A sequel book debunking studies that "prove vaccines are safe and effective" would be a huge step forward. The book would need to include studies that are claimed to "disprove that MMR-II causes autism" and studies that "fail to find evidence that vaccines cause autism." Two kinds of critique are needed: (1) critique of study design and …
A sequel book debunking studies that "prove vaccines are safe and effective" would be a huge step forward. The book would need to include studies that are claimed to "disprove that MMR-II causes autism" and studies that "fail to find evidence that vaccines cause autism." Two kinds of critique are needed: (1) critique of study design and (2) critique of statistical methods.
Neil Miller's book "Miller's Review of Critical Vaccine Studies" is excellent and a great companion book for Kennedy and Hooker's new book.
A sequel book debunking studies that "prove vaccines are safe and effective" would be a huge step forward. The book would need to include studies that are claimed to "disprove that MMR-II causes autism" and studies that "fail to find evidence that vaccines cause autism." Two kinds of critique are needed: (1) critique of study design and (2) critique of statistical methods.
Neil Miller's book "Miller's Review of Critical Vaccine Studies" is excellent and a great companion book for Kennedy and Hooker's new book.