65 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

I believe ALL the following arguments should be raised when arguing against vackseen mandates:

Vax mandates ILLEGAL:

a/ Basic right of sovereignty over our own body

b/ Violate laws on medical privacy & discrimination

c/ Illegal to mandate an experimental medicine/biologic (note only EUA rona vacks available & pushed)

d/ No justification, rona flu 99+% survival

e/ Vax cause injury/death

f/ All above imply sinister motives of tyranny/dep0pulat!on

Two references related to item c/ above. And, of course, Malone is making this argument as well.

In one case, the judge was sympathetic to the argument of the EUA vackseen being used instead of the FDA approved one: "Ultimately, the judge appeared sympathetic to the plaintiffs, but threw the lawsuit out because it was filed anonymously due to fear for reprisal."

https://nationalfile.com/exclusive-pfizer-wont-confirm-fda-approved-comirnaty-vaccine-available-americans/

https://theohiostar.com/2021/12/15/exclusive-ohios-largest-hospital-system-still-distributing-pfizer-covid-19-vaccine-not-fully-approved-by-fda/

Expand full comment