118 Comments
User's avatar
LMB's avatar

HAS ANY STUDY BEEN DONE TO SEE IF THIMEROSAL HAS NEGATIVE EFFECTS IN VACCINES AS A PRESERVATIVE?!?! EVEN THE EARLY VACCINATIONS ON CHILDREN COULD LEAD TO FUTURE PROBLEMS!!! THIS MERCURY-BASED PRESERVATIVE TELLS ME THIS COULD BE CAUSING MANY, MANY PROBLEMS!!!

Expand full comment
DDR Dave's avatar

Going into the weeds for that Joy Garner's unvaccinated study (including correspondence to clarify): ZERO cancer in the over 1,000 unvaccinated respondents.

Reading "Murder by Injection" pg 132 Dr. Clark. "cancer was unknown until compulsory vaccination with cowpox vaccine began to be introduced. I have since had to deal with over 200 cases of cancer. I never saw a case of cancer in an unvaccinated person"

Also pg 138: the swine flu vaccine killed all the pigs it was tested on - so they decided to use it on humans. Why throw away expensive potions at a loss when you can sell them for a profit?

Expand full comment
DDR Dave's avatar

For people who enjoy overwhelming numbers. Available in one recent compilation "Can You Catch A Cold? by Dan Roytas. 7 years of research.

203 studies testing the idea that disease can be transmitted. Outcome: ZERO proof of contagion. 2 Caveats. The nocebo effect is real! Rare instances of histamine in sneeze droplets transmitting mild symptoms.

ZERO studies proving that a particle resembling a "virus" has ever been extracted from a sick person or even a healthy person.

ZERO studies proving that bacteria cause disease. (Already in and on us, they congregate to eat dead tissue). Caveat is that a very sick person can have a burdensome infestation of bacteria for which the byproducts can be harmful.

Other helpful references "What Really Makes You lll" (10 years of research)

"Virus Mania" 3rd Ed.

Thanks for this compilation!

Expand full comment
Talknet's avatar

Let’s take it to the next level, now!

10 Reasons Viruses Don't Exist

https://talknet.substack.com/p/10-reasons-viruses-dont-exist

Expand full comment
Clark's avatar

YouTube has recently said it is reinstating accounts that it says it should not have terminated because they did not actually violate YouTube policy. I've noticed that YouTube lately is not automatically hiding or deleting comments related to vaccine criticism. Would YouTube now allow the video Do Vaccines Make Us Healthier by Informed Consent Xpress, which is now on Rumble and elsewhere, to be put back up on YouTube?

Expand full comment
Clark's avatar

Not that it invalidates the studies, but although there are 10 studies comparing vaxed and unvaxed, there are only five authors among them.

Expand full comment
DDR Dave's avatar

Having a paper forcibly redacted, then having his pediatric licence revoked, for no good reason, validates the outcome as being "over the target" (Thomas and Weiler). At which point it's time to attack the target!

Expand full comment
Clark's avatar

Bombs away.

Expand full comment
jacob silverman's avatar

I am not clear on who is doing this. I am not clear on why those who are doing this are doing it. What is the story of the continual creeping growth of the vaccine industry?

Expand full comment
DDR Dave's avatar

At the paediatrician's office, vaccines keep the lights on and they have to pay for their years of med school indoctrination as drug dealers. And billions for Big Harma and their directors who serve as directors on each other's boards (big banks, insurers, chemicals, Ag, The Federal Reserve- see "Murder By Injection" for a snapshot from 1988, where he names names! A stinking incestuous, intermarried, $trillion cesspool. Also, via the revolving door, or a nod and a wink and/or carrots and sticks the government can only serve as a puppet. But there is a glimmer of hope now. I think RFK JR & substack hosts like Steve are very brave considering the risks.

Expand full comment
Shelly Thorn's avatar

Amazing. Because there are so few vax/unvax studies, your summary is greatly appreciated and so valuable.

It got me thinking that we have a similar issue with intervention/placebo studies, and so I noticed this one, for example.

Babies Who Received the RSV Shot Were Three Times More Likely to Suffer Severe Neurological Damage Compared to Placebo

https://birdseyeviewperspective.substack.com/p/babies-who-received-the-rsv-shot

In that post, I highlighted what Dr. Mercola points out here

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2025/07/17/merck-rsv-shot-risks-for-babies.aspx?

that the Merck trial here

https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04767373.

says the results are acceptable but in reality, there was a 50% higher risk of death in babies given RSV vax vs. placebo group.

Just wanted to highlight this here in case you have the energy to do a similar curation of any actual placebo studies (which are typically lies as the "placebo" is actually another vax or at least aluminum - disgusting... but even if that was the case with this trial - which is likely - the vax was so devastating as to be far worse).

Expand full comment
Shelly Thorn's avatar

Beyond valuable, thank you deeply for your service. I've added this to a curation of research and evidence of harm from vaccines as a whole:

https://birdseyeviewperspective.substack.com/p/vaccines-part-2-evidence-and-research

Reports by vaccine type here:

https://birdseyeviewperspective.substack.com/p/vaccines-part-4-reports-by-vaccine

Expand full comment
pepperspapa's avatar

Someone should share this with the Senator Doctor from Louisiana. Of course he wouldn't read it. Don't dare offend his handles - "Big Pharma".

Expand full comment
norica's avatar

Now that these side effects are indisputable, how can this crap be offered ?

Expand full comment
Frank Parker's avatar

I'm with you guys, but: The main problem with these studies is that there done in the environment of where most people are vaxed so the population has not go thru getting all the childhood diseases and issues that can cause sometimes. Just saying.

Expand full comment
Joe's avatar

Now that Bobby Kennedy jr has yanked $500M from further mRNA research, I think the lawsuits will start to stream in. Look at thegatewaypundit com which has an article where Steve Bannon interviews a senior HHS advisor. It is shocking but of course we have also known this for a long time.

Expand full comment
Gabriella's avatar

So, I’m wondering why has the Con-vid shots not yet been pulled off market if they are now finally admitting mRNA is bad for Con-vid and flu. ???

Expand full comment
Joe's avatar

It is now incumbent on us who are in the know , to trumpet this news from the rooftops to family, friends and anyone else willing to lend us an ear. Speaking for myself. ..for a couple of years I just kept my mouth shut since discussion on this topic became so toxic. Now its time to speak up again. The evidence ( that we've known about for years ) is now officially in. We were lucky enough to be on the cutting edge of this debacle and lots of us didnt get the jab because of that knowledge.You know the saying ..first they deny it, then they get angry, then they accept it as if it was self evident all the time.

Expand full comment
Shnarkle Von Barkle's avatar

Plenty are wondering the same thing, but that is privileged information for those who can afford it. Steve has decided that we need to upgrade to paid to find out. It kinda irks me when people decide that money is more important than getting information out to the general population.

Expand full comment
Gabriella's avatar

I feel the same. We should all have access to truth without having to pay for it. Except Steve’s Substack is one of the few I am a paid subscriber. Us paid subscribers don’t have/get the Bobby insider information either sadly. Very frustrating. Why can’t we know the plan? We were RFK, Jr’s biggest supporters. I have lost hope at this point in believing the full truth will be out in the open to everyone. All feels like bait and switch and smoke and mirrors. I think only we the people can make a change by more and more speaking truth however we can & refusing all injections.

Expand full comment
Shnarkle Von Barkle's avatar

You're right about the truth being concealed to everyone, and there is an abundance of bait and switch, smoke and mirrors as well. I'm no authority of discerning the truth, but I do know that honest people cannot be deceived or cheated, and those who are closest to the truth are the most convincing liars. So when I see claims that the truth is hidden behind a paywall, I don't find these claims all that convincing. They're not very close to the truth. The truth is always self evident. I just have to get honest with myself. I always appreciate honesty and I appreciate your honesty.

Expand full comment
Gabriella's avatar

Ah… so basically he is still gathering irrefutable evidence. No timing revealed.

Expand full comment
Bob Patterson's avatar

Steve thanks! Wish the mainstream media would be as brave to tell the truth!!

Expand full comment
Joe's avatar

The MSM with the gov and vaccine manufacturers dont dare breath a word because all of them were in on this. They hope they can ignore it into oblivion.

Expand full comment
Pat O's avatar

Check out our updated video, "Do vaccines make us healthier?" posted on Dr. McCullough's substack (and our NICEIdeas.substack.com) for a more visceral presentation of some of these vax-unvax results:

https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/do-vaccines-make-us-healthier?utm_campaign=548354&utm_source=cross-post&r=u4z3&utm_medium=email

Expand full comment
Yovan's avatar

Can’t open the Joy Garner artcicles. Any other links to them? 🙏

Expand full comment
WayneBGood's avatar

The links are fixed in the article now.

Expand full comment