167 Comments
Feb 5·edited Feb 5

11 of 12 results from the initially uploaded to pre-print were revised downwards representing 'improved safety profile' in the 'new release' of the study.

Cerebral venous thrombosis was the only unchanged outcome.

Expand full comment

Steve you ask how the New Zealand scientists could have missed this..well they didnt..them and the govt all covering their butts!..nothing to see here!! yea right!

Expand full comment

Fudge a study in school and you flunk; fudge a study in real life, and you get promoted and are touted as an "expert."

Expand full comment

Dirty "science" everywhere being touted as truth. How do these putzes sleep at night? I would have culled myself by now if I'd been responsible for millions of damaged hearts, bodies, minds and lives. There is no honor among thieves.

Expand full comment

Brilliant speech by the only really 'Honourable Member' in the current UK Parliament: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ej5Se4gMRA

Expand full comment

So, it should be a criminal act for any hospital administrator to order that anyone on dialysis awaiting transplant must get 2 mRNA shots, right? In Canada at least two people have already died because they were kicked off the transplant wait list for refusing the shots. My neighbour was near the top of the transplant wait list in 2021, all systems go, and told that she must get 2 mRNA shots to stay on it, so she did. She crashed, was hospitalized for months, her case became ultra urgent for transplant but when tested again for imminent transplant her renal blood supply was clotted and could not support a new kidney. So now she's terminal with no hope. She's kinda bitter. No wonder.

Expand full comment

those new NZ stats happened the same way Biden got 88 million votes.

Expand full comment

Governments are manipulating the numbers all over the place, no different than in VAERS. VAERS throttles reports and does not publish all legitimate reports received. VAERS runs cover for pharma, when it was obligated to be the exact opposite and a pharmacovigilance tool. Liability shield should be rescinded on this point alone. https://www.vaersaware.com/entire-vaers-1990-current

Expand full comment

redacting at the speed of science ...

#Liars, #Thieves, #Murderers

Expand full comment

My vaxxed friend started to complain about "extreme stomach ache". What does this mean?

I am helping her to find doctors right now, because she never had to go to doctors before.

Expand full comment

Pfizer released 770 'adverse events' from the injections (after they were forced to do so before 75 years were up). Gastrointestinal problems are listed. So is ulcerative colitis. I hope your friend recovers.

Expand full comment

my friends are now manifesting the mystery illnesses....auto-immune and prostate cancer....it took 3 yrs and 8 shots but they're finally kicking in. It was like they had a death wish and got it.

Expand full comment

Have your friend contact VSRF's Nurse Angela on X at @MarieAngelaW1 .

Expand full comment

Thank, I will tell her that.

Expand full comment

My ex didnt smoke or drink. No health problems. Got jabbed, diagnosed with liver failure, told he had a year last summer. Our 15 yr old son went with him to get jabbed against my wishes. Prayers and love to all affected and suffering🙏

Expand full comment

A friend who received a transplanted kidney due to a genetic defect was encouraged by his doctor to get the jab two years ago.

Now his transplanted kidney is failing. 💔

Expand full comment

ever thought that there will be NO viable transplantable organs b/c they're full of spike and of no use?? I heard that recently that a young heart was received but full of spike...so it was tossed.

Expand full comment

Terrifying. But part of the plan to get rid of us, the "useless eaters." 🙁

Expand full comment

doesn't negate God's plan.... stay awake and hopeful, it is coming....possibly not in our lifetime, but we don't know that...I'm even more emboldened to believe and to continue rallying for truth.

Expand full comment

With Remdesivir also being used for many alleged covid patients, that would also explain their kidney failure. Were they vaccinated, then got alleged covid and then given Remdesivir? Remdesivir is a known kidney and liver killer.

Expand full comment

My friend in Carlisle (not vaccinated like me) has had both her neighbours drop dead. Both were vaccinated, both in their fifties, one in the house & one out on a walk. Both were perfectly fit before the vaccinations, she pleaded with them not to get vaccinated but they choose to ignore her. Her sister was vaccinated & of ourselves got covid. Her sister ended up on ICU & came very close to dying.

Expand full comment

my neighbor who I tried to wake up just had stroke 2 months ago, he could not connect 2 dots... the jabbs were 100% normal to him and he'll pay for them until he's finished off with pharma murder... it should be on his grave 'I profitted pfarma immensely and proud of it....or 'I gave my life to pfarma'

Expand full comment

I'm of the opinion that we're responsible for our own health. You can eat well, exercise, drink in moderation, stay away from cigarettes, drugs, vaccinations etc. The later is more difficult as it's been drummed into our heads for quite a while now. Penicillin cured everything, the polio, measles vaccines saved millions? Sanitation was the key not big pharma with there snake oils. Electricity is another one that lifted us out of the dark ages, net zero will ultimately deliver us right back to those caves if the WEF gets its way. There playing the same game, at Davos it was we've got to fight misinformation? So they want you to believe there lies & arrest & detain anyone that disagrees with there lies. Plenty have believed these lies, Greta the shill stirs up the youth whilst idiots stick their hands to the room blindly unaware they've been dupped into bringing about their own demise, 1984

Expand full comment

You seem very confused Steve about the meaning of a small P-value obtained from some hypothesis test. You asserted in your post today that a tiny P-value found for some hypothesis test is "clear evidence of a causal relationship". That’s just not true. I suggest that you need to do more serious studying of basics. A good start would be the two excellent textbooks authored by Deborah Mayo in recent years. Not kidding.

Expand full comment

Dr, Dr, Lee,

A small p-value means that the likelihood of the result being chance finding (i.e., that in a comparison of two populations, they actually have the same quantitative characteristic is small, and the smaller the p value, the less likely such difference is by chance, and that therefore, the likelihood is strong that there is a true difference between the two populations. Or as the cartoon jingle goes: 'one of these things is not like the other.' Given the other aspects of proving causality, (B following A in time, biologic plausibility, consistency in different populations (and if applicable across species), dose response (more vaxxes, more kidney injury)--I may have missed one or two, it has been a while since I have taught this, strength of association is the final nail in the coffin of the descedent 'safe and effective' RIP.

Given that the issue here is safety, by FDA standards (and I understand whether you do or not, given that this is not a drug, but a biowarfare countermeasure), general prudence, the knowledge now that the virus never was all that lethal, and with time, it has gotten less lethal--as is usual for novel pathogens (what sane parasite wants to kill the host that it depends upon), the principle of primum no nocere, until a plausible alternative explanation for the signal of kidney damage is found, the assumption should be of causality vaccine ---> kidney damage, and the vaccine pulled from the market, existing stocks destroyed world wide at cost of the producers (they had evidence of the vaxx's toxicity prior to rollout and certainly for a couple years now). The fact that isn't happening is evidence of nefarious intent on TPTB, not that 'correlation doesn't equal causation' and we have to wait for conclusive evidence.

Professor, your point might be valid in a lecture on statistics and the principles of determining causality, and where one can remove the pump handle from the contaminated well. But we are not there now. Not withstanding your and my presence in this comment string, Steve is writing for a lay audience, a sophisticated and knowledgeable one to be sure--one that is aware of the other aspects of reality that condem the vaccines.

Your point is pedantic to the point that I would like to know who signs your paycheck, and who funds the guys that sign your paycheck. (That is not a formal point in the causality chain, but certainly is part of the practical smell test for good faith arguments.)

Have a pleasant day, I am just enjoying the tail end of our second snow storm in 2 weeks, but also our second in 2 years.

Expand full comment

Maybe the remdesivir vaxxxed people were given after being hospitalized contributed to the increase in acute kidney injury. We have a neighbor on dialysis for life that this exact thing happened to.

Expand full comment

Yes, I believe that is the case. Many, many people with (false) positive PCR tests who were perfectly healthy given Remdesivir and it destroyed their kidneys.

Expand full comment