believe for a second that killing 7.5 billion people is "necessary," no matter what number crunchers think.

Expand full comment

Well, and we hear that birth rates were already falling in northern hemisphere countries before the planned genocide, but now the birth rates are in the negative numbers big time in the most heavily jabbed countries, so they gotta start working on African nations to take the Kool-Aide next time around, playing the race card so to do: "You POOR black people, here, let us Great White Doctors GIVE you these goodies...bwaahHahahaaah"

Expand full comment

The good news is Africans have long memories and it was a huge story in most African countries when Bill Gates experimented on African children and killed or crippled many of them. To Gates, Africans are a throw away people but they're smart enough to learn their lesson after the first time. I hope that means many of them have wised up by now.

Expand full comment

The People likely have-- it's their "leaders" in the W.H.O. that we need to watch, I'd say, unless they are also going to speak out. The five presidents of the nations that elected NOT to receive Pfizer's "largesse" all died untimely and mysterious deaths..

Expand full comment

I didn't know about that, but there's no doubt we're in very dark times. Our own intelligence agencies are playing puppeteer on their own people. I did some research on Generals Patton and MacArthur this weekend and I think it's very likely the CIA killed them both because they spoke out against the U.N. formation and communism. I can't prove that, but if you look into it, their deaths are *very* suspicious. If they were that powerful then, how powerful are they now?

Expand full comment

WEF and it's minions don't care about the tax base, because nearly all the available wealth has been squeezed out of it already. Several years ago, Catherine Austin Fitts described that as one of "Mr. Global's" goals. Basically, take the money and run...

Expand full comment

Those numbers took my breath away. I read an article years ago about a vaccine being pulled from the market after 7 deaths. Now, I'm old and can't remember the vaccine or what it was for but I remember thinking it was a shame 7 people had to die for the vaccine to be pulled. I was walking from my kitchen to my living room with a cup of tea when I read the Australian numbers and your data on what the numbers most likely really are and all the breath went out of my lungs and my knees got weak. Why would governments be so willing to kill their tax base? My only guess is they're all in on the Great Reset and don't care if they kill us. If they succeed, I can't wait for the Law of Unintended Consequences to catch up to them.

Expand full comment

The German data raised my eyebrow, I said "it's gotta be a whole lot more." This confirms it. And the Aussies were SOOOO MEEEEEAN to people to get 'em into the chutes in the slaughterhouse. Sheeesh. "G'day, now let's git down ta bizness and murdah our own peeple!"

Expand full comment
Mar 19, 2023·edited Mar 19, 2023

Even with 1 in 10k that's still around 36000 for the US alone.

Expand full comment