Here are the 9 studies from Vaxxed-Unvaxxed, thanks to Brian Hooker. 100% show your kids are far better off avoiding all vaccines. Where's the science showing the opposite? Nowhere to be found!
Vax believers will still counter with their terror that the diseases from which they truly believe vaccines saved 50 million and counting people in the US will come back in full force if people stop vaccinating.
But the actual stats indicate vaccines had very little, if any, effect on death rates, and advancements such as nutritional awareness, sanitation, improved living and working conditions, and so forth, really eradicated some of these diseases, including typhoid and scarlet fever (among the deadliest, which had no vaccination programs), and rendered most other infectious diseases (such as measles) non-life threatening for people with healthy and well supported immune systems.
The death rates for the most deadly of those old diseases that remain, flu and pneumonia, have actually increased in since introduction of the vaccines, according to US government stats. Even when I was a vax believer, I figured flu shots wouldn't be very effective if one can get it again and again in different strains.
And poliomyelitis is evidently a poisoning condition, its rise and mid 20th century peak coinciding with use of agricultural pesticides, such as lead arsenate (lovely) in the late 19th century, and benzene hexachloride and DDT in the mid 20th century. I wonder how the rates of non-accident paralytic conditions compare in the vaccinated and unvaccinated? And how many carry active polio virus with no ill effects whatsoever?
The other poster child, smallpox, had its worst 19th century epidemic in Europe in 1872, when vaccination rates were the highest ever, and when it was eradicated in the early to mid 20th century in the UK, the ratio of vaccinations to live births was under 50%, so over half the people in crowded cities were unvaccinated. Public health improvements defanged the virus, unable to survive the stronger terrain. If it were to be released again, which for all I know, attempts may have been made to terrorize unvaccinated people into vaccinating, they have been or would be duds. Smallpox went the way of scarlet fever.
But deeply ingrained belief combined with irrational fear is a tough nut to crack. Gotta keep chipping away at the shell.
but what about the so-called "immunizing." non-specific, globulin that are supposed to react to the alleged "isolated virus" they are injecting into babies? Oh! wait, they don't see if globulin (antibodies) are created to the alleged "virus" - that's what "adjuvants" are there for. Are people now "immune" to "adjuvants" (toxic crap they use to make vaccines. Isn't then new definition of a vaccine - an injection containing antigens that create a globulin response. What if these globulin are COMPLETELY misunderstood, what if they don't create "immunity" to anything, what if they are there to help repair the body. Oops! am I sounding like a "Virus Denier" - gosh, as if anyone has proven they exist using the "cytopathic method" i.e. the cause cells to die via toxification and starvation, then take a picture and claim one has "isolated" the debris/"virus" - How about creating an algorithm that then becomes self-professing that computer sequences can have "meaning" attributed to them and new so-called "isolates"/"variants" can be MATCHED to. Gosh, why not pre-create an elaborate computer sequence and switch it with the computer sequence created from Patient 0 in Wuhan. No one will know if a PCR test is then used to do the matching/alignment later on, especially if it's set to 45x-35x cycles. Gosh! I'm also starting to sound like a "Conspiracy Theorist" .... I must not know what I'm talking about.
How about compromising children's detox pathways and then claim those who don't correctly detox are "immunized" - BUT if that doesn't work, then claim they "GOT" a "breakthrough infection" - even better, say it's the vaccine strain - use the genome sequence alignment trick, that will definitely make them continue to believe the illness was caused by an alleged "virus" ... Keep up the herding i.e. not other cause should be considered - never.
HAS ANY STUDY BEEN DONE TO SEE IF THIMEROSAL HAS NEGATIVE EFFECTS IN VACCINES AS A PRESERVATIVE?!?! EVEN THE EARLY VACCINATIONS ON CHILDREN COULD LEAD TO FUTURE PROBLEMS!!! THIS MERCURY-BASED PRESERVATIVE TELLS ME THIS COULD BE CAUSING MANY, MANY PROBLEMS!!!
Going into the weeds for that Joy Garner's unvaccinated study (including correspondence to clarify): ZERO cancer in the over 1,000 unvaccinated respondents.
Reading "Murder by Injection" pg 132 Dr. Clark. "cancer was unknown until compulsory vaccination with cowpox vaccine began to be introduced. I have since had to deal with over 200 cases of cancer. I never saw a case of cancer in an unvaccinated person"
Also pg 138: the swine flu vaccine killed all the pigs it was tested on - so they decided to use it on humans. Why throw away expensive potions at a loss when you can sell them for a profit?
For people who enjoy overwhelming numbers. Available in one recent compilation "Can You Catch A Cold? by Dan Roytas. 7 years of research.
203 studies testing the idea that disease can be transmitted. Outcome: ZERO proof of contagion. 2 Caveats. The nocebo effect is real! Rare instances of histamine in sneeze droplets transmitting mild symptoms.
ZERO studies proving that a particle resembling a "virus" has ever been extracted from a sick person or even a healthy person.
ZERO studies proving that bacteria cause disease. (Already in and on us, they congregate to eat dead tissue). Caveat is that a very sick person can have a burdensome infestation of bacteria for which the byproducts can be harmful.
Other helpful references "What Really Makes You lll" (10 years of research)
YouTube has recently said it is reinstating accounts that it says it should not have terminated because they did not actually violate YouTube policy. I've noticed that YouTube lately is not automatically hiding or deleting comments related to vaccine criticism. Would YouTube now allow the video Do Vaccines Make Us Healthier by Informed Consent Xpress, which is now on Rumble and elsewhere, to be put back up on YouTube?
Having a paper forcibly redacted, then having his pediatric licence revoked, for no good reason, validates the outcome as being "over the target" (Thomas and Weiler). At which point it's time to attack the target!
I am not clear on who is doing this. I am not clear on why those who are doing this are doing it. What is the story of the continual creeping growth of the vaccine industry?
At the paediatrician's office, vaccines keep the lights on and they have to pay for their years of med school indoctrination as drug dealers. And billions for Big Harma and their directors who serve as directors on each other's boards (big banks, insurers, chemicals, Ag, The Federal Reserve- see "Murder By Injection" for a snapshot from 1988, where he names names! A stinking incestuous, intermarried, $trillion cesspool. Also, via the revolving door, or a nod and a wink and/or carrots and sticks the government can only serve as a puppet. But there is a glimmer of hope now. I think RFK JR & substack hosts like Steve are very brave considering the risks.
says the results are acceptable but in reality, there was a 50% higher risk of death in babies given RSV vax vs. placebo group.
Just wanted to highlight this here in case you have the energy to do a similar curation of any actual placebo studies (which are typically lies as the "placebo" is actually another vax or at least aluminum - disgusting... but even if that was the case with this trial - which is likely - the vax was so devastating as to be far worse).
I'm with you guys, but: The main problem with these studies is that there done in the environment of where most people are vaxed so the population has not go thru getting all the childhood diseases and issues that can cause sometimes. Just saying.
Now that Bobby Kennedy jr has yanked $500M from further mRNA research, I think the lawsuits will start to stream in. Look at thegatewaypundit com which has an article where Steve Bannon interviews a senior HHS advisor. It is shocking but of course we have also known this for a long time.
It is now incumbent on us who are in the know , to trumpet this news from the rooftops to family, friends and anyone else willing to lend us an ear. Speaking for myself. ..for a couple of years I just kept my mouth shut since discussion on this topic became so toxic. Now its time to speak up again. The evidence ( that we've known about for years ) is now officially in. We were lucky enough to be on the cutting edge of this debacle and lots of us didnt get the jab because of that knowledge.You know the saying ..first they deny it, then they get angry, then they accept it as if it was self evident all the time.
Plenty are wondering the same thing, but that is privileged information for those who can afford it. Steve has decided that we need to upgrade to paid to find out. It kinda irks me when people decide that money is more important than getting information out to the general population.
I feel the same. We should all have access to truth without having to pay for it. Except Steve’s Substack is one of the few I am a paid subscriber. Us paid subscribers don’t have/get the Bobby insider information either sadly. Very frustrating. Why can’t we know the plan? We were RFK, Jr’s biggest supporters. I have lost hope at this point in believing the full truth will be out in the open to everyone. All feels like bait and switch and smoke and mirrors. I think only we the people can make a change by more and more speaking truth however we can & refusing all injections.
You're right about the truth being concealed to everyone, and there is an abundance of bait and switch, smoke and mirrors as well. I'm no authority of discerning the truth, but I do know that honest people cannot be deceived or cheated, and those who are closest to the truth are the most convincing liars. So when I see claims that the truth is hidden behind a paywall, I don't find these claims all that convincing. They're not very close to the truth. The truth is always self evident. I just have to get honest with myself. I always appreciate honesty and I appreciate your honesty.
Vax believers will still counter with their terror that the diseases from which they truly believe vaccines saved 50 million and counting people in the US will come back in full force if people stop vaccinating.
But the actual stats indicate vaccines had very little, if any, effect on death rates, and advancements such as nutritional awareness, sanitation, improved living and working conditions, and so forth, really eradicated some of these diseases, including typhoid and scarlet fever (among the deadliest, which had no vaccination programs), and rendered most other infectious diseases (such as measles) non-life threatening for people with healthy and well supported immune systems.
The death rates for the most deadly of those old diseases that remain, flu and pneumonia, have actually increased in since introduction of the vaccines, according to US government stats. Even when I was a vax believer, I figured flu shots wouldn't be very effective if one can get it again and again in different strains.
And poliomyelitis is evidently a poisoning condition, its rise and mid 20th century peak coinciding with use of agricultural pesticides, such as lead arsenate (lovely) in the late 19th century, and benzene hexachloride and DDT in the mid 20th century. I wonder how the rates of non-accident paralytic conditions compare in the vaccinated and unvaccinated? And how many carry active polio virus with no ill effects whatsoever?
The other poster child, smallpox, had its worst 19th century epidemic in Europe in 1872, when vaccination rates were the highest ever, and when it was eradicated in the early to mid 20th century in the UK, the ratio of vaccinations to live births was under 50%, so over half the people in crowded cities were unvaccinated. Public health improvements defanged the virus, unable to survive the stronger terrain. If it were to be released again, which for all I know, attempts may have been made to terrorize unvaccinated people into vaccinating, they have been or would be duds. Smallpox went the way of scarlet fever.
But deeply ingrained belief combined with irrational fear is a tough nut to crack. Gotta keep chipping away at the shell.
but what about the so-called "immunizing." non-specific, globulin that are supposed to react to the alleged "isolated virus" they are injecting into babies? Oh! wait, they don't see if globulin (antibodies) are created to the alleged "virus" - that's what "adjuvants" are there for. Are people now "immune" to "adjuvants" (toxic crap they use to make vaccines. Isn't then new definition of a vaccine - an injection containing antigens that create a globulin response. What if these globulin are COMPLETELY misunderstood, what if they don't create "immunity" to anything, what if they are there to help repair the body. Oops! am I sounding like a "Virus Denier" - gosh, as if anyone has proven they exist using the "cytopathic method" i.e. the cause cells to die via toxification and starvation, then take a picture and claim one has "isolated" the debris/"virus" - How about creating an algorithm that then becomes self-professing that computer sequences can have "meaning" attributed to them and new so-called "isolates"/"variants" can be MATCHED to. Gosh, why not pre-create an elaborate computer sequence and switch it with the computer sequence created from Patient 0 in Wuhan. No one will know if a PCR test is then used to do the matching/alignment later on, especially if it's set to 45x-35x cycles. Gosh! I'm also starting to sound like a "Conspiracy Theorist" .... I must not know what I'm talking about.
How about compromising children's detox pathways and then claim those who don't correctly detox are "immunized" - BUT if that doesn't work, then claim they "GOT" a "breakthrough infection" - even better, say it's the vaccine strain - use the genome sequence alignment trick, that will definitely make them continue to believe the illness was caused by an alleged "virus" ... Keep up the herding i.e. not other cause should be considered - never.
Thank you for this extensive work.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7709050/
HAS ANY STUDY BEEN DONE TO SEE IF THIMEROSAL HAS NEGATIVE EFFECTS IN VACCINES AS A PRESERVATIVE?!?! EVEN THE EARLY VACCINATIONS ON CHILDREN COULD LEAD TO FUTURE PROBLEMS!!! THIS MERCURY-BASED PRESERVATIVE TELLS ME THIS COULD BE CAUSING MANY, MANY PROBLEMS!!!
Going into the weeds for that Joy Garner's unvaccinated study (including correspondence to clarify): ZERO cancer in the over 1,000 unvaccinated respondents.
Reading "Murder by Injection" pg 132 Dr. Clark. "cancer was unknown until compulsory vaccination with cowpox vaccine began to be introduced. I have since had to deal with over 200 cases of cancer. I never saw a case of cancer in an unvaccinated person"
Also pg 138: the swine flu vaccine killed all the pigs it was tested on - so they decided to use it on humans. Why throw away expensive potions at a loss when you can sell them for a profit?
For people who enjoy overwhelming numbers. Available in one recent compilation "Can You Catch A Cold? by Dan Roytas. 7 years of research.
203 studies testing the idea that disease can be transmitted. Outcome: ZERO proof of contagion. 2 Caveats. The nocebo effect is real! Rare instances of histamine in sneeze droplets transmitting mild symptoms.
ZERO studies proving that a particle resembling a "virus" has ever been extracted from a sick person or even a healthy person.
ZERO studies proving that bacteria cause disease. (Already in and on us, they congregate to eat dead tissue). Caveat is that a very sick person can have a burdensome infestation of bacteria for which the byproducts can be harmful.
Other helpful references "What Really Makes You lll" (10 years of research)
"Virus Mania" 3rd Ed.
Thanks for this compilation!
YouTube has recently said it is reinstating accounts that it says it should not have terminated because they did not actually violate YouTube policy. I've noticed that YouTube lately is not automatically hiding or deleting comments related to vaccine criticism. Would YouTube now allow the video Do Vaccines Make Us Healthier by Informed Consent Xpress, which is now on Rumble and elsewhere, to be put back up on YouTube?
Not that it invalidates the studies, but although there are 10 studies comparing vaxed and unvaxed, there are only five authors among them.
Having a paper forcibly redacted, then having his pediatric licence revoked, for no good reason, validates the outcome as being "over the target" (Thomas and Weiler). At which point it's time to attack the target!
Bombs away.
I am not clear on who is doing this. I am not clear on why those who are doing this are doing it. What is the story of the continual creeping growth of the vaccine industry?
At the paediatrician's office, vaccines keep the lights on and they have to pay for their years of med school indoctrination as drug dealers. And billions for Big Harma and their directors who serve as directors on each other's boards (big banks, insurers, chemicals, Ag, The Federal Reserve- see "Murder By Injection" for a snapshot from 1988, where he names names! A stinking incestuous, intermarried, $trillion cesspool. Also, via the revolving door, or a nod and a wink and/or carrots and sticks the government can only serve as a puppet. But there is a glimmer of hope now. I think RFK JR & substack hosts like Steve are very brave considering the risks.
Amazing. Because there are so few vax/unvax studies, your summary is greatly appreciated and so valuable.
It got me thinking that we have a similar issue with intervention/placebo studies, and so I noticed this one, for example.
Babies Who Received the RSV Shot Were Three Times More Likely to Suffer Severe Neurological Damage Compared to Placebo
https://birdseyeviewperspective.substack.com/p/babies-who-received-the-rsv-shot
In that post, I highlighted what Dr. Mercola points out here
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2025/07/17/merck-rsv-shot-risks-for-babies.aspx?
that the Merck trial here
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04767373.
says the results are acceptable but in reality, there was a 50% higher risk of death in babies given RSV vax vs. placebo group.
Just wanted to highlight this here in case you have the energy to do a similar curation of any actual placebo studies (which are typically lies as the "placebo" is actually another vax or at least aluminum - disgusting... but even if that was the case with this trial - which is likely - the vax was so devastating as to be far worse).
Beyond valuable, thank you deeply for your service. I've added this to a curation of research and evidence of harm from vaccines as a whole:
https://birdseyeviewperspective.substack.com/p/vaccines-part-2-evidence-and-research
Reports by vaccine type here:
https://birdseyeviewperspective.substack.com/p/vaccines-part-4-reports-by-vaccine
Someone should share this with the Senator Doctor from Louisiana. Of course he wouldn't read it. Don't dare offend his handles - "Big Pharma".
Now that these side effects are indisputable, how can this crap be offered ?
I'm with you guys, but: The main problem with these studies is that there done in the environment of where most people are vaxed so the population has not go thru getting all the childhood diseases and issues that can cause sometimes. Just saying.
Now that Bobby Kennedy jr has yanked $500M from further mRNA research, I think the lawsuits will start to stream in. Look at thegatewaypundit com which has an article where Steve Bannon interviews a senior HHS advisor. It is shocking but of course we have also known this for a long time.
So, I’m wondering why has the Con-vid shots not yet been pulled off market if they are now finally admitting mRNA is bad for Con-vid and flu. ???
It is now incumbent on us who are in the know , to trumpet this news from the rooftops to family, friends and anyone else willing to lend us an ear. Speaking for myself. ..for a couple of years I just kept my mouth shut since discussion on this topic became so toxic. Now its time to speak up again. The evidence ( that we've known about for years ) is now officially in. We were lucky enough to be on the cutting edge of this debacle and lots of us didnt get the jab because of that knowledge.You know the saying ..first they deny it, then they get angry, then they accept it as if it was self evident all the time.
Plenty are wondering the same thing, but that is privileged information for those who can afford it. Steve has decided that we need to upgrade to paid to find out. It kinda irks me when people decide that money is more important than getting information out to the general population.
I feel the same. We should all have access to truth without having to pay for it. Except Steve’s Substack is one of the few I am a paid subscriber. Us paid subscribers don’t have/get the Bobby insider information either sadly. Very frustrating. Why can’t we know the plan? We were RFK, Jr’s biggest supporters. I have lost hope at this point in believing the full truth will be out in the open to everyone. All feels like bait and switch and smoke and mirrors. I think only we the people can make a change by more and more speaking truth however we can & refusing all injections.
You're right about the truth being concealed to everyone, and there is an abundance of bait and switch, smoke and mirrors as well. I'm no authority of discerning the truth, but I do know that honest people cannot be deceived or cheated, and those who are closest to the truth are the most convincing liars. So when I see claims that the truth is hidden behind a paywall, I don't find these claims all that convincing. They're not very close to the truth. The truth is always self evident. I just have to get honest with myself. I always appreciate honesty and I appreciate your honesty.
Ah… so basically he is still gathering irrefutable evidence. No timing revealed.