
3 studies show definitively that the influenza vaccines don't work
But the press still thinks it does. There are record flu deaths in California this year, but they never report on the vaccination status of the people who died. Why not?

Executive summary
We’ve known for over 20 years now that flu vaccines don’t work.
So why is the CDC and mainstream media still promoting them?
It’s been confirmed in two other studies since then, one that explicitly used a different method and found exactly the same thing and one paper that accidentally exposed the fraud (they only realized it after I pointed it out).
Still no change.
The 2005 CDC study
I first heard about this study on X:
The video in that post is awesome. Take 3 minutes and watch it.
Sharyl Attkisson, one of the few mainstream journalists willing to challenge pharmaceutical narratives, reported on a groundbreaking NIH-funded study that fundamentally contradicted the established narrative on flu vaccine effectiveness.
A pivotal moment in the history of flu vaccine scrutiny.
The paper in question was:
"Impact of Influenza Vaccination on Seasonal Mortality in the US Elderly Population" by Lone Simonsen et al., published in the Archives of Internal Medicine (now JAMA Internal Medicine) in February 2005.
This study was absolutely devastating to the flu vaccine narrative because:
It examined three decades of data (1968-2001)
It found no decrease in mortality among the elderly despite vaccination rates increasing from 15% to 65%
It was conducted by researchers from the National Institutes of Health itself
It concluded that observational studies had "substantially overestimated" vaccine benefits
The most damning conclusion stated: "We could not correlate increasing vaccination coverage after 1980 with declining mortality rates in any age group."
In other words, the flu vaccine doesn’t work.
Attkisson's January 2006 CBS report brought this study to public attention, highlighting how it contradicted the CDC's continued claims of 50-70% mortality reduction.
Her reporting represented a rare moment of mainstream media challenging the pharmaceutical establishment.
What happened next is equally telling:
The study was largely ignored by public health officials
No major policy changes resulted despite the significance of the findings
The aggressive flu vaccine campaigns continued unabated
Attkisson faced increasing resistance to her investigative reporting on vaccines
This episode exemplified how even the highest quality evidence is systematically sidelined when it contradicts established pharmaceutical interests and institutional positions. The fact that this study came from within the NIH itself makes its subsequent burial all the more revealing about how science is selectively promoted or suppressed.
The UK study: The Anderson discontinuity study
I found this one myself. The Anderson 2020 discontinuity study.
Results: The data included 170 million episodes of care and 7.6 million deaths. Turning 65 was associated with a statistically and clinically significant increase in rate of seasonal influenza vaccination. However, no evidence indicated that vaccination reduced hospitalizations or mortality among elderly persons. The estimates were precise enough to rule out results from many previous studies.
They used a clever method. There is a step discontinuity in flu vaccination uptake when people turn 65 in the UK due to NHS benefits. Yet there was NO step discontinuity of flu deaths.
So it confirmed the NIH study: the shots didn’t work.
The VA study showed flu vs. COVID hospitalizations weren’t changed by vaccination status (neither vaccine worked)
Most recently, Xie et al. looked at the VA data.
Risk of Death in Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19 vs Seasonal Influenza in Fall-Winter 2022-2023
If you examine the Table, you’ll see the same % got hospitalized for the flu as for COVID. See the red box.
But wait… if the flu vaccine worked, the % of the public getting hospitalized for flu should be way under the background % rate of all people vaccinated for the flu (which is estimated pretty well by the % of people vaccinated for the flu who got COVID).
So the influenza vaccine didn’t protect you at all from getting hospitalized for the flu.
Another confirmation!
Three studies all published in the peer reviewed scientific literature showing the flu vaccines don’t work
… and it doesn’t make a difference.
This is insane.
Speaking of infectious disease…
I cut about 5 days off of the cold I just had using a method that I recently discovered and refined as I used it.
It’s been validated by Dr. Pierre Kory and Paul Marik. It might even save your life. Kory used a variant of it and it kept him out of the hospital.
It’s remarkably easy to do and once you acquire the stuff you need, it costs virtually nothing. I have never in my life had a cold disappear this fast. It was unbelievable. Check it out here. You’ll be very impressed.
Summary
When is the mainstream media and CDC going to start telling the truth about vaccines?
Today, not a single mainstream journalist will dare tell the truth about the influenza vaccines that has been obvious for 20 years. Not one.
They have been talking about this in Canada since 2015, oddly they called it the Canadian Problem.
2015 article in CBC news (article with video of officials admitting repeated annual flue vaccinations reduces effectiveness)
Flu vaccine paradox adds to public health debate 'Canadian problem' an example of odd effects of prior vaccination
People who receive flu vaccines year after year can sometimes show reduced protection, an effect that Canadian infectious disease specialists say muddies public health messages for annual flu vaccine campaigns....
https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/flu-vaccine-paradox-adds-to-public-health-debate-1.2912790
Related academic article:
https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/59/10/1375/2895694?sid=ab7f35bd-8baa-454e-ba1b-d93b7d1801cc
2016 CTV news, repeat of the above problem
'Serial' flu shots may limit body's ability to fight virus in future: researchers
By Daniel Otis Published: November 05, 2016
Although doctors maintain that flu shots are life-savers that everyone should receive, some researchers are uncovering hints that "serial vaccination" -- that is, consistently receiving annual flu shots -- may in fact limit one's ability to fight the virus in the future.
https://www.ctvnews.ca/health/article/serial-flu-shots-may-limit-bodys-ability-to-fight-virus-in-future-researchers/
2025 Feb - Cleveland clinic author -- still preprint but will likely be peer reviewed soon as this author got all covid-19 studies peer reviewed. This is the author of the original Covid-19 Cleveland Clinic Studies that showed the more covid-19 shots you got the more likely you were to test positive for Covid-19 has now done a similar study in the Cleveland Clinic re effectiveness of influenza shot.
2025 April -- Effectiveness of the Influenza Vaccine During the 2024-2025 Respiratory Viral Season
Study included 53,400 employees at Cleveland Clinic
".. over the course of the study the cumulative incidence of influenza increased more rapidly among the vaccinated than the unvaccinated..."
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.01.30.25321421v3
Lastly Bonnie Henry the Provindial Health officer of BC publishes data that defeats the covid-19 narrative that shows no serious pandemic in 2020 but reduce life expectancy in 2021 and 2022 vs prepandemic (i.e. increased all cause mortality only after vaccine roll-out) plus higher covid-19 deaths in 2021 after the vaccines than in 2020.
More specifics and link to Bonnie Henry co-authored Statistics Canada Article:
April 2025
BC Provincial Health Officer publishes data that shows vaccines increased death rates (both all-cause mortality and covid-19 deaths). Date of report February 2025 for Statistics Canada.
Bonnie Henry, Provincial Health Officer for British Columbia Canada was co-author of this paper and the tables she presented in the scientific paper essentially prove a) the pandemic was not high risk even for female since Table 2, page 8 shows life expectancy unchanged (males were tainted by drug o/d deaths so not good to measure for covid-19); and b) covid-19 deaths for senior females aged 60-69 pre-vaccine were 5 per 100,000 and after the vaccine in 2021 the death rate increase 5-fold to 25 per 100,000 and further after the booster in 2022 to 29 per 100,000, see her Table 1 on page 7. Ironically the report doesn't comment on these facts that the date clearly reveals. Please read for yourself at link below and make your own conclusions, but to me this clearly sheds doubt on the entire covid-19 narrative and vaccine narrative.
Changes in life expectancy at birth during the COVID-19 pandemic and contributions by cause of death in British Columbia, Canada
https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/pub/82-003-x/2025002/article/00001-eng.pdf?st=PkbwEIaV
BC Provincial Health Officer publishes data that shows vaccines increased death rates (both all-cause mortality and covid-19 deaths). Date of report February 2025 for Statistics Canada.
(not flu related but is current news that deserves highlighting)
Bonnie Henry, Provincial Health Officer for British Columbia Canada was co-author of this paper and the tables she presented in the scientific paper essentially prove a) the pandemic was not high risk even for female since Table 2, page 8 shows life expectancy unchanged (males were tainted by drug o/d deaths so not good to measure for covid-19); and b) covid-19 deaths for senior females aged 60-69 pre-vaccine were 5 per 100,000 and after the vaccine in 2021 the death rate increase 5-fold to 25 per 100,000 and further after the booster in 2022 to 29 per 100,000, see her Table 1 on page 7. Ironically the report doesn't comment on these facts that the date clearly reveals. Please read for yourself at link below and make your own conclusions, but to me this clearly sheds doubt on the entire covid-19 narrative and vaccine narrative.
Changes in life expectancy at birth during the COVID-19 pandemic and contributions by cause of death in British Columbia, Canada
https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/pub/82-003-x/2025002/article/00001-eng.pdf?st=PkbwEIaV