Why won't LinkedIn tell me the proof they have that what I posted was inaccurate or misleading?
I give LinkedIn full permission to discuss my case publicly. I would like to know what evidence they have that I'm wrong and why they won't tell me what that evidence is?
I’d like a representative from LinkedIn to clarify in a live discussion what information I posted that is misleading or inaccurate and how they know that to be true.
Clearly, LinkedIn thinks it is extremely serious what I’m saying that they must ban me for life.
But the problem is that they don’t provide any evidence that I’m wrong so I keep spreading the same inaccurate or misleading information.
It must have taken them a lot of work to find the evidence. Why not reveal it?
They are deliberately keeping me, and everyone else, in the dark as to their evidence.
I’m transparent about the evidence I have for my statements. The evidence I have is all laid out on my Substack in hundreds of articles all publicly available.
Why does LinkedIn’s evidence have to remain secret?
This isn’t about me
I’m offering my case as a teaching moment for all LinkedIn members to get insight into the methods LinkedIn can use to terminate your account as well if you express opinions they don’t agree with.
I just talked to Robert Malone and he is equally confused. When LinkedIn banned him for life, they gave no reason. He’s still confused about what he did wrong and would love to hear the evidence.
Summary
Where is the evidence that I’m wrong and why won’t you disclose it?
Can we have a public recorded discussion about this? I’m willing to pay any reasonable costs for this and give you full permission to discuss my account.
If any of my readers works at LinkedIn, can you please find out how the public is best served by LinkedIn concealing the evidence that was used to justify terminating my account and Robert Malone’s account? This is just baffling to me.
They tried to ban me and I threatened them by showing them a letter I wrote to the senator in my state and our attorney general asking for an investigation as well as requesting that my state not use taxpayer funds to purchase LinkedIn services which they are doing. I had my account back within a day.
I didn’t just threaten a letter I wrote the letter and sent it to them.
Also in my research I found out the national head of sales for LinkedIn is someone by the name of the Daniel Shepero. He was going to be my next stop where I was going to make it my life‘s mission to have state and local governments shut off any paid services that they are using with LinkedIn.
I’m not effing with these people. If they ban me again I go to Shepero. If they don’t lift it or ban me again I start posting names of their employees on social media. They are no different than those who never killed or hurt a Jew but did other services for the Nazi machine to build up and run. Find a job elsewhere.
I am beginning to hope that most of us (Steve, you would be an example) are waking up to the fact that these last-generation platforms are not salvageable...sort of like the Pennsylvania Railroad. They just do not know it yet.
The stirrings of Musk starting a Twitter competitor (he will shut them down...much more able than the Truth guys who STILL cannot get me registered (#536,209) more than a month later) and Boreing starting Jeremey's Razors I hope are an indicator of a whole new generation of non-Woke, honest businesses that stand for open discussion, open competition, and that abhor cancellation and censorship.
Fingers crossed for the newer, better world. I have given up on the old one...and good riddance.
And blessings to SubStack for, in many ways, leading the way.