Are you a data scientist? I need you to peer review our work ASAP
Is my latest survey GAME OVER for the vaccine narrative? I'm pretty sure it is because ANYONE can replicate the results in 24 hours and no "judgement" or "government data" is used. Is it bulletproof?
Executive summary
We are very close to shutting down the narrative using data that I believe will be impossible for anyone to refute.
All I need is some help from the data scientists who are reading this article.
Introduction
If you are a data scientist, this is incredibly important… Please read my revised article and view Joel Smalley’s 23 minute video which is referenced in the article:
Joel is convinced that this is “lights out” for the vaccine because the survey results clearly show that at best the vaccine is a dud both for safety and efficacy.
Is he right? Did we make an error?
Then we’ll set up a Zoom, Clubhouse, or Twitter spaces room to discuss.
Assuming you all agree his analysis is correct, we will re-do the survey with 1M reports by using the help of a neutral friend who is simply interested in finding the truth.
Why the survey is so powerful
1M death reports where we know the vaccination status and date of vaccinations of all the deceased is a powerful data that:
It doesn’t rely on government data which can be compromised
It doesn’t rely on the respondent’s judgment
It is very simple
Anyone can replicate the results quickly and inexpensively
Creates very high levels of statistical significance (if there is a signal)
Will be hard to ignore
Will be hard to attack (it’s just analyzing objective data)
Data collected be QA’ed by random sampling the entries to validate the entries are not gamed
Action item if you want to help out
If you are a data scientist and you want to be notified of the meeting, please register yourself here and check the Data scientist checkbox in the Math part of the survey. I’ll email out when we’ll get together with Joel to discuss what was done and whether it can be successfully attacked.
If you are a data scientist (or otherwise skilled in the area to be able to critique Joel’s work), tell us what you think here and in the comments.
REMEMBER, if you DISAGREE with Joel (last item), then your vote won’t count unless you summarize your reasoning in the comments. So far, 30% claim to disagree with Joel, but there is nothing in the comments.
Summary
We simply want to make sure we didn’t miss anything because if his analysis is bulletproof, we are done. It’s over. It will be lights out for the vaccine. We will possess the world’s most powerful weapon against the false narrative.
I've just learned that Antony Fauci actaully INSTRUCTED the government to tell people and hospitals NOT to do autopsies on COVID patient deaths.... That simply shows deliberate criminality and further emphasize why he needs to face the death penalty, along with that Greek veterinarian running Pfizer and many others.
I think we need a separate article with a headline on this topic alone, because it makes all the difference in the world whether safety and cause of death is accurately presented.
Would it be possible for you to have your team look at the German data? I believe it's the largest dataset we have on this topic.
I've done everything I can to vet it at this point and give or take all the arguments that were given by the German government to dismiss it are nonsensical and or deliberately dishonest.
The summarized dataset is here:
https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/the-most-important-dataset-of-the