VSRF Call Thursday: Sasha Latypova!
VSRF Call Thursday: Sasha Latypova!
Former Big Pharma Executive Sasha Latypova will talk about the role of the US DoD in the creation of the virus and the vaccine.
VSRF Weekly Update
Thursday, May 11
7pm Eastern | 4pm Pacific
Register here to watch on Zoom
Or
Live stream on Rumble
On this week’s VSRF Update, I am excited to be speaking with Sasha Latypova, a former pharmaceutical industry research and development executive. With her extensive experience in clinical trials, regulatory approvals, and interactions with the FDA, Latypova offers a unique expert opinion based on observed evidence.
Latypova presents a compelling argument that the Covid-19 vaccine itself originated as a response to the virus. However, her analysis delves beyond the Chinese People's Liberation Army, investigating the alleged involvement of the U.S. Department of Defense in the creation of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the development of Covid mRNA injections.
The origins of Covid-19 have been a subject of intense debate and speculation since the beginning of the pandemic. Until now, the dominant narrative has presented two main explanations: either a lab leak from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, attributed to the Chinese Communist Party, or the official account that the virus emerged naturally from the Wuhan wet markets. However, this binary perspective oversimplifies the complex nature of the situation. It is crucial to critically examine these narratives and explore alternative possibilities, acknowledging the inherent controversy surrounding the origins of Covid-19.
One element of this controversy lies in the censorship of the lab leak hypothesis. While the first explanation was largely dismissed and labeled as a conspiracy theory, this doesn't automatically validate the alternative narrative. It is worth noting that Dr. Anthony Fauci's involvement in funding the Wuhan Institute with taxpayer dollars and subsequent misrepresentations have added fuel to the skepticism. These revelations prompt us to question whether other entities within the U.S. government, such as the Pentagon, could have been engaged in bio-weapon research. While this notion may sound conspiratorial, it is important not to dismiss it outright. It is vital to demand transparency regarding the types of bioweapons being developed, their location, associated costs, and ensuring accountability from those involved.
The insights shared by Sasha Latypova shed light on the potential involvement of multiple entities and prompt us to demand transparency and accountability in understanding the development and deployment of bioweapons, SARS-CoV-2 virus and the development of Covid mRNA injections.
Important: VSRF needs your support if we are to continue our work
VSRF is critically low on funds, and I cannot support VSRF single-handedly.
If you are able to donate, please consider making a generous donation now. You’ll be entitled to special benefits that we’ll be announcing soon for the various donation levels ($100 and higher).
Here’s a presentation and video summary of some of our accomplishments.
Please donate today.
Please also share widely! Just re-tweet any of these posts:
It is only fair that you conduct an interview with Karen Kingston too since Mrs. Kingston is one of the first, if not the first one to call the covid "vaccines" bioweapons with the evidence to back this assertion. Thank you.
This is a post from https://substack.com/profile/85350322-doesnt-matter
Doesnt Matter
13 hr ago
·edited 12 hr ago
Quick Note to Mr Kirsch:
first the references:
super successful and very top in his field in # of publications Dr Bhakdi talks about it being depopulation at 2min 10sec of this https://rumble.com/v2n79d6-159902250.html
and Dr Mike Yeadon , ex VP of global research of Pfizer, responsible for respiratory deceases! talks about it here: https://twitter.com/LeadingReport/status/1654179518842650624?cxt=HHwWgIC-9cLg6fQtAAAA
Mr Kirsch,
you appeared to be momentarily lost in fear ("OMG, could this be true?") after hearing from a very successful in her field
https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/full-video-of-the-discussion-with
Mrs Latypova that there's a depopulation agenda and you made a reasonable question: why would they choose a 0.1% death rate method (your current calculation of the effects of the injections, which you limit in scope, and equate to publicly admitted in VAERS death data or perhaps even other national data like UK, Israel etc data), and not a more deadly virus method that kills say 20 or 30% etc?
But in fact you don't need any immediate death rate from the injection, in order to dramatically depopulate, for example, it suffices to sterilize pretty much everyone and make it a privilege in the future to procreate (perhaps even sell that privilege if you're one of the planners behind this plandemic). And you've already seen that there's huge concentration of spike protein in the reproductive organs of boys and girls + you've already seen hopefully the devastating rates of involuntary rejection of fetuses and stillbirths etc.
https://rumble.com/v2o6ikg-vaccine-mandates-took-a-toll-on-pregnant-women-and-their-babies-heres-what-.html
Thus, if you were one of the planners of the plandemic etc and wanted to depopulate in stealth mode (so as to guarantee also that nobody surviving will still blame you, or at least that nobody would figure it out fast enough, before you gained full control of the surviving population with eg. CBDCs etc), then you'd pick precisely 0% death rate + sterilization which takes years to figure out you have been sterilized + very hard to attribute back to the covid injection.
It is obvious that the people behind the plandemic have different priorities and parameters they're optimizing for, than normal "nothings" like us, but perhaps it's not difficult to believe that one thing they DO make sure is top priority is their own safety and there's 8 billion candidates but it only takes one sufficiently skilled person to take them out. This fact alone makes it very likely they want to minimize the truly immediate drop dead count.from the injections, prioritizing stealth mode instead with sterilization of kids and stillbirths etc. They have untold money and they've been discussing Malthusian ideas of depopulation for centuries and taking it slow, they even seem to have been planning the injection plandemic ever since 1965 - 1990, depending on what you consider the true start of COVID virus bio-weapon development. Surely those people have the patience to wait for 10 or 20 or even 30 more years for people to die off slowly, without taking chances with any attribution back to them surfacing. Unfortunately either they couldn't follow, in such rushed way, good manufacturing practices perfectly, or perhaps they decided they also wanted to test on a small population of say 1%-5% some new tech like RFID + nano-tech control of remaining humans via 5G powered technology / wireless charging too, thus the visibly quick observed byproduct of deaths that you now calculate routinely with whatever manipulated or genuine data gets released around the globe.. But strictly speaking, they didn't even need 1% death rate to depopulate, as long as the stealth or at least plausibly deniable malfunction that affects the reproduction is all they achieved.
and here's the most recent presentation in the EU parliament by Dr David Martin that describes the history of when did this bioweapon really start developing? Ans. 1965 - 1990
https://rumble.com/v2m0enk-dr-david-martin-european-parliament-international-covid-summit-iii-5-3-23.html