Discussion about this post

User's avatar
StrikerMalone's avatar

I am just wondering if there is any point at this stage presenting evidence and arguing the science. Even making it to court seems to make no difference. Here in New Zealand, judges have already made up their minds about what is "established science".

The word "vaccine" casts a magic spell over people. Junk science is being published in journals like the Lancet.

I think we are at a point now where only mass civil disobedience and peaceful protests in huge numbers will make a difference. The larger these protests get, and the more the mainstream media ignore it, the more their daily life become immersed in a supreme lie. It HAS to extract a psychological toll on them.

In Australia, after about two weeks of mass protests, the cowardly Prime Minister Scott Morrison came out and made some feeble statements about vaccine mandates being wrong. But at least he was being somehow forced to act.

But I fear presenting facts, whether to our own echo chambers, or to the FDA hearings like Steve did, makes no difference. They just plough right over it. A terrible time for humanity.

Expand full comment
Dr. Colleen Huber's avatar

I have offered to debate masks, lockdowns and/or vaccines, and no one will do it. A mutual patient told me that a MD in Tucson is so enthusiastic about the COVID vaccines that he will debate anyone. When I called him to debate, he declined, because the vaccines are so wonderful, there would be nothing to say.

Expand full comment
162 more comments...

No posts