No reasonable person would drop a story like this in people's laps and walk away without further comment. Either this is fraudulent disinformation and you should tell us that you screwed up by spreading it or it is true and deserves a follow up story. Until you deliver one or the other, I have no choice but to regard anything from you as suspect.
No reasonable person would drop a story like this in people's laps and walk away without further comment. Either this is fraudulent disinformation and you should tell us that you screwed up by spreading it or it is true and deserves a follow up story. Until you deliver one or the other, I have no choice but to regard anything from you as suspect.
I understand and share some of your skepticism, but I think this needs some time. It is extremely concerning and we do not know whether, if true, it is vax, virus, or both that are causing it. And while intended to be a win for natural infection and recovery, A Berenson’s recent post regarding the persistence of spike antibodies in the recovered, give me pause. Why is the body still producing antibodies 20+months later? Are the antibodies toxic (see Chinese study supporting this possibility)? This needs urgent study.
I am NOT disputing the embalmer's story. I am simply saying that one embalmer's story is like a Canadian truck convoy of only one truck.
BTW, one of the jobs that put me through college involved living above a funeral home and helping embalmers with the grunt work of moving the bodies, especially at night. I watched dozens of embalmings while keeping the embalmer company, usually in the very wee hours of the morning.
From that admittedly limited perspective, everything about the embalmer's story checks out. So do the photographs. And, as the embalmer said, those odd, fibrous clots are incredibly outside the norm. If the embalmer's story about how those clots came to be on the embalming table is true, then there are two very important questions here: "Why are other embalmers no speaking out?" And "Why are people like Steve and Dr. Ruby not following up?"
I do not pretend to have the answer to either question. I do very firmly state, however, that, absent answers to those questions, we have no choice but to question everything and everyone involved.
My reaction exactly. Everything I could find in an Internet search referred back to that same video. Perhaps there are references to further information in the video, which I haven't watched. I prefer to read rather than watch videos.
Mine as well. I searched out "embalmers find clots". There is a story that comes from the Huff Post that was authored in September 2021. The Texas-based embalmer starring in that one made a case for the clots being the result of covid and not the gene-therapy. Only the two, Hirshman and Huey.
I, too, would like to get a wider view from more embalmers. The funeral directors have a huge lobby in D.C. apparently, though, so that may be difficult to get more to talk.
Here's the thing: couldn't it be both? If covid is responsible for "thrombosis"-like reactions and the gene-therapy was meant to be similar to a real vaccine couldn't the spike in the one do the same as the spike in the other?
It just seems to me that so many of the jab "cons" are the same as the virus symptoms.
Perhaps, all of it was engineered to be "all of one": if the one doesn't "get 'em" the other will, mentality.
A deliberately created bioweapon that attacks the weakest for the kill, and to compromise the healthy further down the line, followed up by a shot that puts the wrapping on the gift.
For the record, I cannot honestly say I have seen/heard of "excessive deaths" in my small sphere of influence. Although, I suspect a couple of vaxx injuries and one "sudden" death, but in the demographics they aren't outside the entire norm.
Not gonna lie, I expected more vaxx-related deaths. I am glad they are fewer than promised, same as the coof.
Well, it's only been a few days, and Woodrow's tone is uncharitable. But his main point is right. A bombshell story with potential to affect every third person on the planet like this, and a clock-ticking life-or-death aspect to it, the public needs as much follow-up as possible. This is either the vilest of frauds, or the story of the century. SK and the Dr. who interviewed Mr. Hirschman must now spend at least half of their time on this, if not more. It goes w/o saying that other journalists and experts have an obligation to look into also. We need: 1) interviews with embalmers all over the nation, and in other nations, asking them if they've noticed this, 2.) investigation of Hirschman's background, 3.) interviews to get his fellow embalmers on record, 4.) untiring, day after day, demands for investigation by top medical authorities, 5.) lab analysis of the string-clots, 6.) Hirschman and other embalmers given shadows to record their work for the next several weeks, so that we have filmed, expert-observed, double-checks on what they say they've found. And much more.
The problem is, where would we find experts who would report accurately or medical authorities who would investigate earnestly? There are undoubtedly gatekeepers that have been preventing such info as this from getting out and getting credibility. When the sources most people regard as credible are committing mass fraud, what is there to do?
But I'm all for doing the best we can with the best truth-seekers we can find and enlist.
"I'm all for doing the best we can with the best truth-seekers we can find."
You have hit upon the heart of my own concern here. I come to this substack account seeking truth that I know I will not find elsewhere. When Mr. Kirschman said that this story was the "real deal," I thought we finally had solid, pervasive, undeniable proof that something has gone very, very wrong. Rather than follow it up, however, Mr. Kirschman appears to have dropped it entirely. Why? Frankly, I am reluctant to just let it go because I will be forced to let a few other things go as well and I do not want to do that too easily.
As we all know, legacy media likely won't be the ones, and they will likely spoil any factual investigation they do with editorializing junk. But dissident-friendly investigators must go full-bore. They must appoint investigators who assume Hirschman is some kind of fraud-agent, and seek to uncover every stone. Others who assume he's making some kind of mistake about what he's seeing, who take the stuff to labs. Others who go to every other embalmer in the nation. And on and on and on...
Someone should be able to find some corroborating information. Everything I managed to find referred back to the same original video. My search is also included Lieutenant Colonel Long.
No reasonable person would drop a story like this in people's laps and walk away without further comment. Either this is fraudulent disinformation and you should tell us that you screwed up by spreading it or it is true and deserves a follow up story. Until you deliver one or the other, I have no choice but to regard anything from you as suspect.
I understand and share some of your skepticism, but I think this needs some time. It is extremely concerning and we do not know whether, if true, it is vax, virus, or both that are causing it. And while intended to be a win for natural infection and recovery, A Berenson’s recent post regarding the persistence of spike antibodies in the recovered, give me pause. Why is the body still producing antibodies 20+months later? Are the antibodies toxic (see Chinese study supporting this possibility)? This needs urgent study.
are you for real? are you an embalmer to argue his testimony?
Exactly!!! Plus there is so much evidence of so many tragedies from these death jabs!
See my response to Tim. Add to that: Steve has since followed up exactly as I said was necessary.
I am NOT disputing the embalmer's story. I am simply saying that one embalmer's story is like a Canadian truck convoy of only one truck.
BTW, one of the jobs that put me through college involved living above a funeral home and helping embalmers with the grunt work of moving the bodies, especially at night. I watched dozens of embalmings while keeping the embalmer company, usually in the very wee hours of the morning.
From that admittedly limited perspective, everything about the embalmer's story checks out. So do the photographs. And, as the embalmer said, those odd, fibrous clots are incredibly outside the norm. If the embalmer's story about how those clots came to be on the embalming table is true, then there are two very important questions here: "Why are other embalmers no speaking out?" And "Why are people like Steve and Dr. Ruby not following up?"
I do not pretend to have the answer to either question. I do very firmly state, however, that, absent answers to those questions, we have no choice but to question everything and everyone involved.
My reaction exactly. Everything I could find in an Internet search referred back to that same video. Perhaps there are references to further information in the video, which I haven't watched. I prefer to read rather than watch videos.
Mine as well. I searched out "embalmers find clots". There is a story that comes from the Huff Post that was authored in September 2021. The Texas-based embalmer starring in that one made a case for the clots being the result of covid and not the gene-therapy. Only the two, Hirshman and Huey.
I, too, would like to get a wider view from more embalmers. The funeral directors have a huge lobby in D.C. apparently, though, so that may be difficult to get more to talk.
Here's the thing: couldn't it be both? If covid is responsible for "thrombosis"-like reactions and the gene-therapy was meant to be similar to a real vaccine couldn't the spike in the one do the same as the spike in the other?
It just seems to me that so many of the jab "cons" are the same as the virus symptoms.
Perhaps, all of it was engineered to be "all of one": if the one doesn't "get 'em" the other will, mentality.
A deliberately created bioweapon that attacks the weakest for the kill, and to compromise the healthy further down the line, followed up by a shot that puts the wrapping on the gift.
For the record, I cannot honestly say I have seen/heard of "excessive deaths" in my small sphere of influence. Although, I suspect a couple of vaxx injuries and one "sudden" death, but in the demographics they aren't outside the entire norm.
Not gonna lie, I expected more vaxx-related deaths. I am glad they are fewer than promised, same as the coof.
Well, it's only been a few days, and Woodrow's tone is uncharitable. But his main point is right. A bombshell story with potential to affect every third person on the planet like this, and a clock-ticking life-or-death aspect to it, the public needs as much follow-up as possible. This is either the vilest of frauds, or the story of the century. SK and the Dr. who interviewed Mr. Hirschman must now spend at least half of their time on this, if not more. It goes w/o saying that other journalists and experts have an obligation to look into also. We need: 1) interviews with embalmers all over the nation, and in other nations, asking them if they've noticed this, 2.) investigation of Hirschman's background, 3.) interviews to get his fellow embalmers on record, 4.) untiring, day after day, demands for investigation by top medical authorities, 5.) lab analysis of the string-clots, 6.) Hirschman and other embalmers given shadows to record their work for the next several weeks, so that we have filmed, expert-observed, double-checks on what they say they've found. And much more.
The problem is, where would we find experts who would report accurately or medical authorities who would investigate earnestly? There are undoubtedly gatekeepers that have been preventing such info as this from getting out and getting credibility. When the sources most people regard as credible are committing mass fraud, what is there to do?
But I'm all for doing the best we can with the best truth-seekers we can find and enlist.
"I'm all for doing the best we can with the best truth-seekers we can find."
You have hit upon the heart of my own concern here. I come to this substack account seeking truth that I know I will not find elsewhere. When Mr. Kirschman said that this story was the "real deal," I thought we finally had solid, pervasive, undeniable proof that something has gone very, very wrong. Rather than follow it up, however, Mr. Kirschman appears to have dropped it entirely. Why? Frankly, I am reluctant to just let it go because I will be forced to let a few other things go as well and I do not want to do that too easily.
Exactly, Woodrow. The greater the heresy, the greater the need for corroboration for it to catch on.
Exactly. Exactly. Exactly.
What sort of follow up story would you find satisfactory?
Perhaps some of the “heritage” media could do an investigative report.
See Carl Eric Scott's response to my post.
As we all know, legacy media likely won't be the ones, and they will likely spoil any factual investigation they do with editorializing junk. But dissident-friendly investigators must go full-bore. They must appoint investigators who assume Hirschman is some kind of fraud-agent, and seek to uncover every stone. Others who assume he's making some kind of mistake about what he's seeing, who take the stuff to labs. Others who go to every other embalmer in the nation. And on and on and on...
Someone should be able to find some corroborating information. Everything I managed to find referred back to the same original video. My search is also included Lieutenant Colonel Long.