I added this to my article. This was covered in the earlier articles as well.
Selection bias and other factors create the illusion you cut your death rate in half. No such thing is happening.
THIS IS WHY PEOPLE WHO USE UNVACCINATED AS A COMPARATOR ARE MISLED.
Is the problem, that unvaccinated are not in the database unless they die?
That could explain the bias.
If they were there, then one could make easy comparison with unvaccinated/vaccinated at random selection based on birth year.
Did not study the data to know this.
ThatтАЩs part of the problem. If you get vaccinated, they know you exist. If youтАЩre unvaccinated, they donтАЩt know you exist until you die.
A-ha! got it. Didn't make sense the unvaxed were dying at twice the rate of the vaxed. So... lying with statistics once again.
undefined subscriptions will be displayed on your profile (edit)
Skip for now
For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.
Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.
I added this to my article. This was covered in the earlier articles as well.
Selection bias and other factors create the illusion you cut your death rate in half. No such thing is happening.
THIS IS WHY PEOPLE WHO USE UNVACCINATED AS A COMPARATOR ARE MISLED.
Is the problem, that unvaccinated are not in the database unless they die?
That could explain the bias.
If they were there, then one could make easy comparison with unvaccinated/vaccinated at random selection based on birth year.
Did not study the data to know this.
ThatтАЩs part of the problem. If you get vaccinated, they know you exist. If youтАЩre unvaccinated, they donтАЩt know you exist until you die.
A-ha! got it. Didn't make sense the unvaxed were dying at twice the rate of the vaxed. So... lying with statistics once again.