Well, it's only been a few days, and Woodrow's tone is uncharitable. But his main point is right. A bombshell story with potential to affect every third person on the planet like this, and a clock-ticking life-or-death aspect to it, the public needs as much follow-up as possible. This is either the vilest of frauds, or the story of th…
Well, it's only been a few days, and Woodrow's tone is uncharitable. But his main point is right. A bombshell story with potential to affect every third person on the planet like this, and a clock-ticking life-or-death aspect to it, the public needs as much follow-up as possible. This is either the vilest of frauds, or the story of the century. SK and the Dr. who interviewed Mr. Hirschman must now spend at least half of their time on this, if not more. It goes w/o saying that other journalists and experts have an obligation to look into also. We need: 1) interviews with embalmers all over the nation, and in other nations, asking them if they've noticed this, 2.) investigation of Hirschman's background, 3.) interviews to get his fellow embalmers on record, 4.) untiring, day after day, demands for investigation by top medical authorities, 5.) lab analysis of the string-clots, 6.) Hirschman and other embalmers given shadows to record their work for the next several weeks, so that we have filmed, expert-observed, double-checks on what they say they've found. And much more.
The problem is, where would we find experts who would report accurately or medical authorities who would investigate earnestly? There are undoubtedly gatekeepers that have been preventing such info as this from getting out and getting credibility. When the sources most people regard as credible are committing mass fraud, what is there to do?
But I'm all for doing the best we can with the best truth-seekers we can find and enlist.
"I'm all for doing the best we can with the best truth-seekers we can find."
You have hit upon the heart of my own concern here. I come to this substack account seeking truth that I know I will not find elsewhere. When Mr. Kirschman said that this story was the "real deal," I thought we finally had solid, pervasive, undeniable proof that something has gone very, very wrong. Rather than follow it up, however, Mr. Kirschman appears to have dropped it entirely. Why? Frankly, I am reluctant to just let it go because I will be forced to let a few other things go as well and I do not want to do that too easily.
Well, it's only been a few days, and Woodrow's tone is uncharitable. But his main point is right. A bombshell story with potential to affect every third person on the planet like this, and a clock-ticking life-or-death aspect to it, the public needs as much follow-up as possible. This is either the vilest of frauds, or the story of the century. SK and the Dr. who interviewed Mr. Hirschman must now spend at least half of their time on this, if not more. It goes w/o saying that other journalists and experts have an obligation to look into also. We need: 1) interviews with embalmers all over the nation, and in other nations, asking them if they've noticed this, 2.) investigation of Hirschman's background, 3.) interviews to get his fellow embalmers on record, 4.) untiring, day after day, demands for investigation by top medical authorities, 5.) lab analysis of the string-clots, 6.) Hirschman and other embalmers given shadows to record their work for the next several weeks, so that we have filmed, expert-observed, double-checks on what they say they've found. And much more.
The problem is, where would we find experts who would report accurately or medical authorities who would investigate earnestly? There are undoubtedly gatekeepers that have been preventing such info as this from getting out and getting credibility. When the sources most people regard as credible are committing mass fraud, what is there to do?
But I'm all for doing the best we can with the best truth-seekers we can find and enlist.
"I'm all for doing the best we can with the best truth-seekers we can find."
You have hit upon the heart of my own concern here. I come to this substack account seeking truth that I know I will not find elsewhere. When Mr. Kirschman said that this story was the "real deal," I thought we finally had solid, pervasive, undeniable proof that something has gone very, very wrong. Rather than follow it up, however, Mr. Kirschman appears to have dropped it entirely. Why? Frankly, I am reluctant to just let it go because I will be forced to let a few other things go as well and I do not want to do that too easily.
Exactly, Woodrow. The greater the heresy, the greater the need for corroboration for it to catch on.
Exactly. Exactly. Exactly.