I was intrigued as well, so I did some research. The jab is currently classified as CICP. The problem is that it looks like it can be categorized as such only during a pandemic/epidemic, not an endemic. So they're attempting to move it to the VICP category before we shift to the endemic status, which is where the "childhood" part comes i…
I was intrigued as well, so I did some research. The jab is currently classified as CICP. The problem is that it looks like it can be categorized as such only during a pandemic/epidemic, not an endemic. So they're attempting to move it to the VICP category before we shift to the endemic status, which is where the "childhood" part comes in. So my conclusion is that RFK jr is indeed correct.
Let me know if people find anything odd about my reasoning.
I was intrigued as well, so I did some research. The jab is currently classified as CICP. The problem is that it looks like it can be categorized as such only during a pandemic/epidemic, not an endemic. So they're attempting to move it to the VICP category before we shift to the endemic status, which is where the "childhood" part comes in. So my conclusion is that RFK jr is indeed correct.
Let me know if people find anything odd about my reasoning.
1. CICP vs VICP
https://hrsa.gov/cicp/cicp-vicp
2. "Cactus" = CICP
https://hrsa.gov/cicp/
3. CICP = just for pandemic or epidemic (not endemic) prdts
https://hrsa.gov/cicp/faq
4. Must-jab-kids-part = VICP
https://hrsa.gov/vaccine-compensation/covered-vaccines/index.html
(FYI VICP is under NCVIA
https://cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/ensuringsafety/history/index.html )