My friends at the CCCA put together a superb slide deck and video presentation showing the dangers of the Pfizer COVID vaccine. The Moderna and J&J vaccines are even worse.
BTW See slide 22 Missing data. Note within 7 days of injection 409 suspected cases in treatment group 287 in control group. Vaccine Reactogenicity - Vaccine gave them the symptoms.
Then see 46% - 54% treated - control group spread of Suspected Cases. The treated group participants were often not tested to prevent adding to infected group of "vaccinated" participants. Rendering ARR probably if not clearly NEAR ZERO.
The video they produced will be more accessible and persuasive to many. It was on Rumble, then it was taken down quickly. It is still, however, available on bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/video/Ahyktwzj9htd/ . Things get disappeared fast these days, so i will be saving more things to my own repository. 4k Video Downloader is very good for this, and free.
I am re-examining my charitable giving. Today I looked a bit closer at St.Jude Research Hospital and was disappointed, but not surprised. (They forced their employees - and for some reason are now denying the shots have any correlation to reproductive issues, like infertility.) Sorry kids - they need you to be guinea pigs. It's deplorable.
Looks like my donations will be going to those fighting this tyranny.
"There is no immunity from intentional harm--for anyone." Reiner Fullmich
And in the "never let a crisis go to waste" spirit, a new ad, with its own website, addresses treatment, without acknowledging the recent increase in reports of clots, DVT, PE, CVA - notimetowait.com encourages viewers to seek medical attention at the first sign of trouble. They've got the meds!
Saw this on twitter last night, someone had tweeted this summary from your newsletter. It is difficult to argue with this much evidence. Refreshing to see the Canadian doctors come to the party. Britain has the Hart Group, Italy, France, Germany, Indonesia, South America, Africa, every country witnessing the death and destruction post vaxx. It would be nice if you joined in.
If you're asking for Steve to join in? He's in Twitter heaven. I don't understand why everyone doesn't drop Twitter and Facebook? Especially Twitter! Nothing gets settled in 600 characters. The entire platform is for self promotion or instigation. At least that's how it appears to me. I never thought internet texting or text wars mostly would catch on. Just doesn't come across as very masculine to me
Thanks for pushing this very useful info. I did a collection of 350+ internet links some tier 1 most tier 2 with more hard data and some tier 3 medical. Zoom 200% for viewing & clik the links are live. Yes I've been sending this around. The pdf file is 100k at this share-
Thank you for this, Steve. That CCCA presentation is very, very good. Even the most statistically challenged can grasp things after watching this (ARR and RRR will be a breeze for me now). And the shortfalls and cover-ups of the sham trials are now so glaringly obvious, you would have to be seriously deficient on the comprehension front not to get it. Really excellent - thanks, CCCA.
I believe it's a very low probability that this report or any report would change his mind. Let me explain.
A bit about me first. My formal college education is mathematics and engineering, but like Steve, I worked in Silicon Valley, made a bunch of money in tech and decided to take a detour into law enforcement where I was a low paid government investigator for many years. The State required us to take a lot of classes about human behavior, body language, writing analysis, etc. in order to quickly get at the truth from people. The obvious reason is that you could spin your wheels forever going down blind alleys based on a bunch of lies. You would also make your prosecuting attorney look like an idiot with false facts and end up with a very short career. As Dr House used to say in his classic TV series - "everybody lies". It's true. Especially crooks.
Here's one of my observations based on my investigator training and years of practice. This type of thinking and analysis is more art than science, but it managed to keep me alive on the streets and my prosecuting attorneys never lost a single case so I must have done something right.
In his discussion with Steve, Dr Ozonoff was pedantic about definitions. To the point of obnoxious and counterproductive really. Ok, maybe that's not a bad thing for a PhD researcher, but did Dr Ozonoff ever acknowledge that his precious definition of a vaccine had to be changed for this experimental gene therapy injection to even be called a vaccine, much less function like one? More importantly, did he ever acknowledge WHY the vaccine definition was changed? Therein lies the real gold mine. The answer is a resounding no because it would shatter Dr Ozonoff's belief structure. Dr Ozonoff seemed like a nice guy and I didn't see any signs of deception with commission (deception by omission is a different matter - he was very careful to avoid saying anything where deception might have transpired), but what I observed told me his conclusions are religious, not scientific. Moreover, I didn't see any indication that he was consciously aware of it and that's a classic sign of cult programming.
Circling back to the original proposition. You can't deprogram someone with a report. You need therapist for that.
Sorry, this was kinda long. Hopefully at least interesting.
You are very likely right, and thanks for taking the time to explain! I thought his "behavior" was best characterized by a combination of religiosity/cult behavior and ignorance about how the real world works, but with positive signs of curiosity to learn. It is the latter that I was hoping to reach!
CCCA sorry not CCCD
I don't know if you'll see this. Deanna McLeod (CCCD) is discussing the document live with Reiner Füllmich #87 https://odysee.com/@Corona-Investigative-Committee:5/87:f33
This is the best PDF I have seen on Pfizer's Fraud unscientific "Study". Should be shared to all health personal.
This document is read and download only i would like to print it out
Hi Steve, thank you for all your amazing work!
I'm having trouble finding the 8 vs 162 no. of cases from the video explaining RRR vs ARR within the pfizer study link (https://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMoa2110345?articleTools=true). In the pfizer study link all I can find is 77 vs 850.
Am I missing something?
I need to show some people the actual data and explain to them RRR vs ARR.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC7996517/
BTW See slide 22 Missing data. Note within 7 days of injection 409 suspected cases in treatment group 287 in control group. Vaccine Reactogenicity - Vaccine gave them the symptoms.
Then see 46% - 54% treated - control group spread of Suspected Cases. The treated group participants were often not tested to prevent adding to infected group of "vaccinated" participants. Rendering ARR probably if not clearly NEAR ZERO.
Thank you, I see the 8 vs 162 in the Dec 31, 2020 report.
Incredibly worrying how this study was accepted for a jab to be used on billions of people. The more I learn about it the worse it gets!
The video they produced will be more accessible and persuasive to many. It was on Rumble, then it was taken down quickly. It is still, however, available on bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/video/Ahyktwzj9htd/ . Things get disappeared fast these days, so i will be saving more things to my own repository. 4k Video Downloader is very good for this, and free.
Thanks for posting the video. Powerfully damning info
I am re-examining my charitable giving. Today I looked a bit closer at St.Jude Research Hospital and was disappointed, but not surprised. (They forced their employees - and for some reason are now denying the shots have any correlation to reproductive issues, like infertility.) Sorry kids - they need you to be guinea pigs. It's deplorable.
Looks like my donations will be going to those fighting this tyranny.
"There is no immunity from intentional harm--for anyone." Reiner Fullmich
Slide 9 needs a title for this maneuver such as "The Fauci Feign". Given that he has a history of doing this with other drugs as well.
Wondering what J&J did to fall out of favor?
In other news, we now know Pfizer and Microsoft backed the SDP in Germany: https://freewestmedia.com/2021/12/17/pfizer-and-microsoft-sponsored-party-of-new-german-health-minister/
It does seem claims of big Pharma running the show have supporting evidence.
And in the "never let a crisis go to waste" spirit, a new ad, with its own website, addresses treatment, without acknowledging the recent increase in reports of clots, DVT, PE, CVA - notimetowait.com encourages viewers to seek medical attention at the first sign of trouble. They've got the meds!
Saw this on twitter last night, someone had tweeted this summary from your newsletter. It is difficult to argue with this much evidence. Refreshing to see the Canadian doctors come to the party. Britain has the Hart Group, Italy, France, Germany, Indonesia, South America, Africa, every country witnessing the death and destruction post vaxx. It would be nice if you joined in.
If you're asking for Steve to join in? He's in Twitter heaven. I don't understand why everyone doesn't drop Twitter and Facebook? Especially Twitter! Nothing gets settled in 600 characters. The entire platform is for self promotion or instigation. At least that's how it appears to me. I never thought internet texting or text wars mostly would catch on. Just doesn't come across as very masculine to me
Greed exploited fear and ignorance that is what we learned!
Thanks for pushing this very useful info. I did a collection of 350+ internet links some tier 1 most tier 2 with more hard data and some tier 3 medical. Zoom 200% for viewing & clik the links are live. Yes I've been sending this around. The pdf file is 100k at this share-
http://pdfhost.io/v/Qz4IRnZJW_novaxx4txt_Notepad
Thanks again for helping humanity stop this global catastrophe
Your link doesn't link to a body of cov8d related stuff.
Yes it does. A pdf with 350 plus articles divided into sections. You need a pdf reader on your device.
Thank you for this, Steve. That CCCA presentation is very, very good. Even the most statistically challenged can grasp things after watching this (ARR and RRR will be a breeze for me now). And the shortfalls and cover-ups of the sham trials are now so glaringly obvious, you would have to be seriously deficient on the comprehension front not to get it. Really excellent - thanks, CCCA.
Does anyone know what the placebo was in this trial, was it truly placebo?
Someone commented below that Vax trials never use real placebos. Said that meningitis vaccine was used in place of placebo. Killed 15.
I see that, but is it verified? This is a n extremely important point that completely changes every conclusion from the trials!
Dr. Ozonoff may benefit from this report!
I believe it's a very low probability that this report or any report would change his mind. Let me explain.
A bit about me first. My formal college education is mathematics and engineering, but like Steve, I worked in Silicon Valley, made a bunch of money in tech and decided to take a detour into law enforcement where I was a low paid government investigator for many years. The State required us to take a lot of classes about human behavior, body language, writing analysis, etc. in order to quickly get at the truth from people. The obvious reason is that you could spin your wheels forever going down blind alleys based on a bunch of lies. You would also make your prosecuting attorney look like an idiot with false facts and end up with a very short career. As Dr House used to say in his classic TV series - "everybody lies". It's true. Especially crooks.
Here's one of my observations based on my investigator training and years of practice. This type of thinking and analysis is more art than science, but it managed to keep me alive on the streets and my prosecuting attorneys never lost a single case so I must have done something right.
In his discussion with Steve, Dr Ozonoff was pedantic about definitions. To the point of obnoxious and counterproductive really. Ok, maybe that's not a bad thing for a PhD researcher, but did Dr Ozonoff ever acknowledge that his precious definition of a vaccine had to be changed for this experimental gene therapy injection to even be called a vaccine, much less function like one? More importantly, did he ever acknowledge WHY the vaccine definition was changed? Therein lies the real gold mine. The answer is a resounding no because it would shatter Dr Ozonoff's belief structure. Dr Ozonoff seemed like a nice guy and I didn't see any signs of deception with commission (deception by omission is a different matter - he was very careful to avoid saying anything where deception might have transpired), but what I observed told me his conclusions are religious, not scientific. Moreover, I didn't see any indication that he was consciously aware of it and that's a classic sign of cult programming.
Circling back to the original proposition. You can't deprogram someone with a report. You need therapist for that.
Sorry, this was kinda long. Hopefully at least interesting.
You are very likely right, and thanks for taking the time to explain! I thought his "behavior" was best characterized by a combination of religiosity/cult behavior and ignorance about how the real world works, but with positive signs of curiosity to learn. It is the latter that I was hoping to reach!