Whoops! FOIA response from Santa Clara County reveals that the COVID shots INCREASED your risk of getting COVID!
The COVID vaccines worked in reverse making people more susceptible. Attempts to contact Santa Clara County Public Health Department for comment were totally ignored.
Executive summary
Based on new data I just got from a FOIA request, it appears that the public health epidemiologists in Santa Clara County knew in January 2022 that the vaccines made people more likely to get COVID, but they remained silent.
98% of the people with COVID were vaccinated, but the vaccination rate in the County at the time the data was collected was 86%. In short, the vaccine made it more likely you got COVID.
I predict that there will be further silence on this matter: no accountability and no opportunity for public challenges. They will continue to push the shots as if nothing had happened and the mainstream media will ignore this important data.
Here is the data for you to download yourself
Download it here. When you click the link, it will silently download the Excel file to your Downloads folder.
Summary of the data
The data in the spreadsheet is from January 2022 and contains a line for each person who was diagnosed with COVID in that month.
N means unvaccinated. Y means vaccinated. U means unknown. Blank means unknown.
Santa Clara County is highly vaccinated (95%), but it isn’t that highly vaccinated!
In fact, one of my critics (who I challenged to discuss his criticism with me), pointed out that at the time, the vax rate was a measly 86%! He wrote, “On January 31, 2022, the county reported 260,861 unvaccinated residents and 1,595,689 vaccinated residents.”
blocked me on both X and Medium after I openly challenged his article and his analysis. These people who attack my work are like cockroaches… when you turn on the light, they run for cover instead of defending their work.The rows are 10 year age groups.
So the percentage of people who were diagnosed with COVID (98% or more) was higher than the percentage of people who got the vaccine (86%).
THAT’S THE PROBLEM IN A NUTSHELL.
In other words, the vaccine made you more likely to get COVID instead of 10X less likely that they claimed in the clinical trials.
Why didn’t they warn people??? They knew about this in January 2022, more than 2 years ago and said nothing. Why?
Implications of 86% vaccination rate, but a 98% rate of vaccinated being COVID positive
Given:
86% of the population is vaccinated.
14% is unvaccinated.
98% of COVID cases are in vaccinated people.
2% are in unvaccinated people.
To compute the relative risk of infection for vaccinated vs. unvaccinated individuals, we normalize by the size of each group.
Step-by-step:
Let’s assume a population size of 100,000 to make it easier.
Vaccinated: 86,000 people
Unvaccinated: 14,000 people
Suppose there are 1,000 COVID cases:
980 are vaccinated (98%)
20 are unvaccinated (2%)
Infection rates:
Vaccinated infection rate = 980 / 86,000 = 0.0114 (1.14%)
Unvaccinated infection rate = 20 / 14,000 = 0.00143 (0.143%)
Relative risk (RR):
RR = (vaccinated infection rate) / (unvaccinated infection rate)
= 0.0114 / 0.00143 ≈ 7.97
Controlled study at renowned Cleveland Clinic showed the same thing: more vaccines, higher likelihood to get COVID. It’s in the peer-reviewed literature.
Here’s the latest paper which confirms the earlier paper. It’s been thoroughly investigated and confirmed with 2 papers now in the peer-reviewed literature!
More shots —> more COVID infections.
Note that the error bars don’t overlap meaning the difference is statistically significant.
The exact same thing is happening in Australia!
Stunning parallels in Australia:
Summary
The COVID vaccine trials were fraudulent. There is no possible way they got 90% efficacy (a 10X reduction in infection risk). They did it through deception as described here. The vaccines actually made you more likely to get COVID as we learned from the Santa Clara data, the Cleveland Clinic study, and numerous other sources (see this article for example).
The numbers here are highly statistically significant. It appears that the Santa Clara County Health epidemiologists knew something was wrong by January 2022, but instead of warning people, they kept their mouths shut about it. There was no public admission of this, no public warning. I predict that there will NEVER be any public accountability of what happened because public officials never like to admit they were responsible for killing people with these useless and deadly vaccines.
The Santa Clara County Health Department ignored all my attempts (multiple phone calls and emails) to solicit a response to this article.
I assume the unvaxxed include those who were jabbed once or twice but were not at 21 days yet? I bet the ratio is way worse than this data shows
Same pattern of behavior amongst Australian bureaucrats:
NSW government pushed the vaxx with propaganda and coercion. Then NSW hospital data showed a consolidating, clear pattern indicating that the vaxx increases the risk of infection, with a clear dose-dependent relationship.
How did the NSW bureaucrats respond, do you think? They buried the data. They did not discuss or act on the clear increased risk from their coercive policies. They continued to recommend the unsafe, ineffective, experimental injections to everyone including children and pregnant women. They continued to coerce their own healthcare staff to submit to ongoing experimental injections.
This professional bureaucratic behaviour is obviously self-serving and dangerous to the public. These government employees should obviously be terminated and punished.