Steve, thank you. Also, a colleague has mentioned that having data not just from VAERS but from the total population, is needed. Not being an expert, I ask: What are the number of deaths from heart attacks in that age group, where VAERS data may show 0 deaths over the previous 5 years? The point being, perhaps the VAERS data "under sampl…
Steve, thank you. Also, a colleague has mentioned that having data not just from VAERS but from the total population, is needed. Not being an expert, I ask: What are the number of deaths from heart attacks in that age group, where VAERS data may show 0 deaths over the previous 5 years? The point being, perhaps the VAERS data "under samples" all kids in that age group in the USA, and that the fraction of (very unfortunate) deaths is, alas, statistically normal if one considers the entire population (another data source, then VAERS)? Is it possible to address this--is there such a data source? For example, his specific comment is
"Using one of the cited causes of death, cerebral hemorrhage, a report (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1847395/) quotes an incidence rate around 0.5/100000 children with a 25% fatality rate, so around 0.1/100000 deaths. With 8.9 million vaccinated children, once would expect about 8 fatalities. With 2 reported fatalities due to cerebral hemorrhage, I would conclude that the Vaccine lowers its risk. You're welcome.
Now, seriously: my interpretation is that these fatalities, as tragic as they may be, are not higher than the average rate in the overall population, causing the CDC not to investigate them further." I responded by pointing out that these deaths of children that you discuss likely shortly followed receiving the shot. But he came back and said, essentially, that it doesn't seem like the VAERS data or other data cited, refers to the time duration between shot, and death. So--some further things that you and your team might be able to consider and thus possibly respond to? As to me personally--I've read the recently published book by Breggin and Breggin, seen you and others on podcasts, and thus am aware of the "plandemic" aspects and other (nefarious) goals afoot. But I bring up the above issues as they have been raised by someone else as, seemingly, relevant to the analysis.
VAERS stands for Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, so of course you won't find any data regarding these deaths or any that is not directly linked to a vaccine. VAERS does not report on everyone's deaths, and that data has to be looked up government by government (some disclose it, some don't...)
Steve, thank you. Also, a colleague has mentioned that having data not just from VAERS but from the total population, is needed. Not being an expert, I ask: What are the number of deaths from heart attacks in that age group, where VAERS data may show 0 deaths over the previous 5 years? The point being, perhaps the VAERS data "under samples" all kids in that age group in the USA, and that the fraction of (very unfortunate) deaths is, alas, statistically normal if one considers the entire population (another data source, then VAERS)? Is it possible to address this--is there such a data source? For example, his specific comment is
"Using one of the cited causes of death, cerebral hemorrhage, a report (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1847395/) quotes an incidence rate around 0.5/100000 children with a 25% fatality rate, so around 0.1/100000 deaths. With 8.9 million vaccinated children, once would expect about 8 fatalities. With 2 reported fatalities due to cerebral hemorrhage, I would conclude that the Vaccine lowers its risk. You're welcome.
Now, seriously: my interpretation is that these fatalities, as tragic as they may be, are not higher than the average rate in the overall population, causing the CDC not to investigate them further." I responded by pointing out that these deaths of children that you discuss likely shortly followed receiving the shot. But he came back and said, essentially, that it doesn't seem like the VAERS data or other data cited, refers to the time duration between shot, and death. So--some further things that you and your team might be able to consider and thus possibly respond to? As to me personally--I've read the recently published book by Breggin and Breggin, seen you and others on podcasts, and thus am aware of the "plandemic" aspects and other (nefarious) goals afoot. But I bring up the above issues as they have been raised by someone else as, seemingly, relevant to the analysis.
VAERS stands for Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, so of course you won't find any data regarding these deaths or any that is not directly linked to a vaccine. VAERS does not report on everyone's deaths, and that data has to be looked up government by government (some disclose it, some don't...)