I'm being informed (in a roundabout way) that if Sen. Ron Johnson would lead with this type of stark, direct information that he would be committing career suicide and would not get elected.
And that by massaging the data, he may get elected and will be able to effect change.
1. Is this correct, Kirsch Board?
2. If it is...what are the odd…
I'm being informed (in a roundabout way) that if Sen. Ron Johnson would lead with this type of stark, direct information that he would be committing career suicide and would not get elected.
And that by massaging the data, he may get elected and will be able to effect change.
1. Is this correct, Kirsch Board?
2. If it is...what are the odds that the same logic will neuter any response moving forwards? That there will always be a sword of "Don't go there" that looms overhead?
I'm being informed (in a roundabout way) that if Sen. Ron Johnson would lead with this type of stark, direct information that he would be committing career suicide and would not get elected.
And that by massaging the data, he may get elected and will be able to effect change.
1. Is this correct, Kirsch Board?
2. If it is...what are the odds that the same logic will neuter any response moving forwards? That there will always be a sword of "Don't go there" that looms overhead?
that's a good question. i'm not i'd be able to discuss that though