A Very Special VSRF LIVE Tonight: Victory for Ivermectin!
Thursday, March 28th: 7pm Eastern | 4pm Pacific
Tonight’s VSRF LIVE is incredibly special and significant for all of us at The Kirsch Foundation and for countless others fighting the good fight in the health freedom movement all over the globe.
Drs. Paul Marik, M.D., and Mary Talley Bowden, M.D., will join us to discuss the landmark Supreme Court victory late Thursday night in favor of the brave doctors and healthcare workers who have fought tirelessly to end state sponsored misinformation by way of the FDA.
The FDA must now pull down all social media and website posts that relate to using ivermectin for COVID-19, as it has never been allowable for them to discuss or give medical advice. It is now clearly legal precedent that the FDA is not a physician and cannot interfere in the practice of medicine. Dr. Marik reflects, “This vindicates our position that the FDA overstepped its regulatory authority by trying to dictate appropriate medical care.” With this settlement, the FDA finally lost its unjust war on Ivermectin and we can only hope that it is the first of many landmark cases around preserving health freedom and free speech currently in the courts in the wake of the disastrous COVID-19 government overreach.
Given the significance and timeliness of this event, VSRF will postpone our regularly scheduled program on "The War on Natural Health" with Canadian attorney Shawn Buckley until early April. Please join us for this truly epic show and celebrate this critical victory with us in our fight to maintain our precious medical freedoms!
AN IMPORTANT REQUEST FOR SUPPORT FOR VSRF LIVE:
PLEASE support VSRF today. VSRF LIVE depends solely on public donations to bring you the weekly show and NEEDS YOUR FINANCIAL SUPPORT! Please consider donating to VSRF on a monthly basis. Your contributions are tax deductible and VITAL to sustain our efforts each week. We cannot do what we do without your help.
For those willing to contribute, you can make a direct donation here. NO DONATION IS TOO SMALL! Together, we can preserve health freedom for generations to come.
Thank you for your support!
Please share the following links widely, as we are still being shadow banned on social media, including X (Twitter).
Steve, the conclusion of the case literally does not constitute a legal precedent. This is precisely because the case was settled.
Settlements are agreements between parties to resolve a dispute without a court judgment, while precedents are established through court decisions.
As a Medical Freedom Movement we are exactly where we were. The FDA's PR person made a statement that the FDA has not changed their position on ivermectin at all.
I wonder if the FDA and individuals at the FDA could be sued under "42 U.S. Code § 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights" because their illegal actions caused damage to patients whose doctors or hospital obeyed the FDA? I am not an attorney, but remember seeing a civil case in federal court where an employee of a city was fired for making public statements critical of the operation of the city. He sued the City and City Councilman for damages and won a $20,000 judgement, plus the Councilman had to pay not only his own legal bill but $100,000 for the employee's attorney. Seems to me, a lot of people died or suffered damage because of the interference of the FDA in the right of people to accept or refuse legal medical treatment under the care of their licensed doctor.