It's good to be flexible, but accurate. For a blue pilled audience I prefer "pseudovaccines," "so-called 'vaccines'," "COVID-19 injections," "novel mRNA-LNP injections developed and trialled at warp speed at Trump's behest, unlike other vaccines or drugs that have been historically trialled for much longer, after 30 years of failure to gain regulatory approval'" etc
It's good to be flexible, but accurate. For a blue pilled audience I prefer "pseudovaccines," "so-called 'vaccines'," "COVID-19 injections," "novel mRNA-LNP injections developed and trialled at warp speed at Trump's behest, unlike other vaccines or drugs that have been historically trialled for much longer, after 30 years of failure to gain regulatory approval'" etc
I think I understand where you are coming from. There's overwhelming evidence of clots from the shots. Therefore "clot shot" is accurate. It was definitely a "death jab" for Carol Pearce in Canada after she died in 7 minutes after she was injected with the new bivalent booster that was tested on 8 mice. Others are dead too. So "death jab" and "slab jab" are accurate toio. Further, Rochelle Walensky has urged people who have not had a jab for 2 months to get a booster ASAP. An injection that needs to be repeated every 2 months for the duration of a person's life is not a vaccine in my opinion. You are right to not want to placate or coddle the pushers. I think whoever wrire that quote attributed to Steve was talking about persuading rather than placating. There is no point arguing with pushers. Arguing with a fool only proves there are two.
My beef is that the medical industry shoulders a great deal of responsibility for the clusterfuck we find ourselves in. I don't feel like speaking their language...
It's good to be flexible, but accurate. For a blue pilled audience I prefer "pseudovaccines," "so-called 'vaccines'," "COVID-19 injections," "novel mRNA-LNP injections developed and trialled at warp speed at Trump's behest, unlike other vaccines or drugs that have been historically trialled for much longer, after 30 years of failure to gain regulatory approval'" etc
The medical literature best refer to these jabs as the clot shots that they are... They are NOT vaccines!
I'm not interested in placating ANYONE. Coddling is not what this crisis demands...
I think I understand where you are coming from. There's overwhelming evidence of clots from the shots. Therefore "clot shot" is accurate. It was definitely a "death jab" for Carol Pearce in Canada after she died in 7 minutes after she was injected with the new bivalent booster that was tested on 8 mice. Others are dead too. So "death jab" and "slab jab" are accurate toio. Further, Rochelle Walensky has urged people who have not had a jab for 2 months to get a booster ASAP. An injection that needs to be repeated every 2 months for the duration of a person's life is not a vaccine in my opinion. You are right to not want to placate or coddle the pushers. I think whoever wrire that quote attributed to Steve was talking about persuading rather than placating. There is no point arguing with pushers. Arguing with a fool only proves there are two.
Thank you for your thoughtful reply.
My beef is that the medical industry shoulders a great deal of responsibility for the clusterfuck we find ourselves in. I don't feel like speaking their language...
They do shoulder that responsibility. Many are conformists who seem to just do what Pharma tells them. It's good that you don't bow down before them.