Any US epidemiologist or infectious disease specialist with an h-index >=10, who thinks I got it wrong on the mRNA COVID vaccine risk/benefit analysis, can win $100K. No fee to enter.
I just emailed you. PERFECT! Sander Greenland actually suggested him as a judge for my vaccine debate. He's also been on CNN, and has a respectable h-index. And he's very articulate.
Sign me up to verify that you are correct. I’ll provide information that there is a universal panacea that will prevent all infectious diseases, organically. Vaccines are dangerous and unnecessary if you disinfect your body daily with ozone water.
Hi Ricky. The debate has nothing whatsoever to do with virus. It has to do with death. Deaths actually been proven to exist. Do you agree? Also, please explain how a $100,000 giveaway makes money for me. I really wanna know that one.
Steve, thanks many times over for all that you do, have done, to expose the vaccine lies. Thanks to you, Brett Weinstein and Dr. Malone for getting the 'cat outta the bag' on Brett's Dark Horse podcast and weathering hurricane of BS it ignited. ❤️❤️
Could you please provide your proof that I haven’t been paid anything by the government and so if you’re right, want to get the money that I’m entitled to. Please post your evidence here.
These guys are getting paid by big pharma so dont know how much they earn to lie but big pharma may have its say by offering more.Also they would debate a super knowledgeable person when their info is built on total bs,so they could not win the debate.You might find no takers...dont be surprised....
A man after my own heart. I used to beibe people just to read data on certain topics. I would give them the cash and then say "all you have to do, to be able to keep that cash, is to read this information and then tell me that it's crazy. Even if you are lying, yoh can keep the money. You just have to be willing to say those words, whether you believe them or not". Most would not take me up on the offer - which exposed their desire to stay blue-pilled and naive. But of the ones that did take me up on the offer, none lied to keep the money. Now, they were friends and such, so that likely changed things. But Steve has always impressed me with his willingness to put his money where his mouth is. One of the only people i know of. I'd take a bullet for this guy.
Good luck with the generous offer and trying to draw any of these greedy sycophants out but the pharmaceutical companies have even deeper pockets and how many have a conscience?
Geeze Louise!! You already know there is corporate science or vaccinology as a pseudoscience versus those without blinders on who study and report on actual science.
Instead of using California-flair money and drama, why not consider inviting Nic Hulcher from the McCullough foundation for an interview to pick his brains?? You could include an opposite view to the sanitized version from last night; topics like: rouleau blood formations, white clots, teenage heart damage, kidney damage, brain damage, turbo cancers, placental transfer to infants, mothers dying from cancers within a year of giving birth, serious drop in birth rates in highly vaxxed nations. Nic has been reporting in detail on a wide variety of dastardly side effects for the past 2 plus years despite most being swept under the carpet, few acknowledge the insane amount of damage caused by these shots.
The corporate and govt types have incomes and careers at stake, same as what happened to Del’s “Inconvenient Study”. Damn near impossible task to crack that wall. Look for another way to walk around instead of repeatedly beating head into impenetrable wall.
So maybe tune the dollar amount to match an hourly rate that comps them for time and travel. Set requirements for entry to be a proper h-index level. If Offit/Fauci/Hotez want to come and say nothing to all your challenges...maybe think of this as an opportunity to film them while you are asking the tough questions.
I'm just thinking of a way for you to remove any excuse not to show up, while not incentivizing EVERYONE to apply.
Not true what you just said, Steve. "Everyone" could not apply because you significantly limited the number of people who could apply and qualify for the debate by stating that the person needed an h-index >=10. What I recommend is that you do something similar to what Mr. Pare suggested, which is to offer $5,000 for the FIRST PERSON who has an h-index >=10 who agrees to debate you. That way you are out only $5,000, and not more than that because that will be the only debate that will be held on the topic. At least you will finally have a debate with someone, and you can boast afterwards how badly you beat the guy, how poorly he knew the pertinent science, etc.
Good news is, you'll have it all on film. Maybe: think of this as you making a movie, and you are paying a "bad guy actor" to play his role. The more pathetically they play the role, the worse it will look. And it really won't cost you much at all.
You could limit it to Fauci, Offit, and Hotez. $5k expenses (conditional on performance requirements), and $100k if they win.
Reply to this pinned comment ONLY if you are accepting and you qualify.
Dr Amesh Adalja emailed you about this when you were offering $50k but he didn’t get a response. He is still willing…I can connect you.
Megan@dweezilzappa.com
I just emailed you. PERFECT! Sander Greenland actually suggested him as a judge for my vaccine debate. He's also been on CNN, and has a respectable h-index. And he's very articulate.
Sign me up to verify that you are correct. I’ll provide information that there is a universal panacea that will prevent all infectious diseases, organically. Vaccines are dangerous and unnecessary if you disinfect your body daily with ozone water.
No takers?
Viruses have never been proven to exist. Why debate COVID shots when you can debate all "viral" shots? Ah, yes...that's right. You have money to make.
Hi Ricky. The debate has nothing whatsoever to do with virus. It has to do with death. Deaths actually been proven to exist. Do you agree? Also, please explain how a $100,000 giveaway makes money for me. I really wanna know that one.
Steve, thanks many times over for all that you do, have done, to expose the vaccine lies. Thanks to you, Brett Weinstein and Dr. Malone for getting the 'cat outta the bag' on Brett's Dark Horse podcast and weathering hurricane of BS it ignited. ❤️❤️
These people are all part of the narrative management. Malone has been an insider for decades. Pay attention.
Could you please provide your proof that I haven’t been paid anything by the government and so if you’re right, want to get the money that I’m entitled to. Please post your evidence here.
Bravo!
“Make my day” perfect ending. I used to pay people to prove me wrong on Facebook with that same line.
👏👏👍
These guys are getting paid by big pharma so dont know how much they earn to lie but big pharma may have its say by offering more.Also they would debate a super knowledgeable person when their info is built on total bs,so they could not win the debate.You might find no takers...dont be surprised....
A man after my own heart. I used to beibe people just to read data on certain topics. I would give them the cash and then say "all you have to do, to be able to keep that cash, is to read this information and then tell me that it's crazy. Even if you are lying, yoh can keep the money. You just have to be willing to say those words, whether you believe them or not". Most would not take me up on the offer - which exposed their desire to stay blue-pilled and naive. But of the ones that did take me up on the offer, none lied to keep the money. Now, they were friends and such, so that likely changed things. But Steve has always impressed me with his willingness to put his money where his mouth is. One of the only people i know of. I'd take a bullet for this guy.
Any doc whose been THAT brainwashed is incapable of debating.
Good luck with the generous offer and trying to draw any of these greedy sycophants out but the pharmaceutical companies have even deeper pockets and how many have a conscience?
You are the energizer bunny of spreading truth.
Thank you so much!!
Geeze Louise!! You already know there is corporate science or vaccinology as a pseudoscience versus those without blinders on who study and report on actual science.
Instead of using California-flair money and drama, why not consider inviting Nic Hulcher from the McCullough foundation for an interview to pick his brains?? You could include an opposite view to the sanitized version from last night; topics like: rouleau blood formations, white clots, teenage heart damage, kidney damage, brain damage, turbo cancers, placental transfer to infants, mothers dying from cancers within a year of giving birth, serious drop in birth rates in highly vaxxed nations. Nic has been reporting in detail on a wide variety of dastardly side effects for the past 2 plus years despite most being swept under the carpet, few acknowledge the insane amount of damage caused by these shots.
The corporate and govt types have incomes and careers at stake, same as what happened to Del’s “Inconvenient Study”. Damn near impossible task to crack that wall. Look for another way to walk around instead of repeatedly beating head into impenetrable wall.
I talked to Nic all the time
You are correct:
https://on.soundcloud.com/zTfFRB5v4FRCe6Z9eR
Perhaps you could structure the deal as $100k if they "win", vs $5k if they "lose" - in order to comp them for their time and risk.
that would incentivize EVERYONE to apply. No prep need. sit there for an hour and get 5K.
So maybe tune the dollar amount to match an hourly rate that comps them for time and travel. Set requirements for entry to be a proper h-index level. If Offit/Fauci/Hotez want to come and say nothing to all your challenges...maybe think of this as an opportunity to film them while you are asking the tough questions.
I'm just thinking of a way for you to remove any excuse not to show up, while not incentivizing EVERYONE to apply.
100 K with no risk is plenty of incentive.
Not true what you just said, Steve. "Everyone" could not apply because you significantly limited the number of people who could apply and qualify for the debate by stating that the person needed an h-index >=10. What I recommend is that you do something similar to what Mr. Pare suggested, which is to offer $5,000 for the FIRST PERSON who has an h-index >=10 who agrees to debate you. That way you are out only $5,000, and not more than that because that will be the only debate that will be held on the topic. At least you will finally have a debate with someone, and you can boast afterwards how badly you beat the guy, how poorly he knew the pertinent science, etc.
Because they will just accept the 5K and sit there and just say I’m wrong
Good news is, you'll have it all on film. Maybe: think of this as you making a movie, and you are paying a "bad guy actor" to play his role. The more pathetically they play the role, the worse it will look. And it really won't cost you much at all.
You could limit it to Fauci, Offit, and Hotez. $5k expenses (conditional on performance requirements), and $100k if they win.