Baker is not even a good epidemiologist. He read a script that any untrained person could have read. He failed to grasp the essentials, like the jab did not prevent infection, or transmission, unlike the Finnish expert who now testifies they had zero effect in preventing both.
Baker is not even a good epidemiologist. He read a script that any untrained person could have read. He failed to grasp the essentials, like the jab did not prevent infection, or transmission, unlike the Finnish expert who now testifies they had zero effect in preventing both.
Baker is not even a good epidemiologist. He read a script that any untrained person could have read. He failed to grasp the essentials, like the jab did not prevent infection, or transmission, unlike the Finnish expert who now testifies they had zero effect in preventing both.