How much money does MIT get each year from the United States government or NGOs? If the funding is significant, it may come with very specific small print outlining legal liability for contradicting the official narrative of the donor.
Looks like MIT is more involved in participating in the brainwashing that takes place in our educational. If you look down the time line to 2005, and see what MIT starts to develop.
Covid has resulted in the greatest possible repudiation of the MIT values they claim to hold. It's truly stunning how they have negated every single detail of those elaborate and comprehensive values statements. But I'm afraid Covid is merely one in a long list of scientific topics in which the consensus is 180 degrees wrong and any disagreement is blacked out. Climate Change is one (temps were rising before the discovery of fossil fuels, and a warmer, higher CO2 world is better for life), a naturalistic origin of life is another (it violates the laws of chemistry and thermodynamics), the Neo-Darwinian Synthesis of evolution is another, which says that all life arose from a common ancestor (intelligent design has greater explanatory power given the Cambrian Explosion, general stasis and lack of missing links in the fossil record, and the complexity of even the simplest living cell), Economics (Keynesian and Marxian economics are the only schools studied, yet the Austrian School of free market economics is the only one that's right), and so forth. And I haven't touched upon the nonsense on the Humanities and Social Sciences side of University curriculums. All dissent from the mainstream narratives on these topics is absolutely a death sentence for anyone's career. Free inquiry is dead, along with truth.
Apr 15, 2022·edited Apr 15, 2022Liked by Steve Kirsch
I completely agree. My wife and watched this happen. We have two daughters that graduated from the
University of Florida UF six years apart. Things seemed ok for the first. At orientation 2006 you could tell they stressed how to succeed and if you were seeking to be a professional (Physician, Dentist, Lawyer, Pharmacist etc) they stressed prerequisites and the high degree of difficulty and standards to get into these follow on schools. They talked about getting assistance to achieve academic goals. Literally six years later all of that was out the window. All they talked about was how this was a students chance to take and experience things you would never get get the chance to experience again and spent a huge amount of time on progressive social engineering courses. It was bull crap. Both did graduate from medical school but I had to intervene so much for the second daughter. Her advisors would have completely derailed her chances if they could have. It was very disturbing to experience this.
Graphene nano-antennae to create biological nano-networks? To prepare us for the glorious future of mrna vaccines and gene-editing, they slipped it into the "vaccines" (peer-reviewed papers; they've been working on it a while):
There is a dean at Troy University who wants to talk to you about hosting a debate on this campus (my alma mater). Of course, the challenge would be to find ONE public health official or "expert" who would participate in said debate. I still think you need to recruit some journalist who will ask the various officials you have challenged to debates if they would accept your offer. And if not, why not? We all know they are not going to debate you or your team members. Still, getting a few of these people to say this in a public setting would be a minor win for "our" side.
On Tuesday 12 April 2022, the UK Column News team was delighted to be joined by Sir Christopher Chope for a detailed discussion about British Government plans to provide compensation for vaccine adverse reactions, particularly where the impact on a vaccinated individual has been serious and life-changing.
It is perfectly clear that our once world class institutions of higher learning no longer deserve the reputations they have. Academics have regressed into dogma machines,
In the fashion of cowards is my prediction. It appears that MIT is devolving. But on the plus side, we really don't need people like that to know what is going on around us. It looks like higher education has hit new lows.
Stephanie Seneff would be a great sponsor. She's so knowledgeable on the effects of vaccines on the body including the covid vaccine.
Steve - do you know about MIT prof Seneff? Firmly on Team Reality and critical of the vaccines.
https://www.csail.mit.edu/person/stephanie-seneff
https://www.brighteon.com/f4ecfbc0-685c-4774-ac9e-6db6fe462e6c
I would think she'd be happy to sponsor your proposed talk at MIT.
Totally agree
How much money does MIT get each year from the United States government or NGOs? If the funding is significant, it may come with very specific small print outlining legal liability for contradicting the official narrative of the donor.
MIT's internal truth committees will continue to cannibalize itself. It will continue to slide into mediocrity. https://www.mindingthecampus.org/2022/04/12/the-moral-panic-at-mit/
Looks like MIT is more involved in participating in the brainwashing that takes place in our educational. If you look down the time line to 2005, and see what MIT starts to develop.
https://www.coreysdigs.com/health-science/alert-2030-psychological-agenda-obedience-training-for-prek-adults-already-global-with-billions-in-funding-for-full-control-part-9-timeline-580-players-and-conclusion/
Covid has resulted in the greatest possible repudiation of the MIT values they claim to hold. It's truly stunning how they have negated every single detail of those elaborate and comprehensive values statements. But I'm afraid Covid is merely one in a long list of scientific topics in which the consensus is 180 degrees wrong and any disagreement is blacked out. Climate Change is one (temps were rising before the discovery of fossil fuels, and a warmer, higher CO2 world is better for life), a naturalistic origin of life is another (it violates the laws of chemistry and thermodynamics), the Neo-Darwinian Synthesis of evolution is another, which says that all life arose from a common ancestor (intelligent design has greater explanatory power given the Cambrian Explosion, general stasis and lack of missing links in the fossil record, and the complexity of even the simplest living cell), Economics (Keynesian and Marxian economics are the only schools studied, yet the Austrian School of free market economics is the only one that's right), and so forth. And I haven't touched upon the nonsense on the Humanities and Social Sciences side of University curriculums. All dissent from the mainstream narratives on these topics is absolutely a death sentence for anyone's career. Free inquiry is dead, along with truth.
I completely agree. My wife and watched this happen. We have two daughters that graduated from the
University of Florida UF six years apart. Things seemed ok for the first. At orientation 2006 you could tell they stressed how to succeed and if you were seeking to be a professional (Physician, Dentist, Lawyer, Pharmacist etc) they stressed prerequisites and the high degree of difficulty and standards to get into these follow on schools. They talked about getting assistance to achieve academic goals. Literally six years later all of that was out the window. All they talked about was how this was a students chance to take and experience things you would never get get the chance to experience again and spent a huge amount of time on progressive social engineering courses. It was bull crap. Both did graduate from medical school but I had to intervene so much for the second daughter. Her advisors would have completely derailed her chances if they could have. It was very disturbing to experience this.
Graphene nano-antennae to create biological nano-networks? To prepare us for the glorious future of mrna vaccines and gene-editing, they slipped it into the "vaccines" (peer-reviewed papers; they've been working on it a while):
https://lilianeheldkhawam-com.translate.goog/2021/12/16/co-ro-na-pour-systeme-de-coordonnees-et-de-routage-pour-les-nanoreseaux/?_x_tr_sl=fr&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=fr
Outstanding letter and your P.S. nails it! When will you be speaking there?
Coming down on the wrong side od history is one thing.
Pulling around with violators of NUREMBERG code, death penalty offense, is another.
There is a dean at Troy University who wants to talk to you about hosting a debate on this campus (my alma mater). Of course, the challenge would be to find ONE public health official or "expert" who would participate in said debate. I still think you need to recruit some journalist who will ask the various officials you have challenged to debates if they would accept your offer. And if not, why not? We all know they are not going to debate you or your team members. Still, getting a few of these people to say this in a public setting would be a minor win for "our" side.
Please share: UK Column Exclusive: Sir Christopher Chope MP on vaccine adverse reactions and the need for compensation https://www.ukcolumn.org/video/exclusive-sir-christopher-chope-mp-on-vaccine-adverse-reactions-and-the-need-for-compensation
On Tuesday 12 April 2022, the UK Column News team was delighted to be joined by Sir Christopher Chope for a detailed discussion about British Government plans to provide compensation for vaccine adverse reactions, particularly where the impact on a vaccinated individual has been serious and life-changing.
Forget about Senator Murphy. I is one of the snake peddlers.
It is perfectly clear that our once world class institutions of higher learning no longer deserve the reputations they have. Academics have regressed into dogma machines,
In the fashion of cowards is my prediction. It appears that MIT is devolving. But on the plus side, we really don't need people like that to know what is going on around us. It looks like higher education has hit new lows.