Here we sit, engaging in debate over which of these products is more deadly, meanwhile thousands are dead, many more are irreversibly injured, and the general public has been gaslit into faith in science.
What’s the issue? Why isn’t this data compelling enough to cause outrage?
They simply have no idea what is being discussed. They don’t u…
Here we sit, engaging in debate over which of these products is more deadly, meanwhile thousands are dead, many more are irreversibly injured, and the general public has been gaslit into faith in science.
What’s the issue? Why isn’t this data compelling enough to cause outrage?
They simply have no idea what is being discussed. They don’t understand statistics, p-values, confidence intervals, or anything of the like.
Beyond that, and perhaps most relevant, they don’t understand HOW the jabs work. They do not live in a world where it is plausible that the jabs can cause injury. These products are a black box, believed to “reduce the risk of hospitalization and death” somehow. Does anyone know how they do it?
Mainstream experts do, but it’s too complicated to explain and they don’t have time. They are “safe and effective” and that’s all we need to now.
So what’s is your average person supposed to do with this data? It’s expert opinion vs expert opinion, and they do not have the tools to discern who is telling the truth. Safe and effective? Or useless and deadly?
The truth becomes obvious when the mechanism of action is understood.
Whether the product is modified RNA or DNA, the end result is that the cells of the jabbed individual produce spike protein and express that spike protein in their surface. The consequence?
The immune system of the jabbed now identifies previously healthy cells, now mounted with spike protein, as intruders and destroys them.
What if this occurs in the heart? The immune system attacks the cells of the heart, resulting in myocarditis or pericarditis.
Play this out in any part of the body, and it’s easy to understand how and why there are such a wide range of injuries. Couple this with the fact that the lipid nanoparticles can and do travel all throughout the body, even through the blood brain barrier, and it is blatantly obvious.
This is the message that needs to be communicated to the general public. The picture of plausibility needs to be painted before any of the data can be believed.
They need to understand HOW the wide range of injuries and the large number of deaths are possible. Explain how the products work and what they do in the body and the truth becomes undeniable.
This should be the focus moving forward. There is more than enough data to evidence the dangers of these products, but we’ve put the cart before the horse, and left the public in the dark. There is a general feeling that “something isn’t right” but the average person can’t see inside the black box in order to validate that feeling.
Explain the mechanism, through graphics and translation into lay terms, and the data driven evidence quickly becomes compelling to the masses.
Here we sit, engaging in debate over which of these products is more deadly, meanwhile thousands are dead, many more are irreversibly injured, and the general public has been gaslit into faith in science.
What’s the issue? Why isn’t this data compelling enough to cause outrage?
They simply have no idea what is being discussed. They don’t understand statistics, p-values, confidence intervals, or anything of the like.
Beyond that, and perhaps most relevant, they don’t understand HOW the jabs work. They do not live in a world where it is plausible that the jabs can cause injury. These products are a black box, believed to “reduce the risk of hospitalization and death” somehow. Does anyone know how they do it?
Mainstream experts do, but it’s too complicated to explain and they don’t have time. They are “safe and effective” and that’s all we need to now.
So what’s is your average person supposed to do with this data? It’s expert opinion vs expert opinion, and they do not have the tools to discern who is telling the truth. Safe and effective? Or useless and deadly?
The truth becomes obvious when the mechanism of action is understood.
Whether the product is modified RNA or DNA, the end result is that the cells of the jabbed individual produce spike protein and express that spike protein in their surface. The consequence?
The immune system of the jabbed now identifies previously healthy cells, now mounted with spike protein, as intruders and destroys them.
What if this occurs in the heart? The immune system attacks the cells of the heart, resulting in myocarditis or pericarditis.
Play this out in any part of the body, and it’s easy to understand how and why there are such a wide range of injuries. Couple this with the fact that the lipid nanoparticles can and do travel all throughout the body, even through the blood brain barrier, and it is blatantly obvious.
This is the message that needs to be communicated to the general public. The picture of plausibility needs to be painted before any of the data can be believed.
They need to understand HOW the wide range of injuries and the large number of deaths are possible. Explain how the products work and what they do in the body and the truth becomes undeniable.
This should be the focus moving forward. There is more than enough data to evidence the dangers of these products, but we’ve put the cart before the horse, and left the public in the dark. There is a general feeling that “something isn’t right” but the average person can’t see inside the black box in order to validate that feeling.
Explain the mechanism, through graphics and translation into lay terms, and the data driven evidence quickly becomes compelling to the masses.