Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Eddie's avatar

They have been talking about this in Canada since 2015, oddly they called it the Canadian Problem.

2015 article in CBC news (article with video of officials admitting repeated annual flue vaccinations reduces effectiveness)

Flu vaccine paradox adds to public health debate 'Canadian problem' an example of odd effects of prior vaccination

People who receive flu vaccines year after year can sometimes show reduced protection, an effect that Canadian infectious disease specialists say muddies public health messages for annual flu vaccine campaigns....

https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/flu-vaccine-paradox-adds-to-public-health-debate-1.2912790

Related academic article:

https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/59/10/1375/2895694?sid=ab7f35bd-8baa-454e-ba1b-d93b7d1801cc

2016 CTV news, repeat of the above problem

'Serial' flu shots may limit body's ability to fight virus in future: researchers

By Daniel Otis Published: November 05, 2016

Although doctors maintain that flu shots are life-savers that everyone should receive, some researchers are uncovering hints that "serial vaccination" -- that is, consistently receiving annual flu shots -- may in fact limit one's ability to fight the virus in the future.

https://www.ctvnews.ca/health/article/serial-flu-shots-may-limit-bodys-ability-to-fight-virus-in-future-researchers/

2025 Feb - Cleveland clinic author -- still preprint but will likely be peer reviewed soon as this author got all covid-19 studies peer reviewed. This is the author of the original Covid-19 Cleveland Clinic Studies that showed the more covid-19 shots you got the more likely you were to test positive for Covid-19 has now done a similar study in the Cleveland Clinic re effectiveness of influenza shot.

2025 April -- Effectiveness of the Influenza Vaccine During the 2024-2025 Respiratory Viral Season

Study included 53,400 employees at Cleveland Clinic

".. over the course of the study the cumulative incidence of influenza increased more rapidly among the vaccinated than the unvaccinated..."

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.01.30.25321421v3

Lastly Bonnie Henry the Provindial Health officer of BC publishes data that defeats the covid-19 narrative that shows no serious pandemic in 2020 but reduce life expectancy in 2021 and 2022 vs prepandemic (i.e. increased all cause mortality only after vaccine roll-out) plus higher covid-19 deaths in 2021 after the vaccines than in 2020.

More specifics and link to Bonnie Henry co-authored Statistics Canada Article:

April 2025

BC Provincial Health Officer publishes data that shows vaccines increased death rates (both all-cause mortality and covid-19 deaths). Date of report February 2025 for Statistics Canada.

Bonnie Henry, Provincial Health Officer for British Columbia Canada was co-author of this paper and the tables she presented in the scientific paper essentially prove a) the pandemic was not high risk even for female since Table 2, page 8 shows life expectancy unchanged (males were tainted by drug o/d deaths so not good to measure for covid-19); and b) covid-19 deaths for senior females aged 60-69 pre-vaccine were 5 per 100,000 and after the vaccine in 2021 the death rate increase 5-fold to 25 per 100,000 and further after the booster in 2022 to 29 per 100,000, see her Table 1 on page 7. Ironically the report doesn't comment on these facts that the date clearly reveals. Please read for yourself at link below and make your own conclusions, but to me this clearly sheds doubt on the entire covid-19 narrative and vaccine narrative.

Changes in life expectancy at birth during the COVID-19 pandemic and contributions by cause of death in British Columbia, Canada

https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/pub/82-003-x/2025002/article/00001-eng.pdf?st=PkbwEIaV

Expand full comment
Eddie's avatar

BC Provincial Health Officer publishes data that shows vaccines increased death rates (both all-cause mortality and covid-19 deaths). Date of report February 2025 for Statistics Canada.

(not flu related but is current news that deserves highlighting)

Bonnie Henry, Provincial Health Officer for British Columbia Canada was co-author of this paper and the tables she presented in the scientific paper essentially prove a) the pandemic was not high risk even for female since Table 2, page 8 shows life expectancy unchanged (males were tainted by drug o/d deaths so not good to measure for covid-19); and b) covid-19 deaths for senior females aged 60-69 pre-vaccine were 5 per 100,000 and after the vaccine in 2021 the death rate increase 5-fold to 25 per 100,000 and further after the booster in 2022 to 29 per 100,000, see her Table 1 on page 7. Ironically the report doesn't comment on these facts that the date clearly reveals. Please read for yourself at link below and make your own conclusions, but to me this clearly sheds doubt on the entire covid-19 narrative and vaccine narrative.

Changes in life expectancy at birth during the COVID-19 pandemic and contributions by cause of death in British Columbia, Canada

https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/pub/82-003-x/2025002/article/00001-eng.pdf?st=PkbwEIaV

Expand full comment
105 more comments...

No posts