My first comment on a Kirsch blog. The DC rally on 1/23 is admirable in its scope, perhaps it will form a historic sea change, but experience indicates that protests et al are of minimal benefit because they are simply ignored (especially now) and pose no dire threat to guilty parties they target. The PR option in this war is of limited …
My first comment on a Kirsch blog. The DC rally on 1/23 is admirable in its scope, perhaps it will form a historic sea change, but experience indicates that protests et al are of minimal benefit because they are simply ignored (especially now) and pose no dire threat to guilty parties they target. The PR option in this war is of limited effectiveness. Mr Kirsch said he invested $500 grand on this event. The depressing thought of this being a grand misappropriation of limited funds (against an enemy with limitless financial resources) was going through my mind while reading these comments. But then I read the very long, detailed Nov 12th comment from “hillcountry”cut and pasted from Grant Genereux’s retinols acid postulation. This comment received no likes compared to the empassioned but impotent comments made by those stricken by our enemy, which made me uncontrollably face-palm because we are obviously past the stage where publicizing the murdered and injured will do anything to defeat our enemy. If it was going to help, it would have by now. The mass-formed turn their backs, media won’t cover it (which is the primary aim in a protest).
Mr Kirsch said it himself (paraphrased): “It’s good that we don’t rely on the Supreme Court for fact-based cases (aka discovery of evidence)….” The only hope we have of erasing this dystopia before it gets far worse is the court room where evidence and witnesses are brought to bare on crime. I’m sure you know where I’m going with this by now, if you’re reading this, Mr Kirsch. I’m more interested in news on (verified) undisclosed ingredients in pharma’s products that goes to a court room than I am hearing about how $500g went to another hopefully not-impotent protest. Malone on Rogan’s show is good, but not as good as him on a witness stand. The debate which Mr Kirsch offers millions to our enemy to have, and their refusal, should be seen as a good test of how successful a case would be in a court room where the enemy is forced to take part. Spend your money on this avenue, Mr Kirsch. Fundraise for Genereux’s analysis of retinoic acid in the jabs. Alfonse Capone was not brought down for murder, even after St Valentine’s Day. He was ended with tax evasion in a court room. Maybe this will fail as well, but my research into how court cases have been going our way is emboldening. Of course, if you are moving in that direction, I know you can’t announce that to the enemy all over your blog. But just in case you aren’t, I thought It worth mentioning.
My first comment on a Kirsch blog. The DC rally on 1/23 is admirable in its scope, perhaps it will form a historic sea change, but experience indicates that protests et al are of minimal benefit because they are simply ignored (especially now) and pose no dire threat to guilty parties they target. The PR option in this war is of limited effectiveness. Mr Kirsch said he invested $500 grand on this event. The depressing thought of this being a grand misappropriation of limited funds (against an enemy with limitless financial resources) was going through my mind while reading these comments. But then I read the very long, detailed Nov 12th comment from “hillcountry”cut and pasted from Grant Genereux’s retinols acid postulation. This comment received no likes compared to the empassioned but impotent comments made by those stricken by our enemy, which made me uncontrollably face-palm because we are obviously past the stage where publicizing the murdered and injured will do anything to defeat our enemy. If it was going to help, it would have by now. The mass-formed turn their backs, media won’t cover it (which is the primary aim in a protest).
Mr Kirsch said it himself (paraphrased): “It’s good that we don’t rely on the Supreme Court for fact-based cases (aka discovery of evidence)….” The only hope we have of erasing this dystopia before it gets far worse is the court room where evidence and witnesses are brought to bare on crime. I’m sure you know where I’m going with this by now, if you’re reading this, Mr Kirsch. I’m more interested in news on (verified) undisclosed ingredients in pharma’s products that goes to a court room than I am hearing about how $500g went to another hopefully not-impotent protest. Malone on Rogan’s show is good, but not as good as him on a witness stand. The debate which Mr Kirsch offers millions to our enemy to have, and their refusal, should be seen as a good test of how successful a case would be in a court room where the enemy is forced to take part. Spend your money on this avenue, Mr Kirsch. Fundraise for Genereux’s analysis of retinoic acid in the jabs. Alfonse Capone was not brought down for murder, even after St Valentine’s Day. He was ended with tax evasion in a court room. Maybe this will fail as well, but my research into how court cases have been going our way is emboldening. Of course, if you are moving in that direction, I know you can’t announce that to the enemy all over your blog. But just in case you aren’t, I thought It worth mentioning.